Chen WT, Lin CY, Sheen IS, Huang CW, Lin TN, Lin CJ, Jeng WJ, Huang CH, Ho YP, Chiu CT. MELD score can predict early mortality in patients with rebleeding after band ligation for variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(16): 2120-2125 [PMID: 21547132 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i16.2120]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yu-Pin Ho, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fu-Shin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taipei, Taiwan, China. hoyupin@gmail.com
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2011; 17(16): 2120-2125 Published online Apr 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i16.2120
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with rebleeding after endoscopic variceal band ligation for esophageal varices bleeding (mean ± SD) n (%)
Variable
Overall (n = 128)
Sex (male/female)
107 (83.6)/21 (16.4)
Age (yr)
53.6 ± 13.9
Etiology
Virus
61 (47.7)
Alcohol
31 (24.2)
Virus + alcohol
28 (21.9)
Others
8 (6.2)
Index EGD finding
Active EV bleeding
39 (30.5)
Blood in lumen
49 (38.3)
Clean
40 (31.2)
Duration between rebleeding and Index EVL
14.0 (10.8)
1-5 d
33 (25.8)
6-42 d
95 (74.2)
Index EVL
CTP score
9.8 ± 2.3
CTP classification
A
12 (9.40)
B
44 (34.4)
C
72 (56.2)
MELD
19.8 ± 8.9
Rebleeding
CTP score
10.1 ± 2.6
CTP classification
A
14 (10.9)
B
36 (28.1)
C
78 (60.9)
MELD
21.4 ± 9.8
Table 2 Rebleeding focus, therapy and outcome of patients with rebleeding after endoscopic variceal band ligation for esophageal varices bleeding n (%)
Overall (n = 128)
Rebleeding focus
EV bleeding
75 (58.6)
Post-EVL ulcer bleeding
24 (18.8)
GV bleeding
7 (5.5)
Peptic ulcer bleeding
11 (8.6)
PHG
11 (8.6)
Therapy for rebleeding
Endoscopic and pharmacologic therapy
92 (71.9)
Pharmacologic therapy only
35 (27.3)
Surgery
1 (0.8)
Rebleeding 5-d failure
24 (18.8)
Uncontrolled bleeding and died within 5 d
8 (6.3)
Died of non-bleeding cause
2 (1.6)
Recurrent bleeding within 5 d
14 (10.9)
5-d mortality
10 (7.8)
6-wk mortality
49 (38.3)
6-wk mortality causes
Sepsis-induced multi-organ failure
26 (53.1)
GI bleeding
18 (36.7)
Liver failure
5 (10.2)
3-mo mortality
71 (55.5)
6-mo mortality
75 (58.6)
Table 3 Variables associated with 6-wk mortality in patients with rebleeding after endoscopic variceal band ligation for esophageal varices bleeding (mean ± SD) n (%)
Variable
6-wk mortality (n = 49, 38.3%)
6-wk survival (n = 79, 61.7%)
P-value
Sex (male/female)
40 (81.6)/9 (18.8)
67 (84.8)/12 (17.6)
0.637
Age (yr)
53.3 ± 13.3
53.7 ± 14.3
0.866
Etiology
0.683
Virus
23 (46.9)
38 (48.1)
Alcohol
11 (22.4)
20 (25.3)
Virus + alcohol
13 (26.5)
15 (19.0)
Others
2 (4.1)
6 (7.6)
HCC
0.291
No or small
29 (59.2)
54 (68.4)
Advanced
20 (40.8)
25 (31.6)
PVT
0.786
Main trunk
12 (24.5)
18 (22.8)
Branch
