Grattagliano I, Ubaldi E, Bonfrate L, Portincasa P. Management of liver cirrhosis between primary care and specialists. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(18): 2273-2282 [PMID: 21633593 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2273]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Piero Portincasa, MD, PhD, Department of Internal and Public Medicine, University Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11-70124 Bari, Italy. p.portincasa@semeiotica.uniba.it
Article-Type of This Article
Editorial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Child-Pugh scoring system for liver cirrhosis and related indication priority for transplantation[20]
Score
1
2
3
Bilirubin (mg/dL)
< 2
2-3
> 3
Prothrombin time (INR)
< 4 sec. (< 1.7)
4-6 sec. (1.7-2.3)
> 6 sec. (> 2.3)
Albumin (g/dL)
> 3.5
3.5-2.8
< 2.8
Ascites
Absent
Mild
Severe
Encephalopathy
Absent
Mild
Severe
Table 3 Current indications and contraindications to orthotopic liver transplantation in adult patients with liver cirrhosis
Indications
Contraindications
Advanced chronic liver failure
Relative
Child-Pugh score > 7
HIV seropositivity
Qualifying MELD score
Methadone dependence
Stage 3 hepatocellular carcinoma
Acute liver failure
Absolute
Drug, toxins or virus induced fulminant hepatitis
Extrahepatic malignant disease
AIDS
Cholangiocarcinoma
Severe, uncontrolled systemic infection
Multiorgan failure
Advanced cardiopulmonary disease
Active substance abuse
General
No alternative available treatment
No absolute contraindications
Willingness to comply with follow-up care and family assistance
Table 4 Standard objectives for an efficient out clinic care of cirrhotic patients
1 Early diagnosis of chronic liver disease. Identification of etiology
2 Identification of patients with chronic liver disease at risk of cirrhosis
3 Evaluation of patient’s general health status
4 Act on etiologic factors and on factors favoring disease progression. Identify treatment end-points and place the patient within his family and social setting
5 Promote family and cohabitants’ participation to primary prevention for infective forms (health education), secondary prevention for inherited or metabolic disorders, support and surveillance for toxic forms (alcohol)
6 Suggest health-dietetic measures and therapeutic remedies
7 Check parameters of effectiveness and control side effects of specific treatments (antiviral, phlebotomy, immune-depressants, β-blockers, etc.)
8 Identify and treat associated conditions (diabetes, osteoporosis, malnutrition, etc.)
9 Avoid administration of hepatotoxic drugs, drugs promoting renal sodium retention and central nervous system depressants
10 Promote vaccination against flu and pneumonia, including transplanted patients, and against hepatitis A and B virus
11 Supervise for complications by promoting clinical, biochemical and instrumental follow-up
12 Assist specialists in identifying candidates for liver transplantation
13 Assist the patient requiring legal problems
Table 5 Features of home assistance in patients with liver cirrhosis
Advantages
Decreased number of hospitalization and re-admissions
Decreased costs of treatments
Assist the patient within his familiar comfort
Criteria of eligibility
Identification of a clinical status allowing home stay
Identification of priority criteria
Presence of a valid family support or of an active aid system
Selection criteria
Use the Karnofsky Performance Status1 for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis and limited self-sufficiency (set to < 50%)
Table 6 Key messages for best management of cirrhotic patients
Statement
Evidencelevel
1 A compensated liver cirrhosis is suspected with abnormal liver function tests, low platelets count, and prolonged prothrombin time[63]
III
2 Ultrasonography is a reliable, non-invasive, fast, and cost-effective test working as a first-line tool for diagnosing liver cirrhosis[64]
II-III
3 Child-Pugh and MELD scores assess the prognosis of liver cirrhosis[19,20]
I
4 First-line treatment of patients with cirrhotic ascites includes diuretics and sodium restriction. Anti-aldosterone drugs are given with loop diuretics to increase diuretic response or when renal perfusion is impaired. Dietary salt intake should be restricted to approximately 88 mmol/day (2000 mg/d). Marked salt restriction can expose the risk of hyponatremia[32,37]
I
5 Removal of less than 5 liters of fluid does not appear to have a hemodynamic consequence. For larger paracentesis, albumin (6 to 8 g/L of fluid removed) can be administered. Albumin is indicated in patients with PBS to prevent renal failure, and in patients with hepatorenal syndrome. Albumin can be also used to treat refractory ascites. Its infusion at home is safe and cost-effective[37,65]
II
6 β-blockers (e.g. propranolol or nadolol) are recommended for prophylaxis of variceal bleeding at a dosage titrated to a 25 percent reduction in pulse rate[66]
I
7 Liver transplantation is the only definitive care for patients with major complications (ascites, bleeding, HCC) and/or MELD above 13[1]
I
8 Osteoporosis is an important systemic complication of end-stage liver cirrhosis. Management includes vitamin D and bisphosphonates[53]
II
9 Malnutrition is a negative and independent predictor of survival in patients with liver cirrhosis[67]
II
10 An integrated assistance of patients with liver cirrhosis has a better outcome than the management by generalists/specialists alone[61]
II
Citation: Grattagliano I, Ubaldi E, Bonfrate L, Portincasa P. Management of liver cirrhosis between primary care and specialists. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(18): 2273-2282