Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2011; 17(13): 1753-1758
Published online Apr 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i13.1753
Published online Apr 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i13.1753
Table 1 Results of esophageal manometry in liver cirrhosis patients and controls (mean ± SD)
Group | LESP (mmHg) | PA (mmHg) | PD (s) | PV (cm/s) |
Liver cirrhosis (n = 78) | 15.32 ± 2.91a | 61.41 ± 10.52a | 5.32 ± 1.22a | 5.22 ± 1.11a |
Child A (n = 28) | 16.18 ± 2.81 | 70.52 ± 8.93a | 3.91 ± 1.03a | 4.56 ± 1.22a |
Child B (n = 27) | 15.41 ± 3.13c | 67.4 ± 9.3c | 5.11 ± 1.21c | 5.10 ± 1.02c |
Child C (n = 23) | 14.52 ± 2.91e | 56.13 ± 10.06e | 6.02 ± 1.23e | 5.91 ± 1.01e |
Control (n =30) | 16.21 ± 5.33 | 74.41 ± 17.53 | 2.70 ± 0.81 | 3.71 ± 1.82 |
Table 2 Results of ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring in liver cirrhosis patients and controls (mean ± SD)
Group | Number of acid reflux episodes | Number of acid reflux episodes lasting≥5 min | Mean time pH < 4 (%) | ||
Total | Upright | Supine | |||
Liver cirrhosis (n = 78) | 61.17 ± 33.35a | 15.25 ± 5.73a | 10.34 ± 4.45a | 5.22 ± 2.71a | 9.56 ± 3.42a |
Child A (n = 28) | 51.24 ± 20.54a | 10.66 ± 7.28a | 8.11 ± 2.32a | 4.48 ± 1.76a | 7.32 ± 5.44a |
Child B (n = 27) | 60.35 ± 18.66c | 12.35 ± 9.83c | 10.51 ± 1.62c | 5.64 ± 1.31c | 9.14 ± 4.37c |
Child C (n = 23) | 73.52 ± 28.63e | 17.34 ± 12.46e | 12.34 ± 2.15e | 6.79 ± 1.51e | 11.56 ± 5.43e |
Child D (n = 30) | 39.62 ± 29.32 | 4.81 ± 2.04 | 2.35 ± 1.53 | 3.58 ± 1.34 | 8.69 ± 3.45 |
Table 3 Results of ambulatory 24-h esophageal bilirubin monitoring in liver cirrhosis patients and controls (mean ± SD)
Group | Number of bile reflux episodes | Number of bile reflux episodes lasting≥5 min | Mean time Abs > 0.14 (%) | ||
Total | Upright | Supine | |||
Liver cirrhosis (n = 78) | 36.53 ± 9.31a | 4.09 ± 1.15a | 6.73 ± 1.15a | 3.32 ± 1.05a | 4.37 ± 1.44a |
Child A (n = 28) | 27.32 ± 10.31a | 3.85 ± 1.34a | 5.12 ± 1.45a | 3.15 ± 0.92a | 4.12 ± 0.97a |
Child B (n = 27) | 39.46 ± 18.31c | 4.11 ± 1.65c | 6.54 ± 1.21c | 3.37 ± 1.13c | 5.04 ± 1.11c |
Child C (n = 23) | 48.54 ± 26.41e | 4.23 ± 2.14e | 7.32 ± 1.34e | 4.28 ± 1.22e | 5.52 ± 1.12e |
Control (n = 30) | 12.76 ± 6.97 | 2.15 ± 1.36 | 1.98 ± 0.86 | 1.03 ± 0.23 | 0.83 ± 0.62 |
Table 4 Relationship between liver function classification of cirrhotic patients and gastroesophageal reflux disease n (%)
Group | RE | Abnormal reflux |
Child A (n = 28) | 8 (28.57) | 12 (42.86) |
Child B (n = 27) | 11 (40.74) | 15 (55.56) |
Child C (n = 23) | 10 (43.48) | 16 (69.57) |
Total (n = 78) | 29 (37.18) | 43 (55.13) |
Table 5 Abnormal reflux in liver cirrhosis patients
Group | Isolated abnormal acid reflux | Isolated abnormal bile reflux | Mixed abnormal reflux | No abnormal reflux |
Child A (n = 28) | 4 | 3 | 5 | 16 |
Child B (n = 27) | 3 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
Child C (n = 23) | 3 | 4 | 9 | 7 |
Total (n = 78) | 10 (12.82%) | 11 (14.10%) | 22 (28.21%) | 35 (44.87%) |
- Citation: Zhang J, Cui PL, Lv D, Yao SW, Xu YQ, Yang ZX. Gastroesophageal reflux in cirrhotic patients without esophageal varices. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(13): 1753-1758
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i13/1753.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i13.1753