Ide E, Maluf-Filho F, Chaves DM, Matuguma SE, Sakai P. Narrow-band imaging without magnification for detecting early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(39): 4408-4413 [PMID: 22110267 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i39.4408]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Edson Ide, MD, University of São Paulo, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit. São Paulo 05403-900, Brazil. contato@edsonide.med.br
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2011; 17(39): 4408-4413 Published online Oct 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i39.4408
Table 1 Histopathologic diagnosis by hematoxylin and eosin staining
Method
No. of endoscopic findings
SCC
Esophagitis
In situ
Intramucosal
Conventional
6
3
3
0
NBI
25
5
4
16
Lugol
42
5
4
33
Table 2 Cases of squamous cell carcinoma (macroscopic and histopathologic findings)
Case
Macroscopic classification by conventional endoscopy
Size(mm)
Location at esophagus
Histopathologic examination
161
n/i
10
Thoracic
Intramucosal
175
0-IIc
50
Thoracic
In situ
72
0-IIc
30
Thoracic
Intramucosal
15
0-IIb
20
Thoracic
In situ
94
0-IIc
50
Thoracic
Intramucosal
64
0-IIb
20
Thoracic
In situ
115
n/i
20
Thoracic
In situ
119
n/i
10
Thoracic
In situ
74
0-IIb
25
Thoracic
Intramucosal
Table 3 Comparison of performance across methods (95% confidence interval) (%)
Conventional endoscopic examination
NBI
Lugol’s solution
Sensitivity
66.7 (35.9-97.5)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
Specificity
100 (100-100)
86.7 (80.6-92.7)
72.5 (64.5-80.5)
PPV
100 (100-100)
36 (17.2-54.8)
21.4 (9.0-33.8)
NPV
97.6 (98.4-100)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
Accuracy
97.7 (95.1-100)
87.6 (81.9-93.3)
74.4 (66.9-81.9)
PLR
n/c
7.5
3.6
NLR
0.33
0
0
Table 4 Comparison of diagnostic performance of the three procedures for lesions < 10 mm and > 10 mm (%)
Conventional examination
NBI
Lugol’s solution
<10 mm
>10 mm
<10 mm
>10 mm
<10 mm
>10 mm
Sensitivity (95% CI)
0 (0-0)
85.7 (59.8-100)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
Specificity (95% CI)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
90 (84.6-95.4)
96.7 (93.5-100)
75.8 (68.2-83.5)
96.7 (93.5-100)
PPV (95% CI)
n/c
100 (100-100)
14.3 (4.0-32.6)
63.6 (35.2-92.1)
6.5 (2.2-15.1)
63.6 (35.2-92.1)
NPV (95% CI)
98.4 (96.1-100)
99.20 (97.6-100)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
100 (100-100)
Accuracy (95% CI)
98.4 (96.1- 100)
99.2 (97.6-100)
90.2 (84.9-95.4)
96.9 (93.8-100)
76.2 (68.7-83.8)
96.9 (93.8-99.9)
PLR
n/c
n/c
10
30
4.1
30
NLR
1
0.1
0
0
0
0
Citation: Ide E, Maluf-Filho F, Chaves DM, Matuguma SE, Sakai P. Narrow-band imaging without magnification for detecting early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(39): 4408-4413