5 (10.2)
9 (11.4)
Duration between rebleeding and index EVL
12.8 ± 9.0
14.7 ± 11.7
0.528
1-5 d
13 (26.5)
20 (25.3)
0.879
6-42 d
36 (73.5)
59 (74.7)
Rebleeding laboratory findings
CTP score
11.9 ± 1.9
8.9 ± 2.3
0.000
CTP classification
A
1 (2.0)
13 (16.5)
0.017
B
3 (6.1)
33 (41.8)
0.000
C
45 (91.8)
33 (41.8)
0.000
MELD score
28.9 ± 9.0
16.8 ± 7.0
0.000
HE (grade)
1.3 ± 1.5
0.3 ± 0.8
0.000
Cr (μmol/L)
203.3 ± 159.1
114.9 ± 97.2
0.000
Na (mmol/L)
138.7 ± 9.6
134.6 ± 14.3
0.084
K (mmol/L)
4.2 ± 1.0
3.9 ± 0.9
0.171
Bil (μmol/L)
263.3 ± 236.0
90.6 ± 135.1
0.000
Alb (g/L)
25 ± 5
29 ± 6
0.000
Hb (g/L)
83 ± 18
90 ± 17
0.041
WBC (109/L)
12.5 ± 6.4
8.2 ± 4.7
0.000
Platelets (109/L)
102.4 ± 69.2
101.0 ± 72.3
0.915
INR (PT)
2.2 ± 0.9
1.5 (0.4)
0.000
Rebleeding 5-d failure
18 (36.7)
6 (7.6)
0.000
Died within 5 d
10
0
0.000
Recurrent bleeding within 5 d
8
6
0.150
Hypovolemic shock
21 (42.9)
3 (3.8)
0.000
Rebleeding focus
0.500
EV bleeding
28 (57.1)
47 (59.5)
Post-EVL ulcer bleeding
9 (18.4)
15 (19.0)
GV bleeding
3 (6.1)
4 (5.1)
Peptic ulcer bleeding
6 (12.2)
5 (6.3)
PHG
3 (6.1)
8 (10.1)
Rebleeding EGD finding
0.019
Active bleeding
20 (40.8)
30 (38.0)
Blood in lumen
25 (51.0)
27 (34.2)
Clean
4 (8.2)
22 (27.8)
EGD Tx
0716
Endoscopic therapy + medical
36 (73.5)
56 (70.9)
Medical therapy only
13 (26.5)
22 (27.8)
Surgery
0 (0.0)
1 (1.3)
Rebleeding infection
42 (85.7)
36 (45.6)
0.000
Rebleeding antibiotic use
35 (71.4)
46 (58.2)
0.132
Rebleeding Inderal use
8 (16.3)
37 (46.8)
0.000
Table 4 Logistic regression models for variables associated with 6-wk mortality in patients with rebleeding after endoscopic variceal band ligation for esophageal varices bleeding
Variables
UV
MV
Estimate
P-value
Estimate
OR
95% CI
P-value
Rebleeding laboratory
CTP score
0.61
< 0.001
MELD score
0.17
< 0.001
0.16
1.17
1.10-1.25
< 0.001
HE (grade)
0.76
< 0.001
Cr
0.61
0.001
Bil
0.09
< 0.001
Alb
-1.18
0.001
Hb
-0.23
0.045
WBC
0.15
< 0.001
INR (PT)
1.85
< 0.001
Rebleeding 5-d failure
1.96
< 0.001
Hypovolemic shock
2.94
< 0.001
2.23
9.25
1.68-50.93
0.011
Rebleeding EGD finding
-1.47
0.011
Rebleeding infection
1.97
< 0.001
Rebleeding Inderal use
-1.51
0.001
-1.7
0.18
0.05-0.63
0.007
Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting 6-wk mortality in patients with rebleeding after endoscopic variceal band ligation for esophageal varices bleeding n (%)
6-wk mortality
Sensitivity
Specificity
PPV
NPV
MELD score ≥ 21.5
77.55
81.01
71.7
85.33
Hypovolemic shock (+)
42.86
96.20
87.5
26.92
Beta-blocker use after rebleeding
83.67
46.84
49.4
82.22
Citation: Chen WT, Lin CY, Sheen IS, Huang CW, Lin TN, Lin CJ, Jeng WJ, Huang CH, Ho YP, Chiu CT. MELD score can predict early mortality in patients with rebleeding after band ligation for variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(16): 2120-2125