Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2011; 17(37): 4199-4205
Published online Oct 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199
Table 1 Clinical presentations of the two study groups n (%)
STARR n = 30 (F28)Macrogol n = 30 (F30)P value
Mean age (yr)51 ± 953 ± 13
Duration of24 (80)26 (87)0.7
constipation > 10 yr
Straining28 (93)29 (97)1
Hard stools27 (90)29 (97)0.6
Incomplete evacuation27 (90)27 (90)0.7
Anal blockage27 (90)27 (90)0.7
Digital facilitation11 (37)8 (27)0.6
< 3 BM/wk23 (77)26 (87)0.5
Laxatives27 (90)30 (100)0.2
Rectal bleeding13 (43)7 (23)0.2
Rectocele > 3 cm23 (77)15 (50)0.06
Rectal intussusception15 (50)20 (67)0.3
Table 2 Presenting symptoms in responders and non-responders to stapled trans-anal rectal resection n (%)
RespondersNon-respondersP value
Straining16 (100)12 (86)0.4
Hard stools14 (87)13 (93)0.9
Incomplete evacuation16 (100)11(78)0.2
Anal blockage15 (94)12 (86)0.9
Digital facilitation4 (25)7 (50)0.3
< 3 BM/wk13 (81)10 (71)0.8
Laxatives14 (87)13 (93)0.9
Table 3 Number of responders, degree of satisfaction, and Wexner constipation score variation during macrogol and after stapled trans-anal rectal resection treatment n (%)
MacrogolSTARRP value
Responders22 (73)16 (53)0.2
Satisfaction0.4
Total18 (60)16 (53)
Partial5 (17)9 (30)
Not satisfied7 (23)5 (17)
Δ Wexner score, mean ± SD8 ± 56 ± 5.20.1
Table 4 Defecographic findings in responders and non-responders submitted to stapled trans-anal rectal resection (mean ± SD)
VariablesBeforeAfter
Non-respondersRespondersNon-respondersResponders
Rectal diameter (cm)7.7 ± 1.47.3 ± 15.5 ± 0.95.8 ± 1.5
∆ ARA evacuation (°)16 ± 825 ± 188.1 ± 20.328 ± 16.2a
PF at rest (cm)5.1 ± 1.54.8 ± 1.34.3 ± 1.5  4.6 ± 1
PF during sqeezing (cm)1.4 ± 0.71.3 ± 0.91.8 ± 0.91.2 ± 0.8
∆ PF evacuation (cm)3.1 ± 1.63 ± 1.33.6 ± 1.13.1 ± 1.5
Rectocele (cm)3.8 ± 1.84.1 ± 0.61.1 ± 1.61.7 ± 1.5
Anal diameter (cm)1.4 ± 0.61.4 ± 0.81.3 ± 0.81.1 ± 0.4