Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2010; 16(7): 881-885
Published online Feb 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.881
Table 1 Risk factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma n (%)
Risk factorsGroup I (n = 40)Group II (n = 277)P value
HBV infection34 (85.0)120 (43.3)0.000
HCV infection0 (0.0)1 (0.4)0.703
Liver cirrhosis0.038
Related to HBV16 (40.0)68 (24.5)0.347
Related to alcohol0 (0.0)6 (2.2)0.392
Other causes0 (0.0)5 (1.8)
Total16 (40.0)79 (28.52)
Hepatolithiasis0 (0.0)25 (9.0)0.000
Liver schistosomiasis0 (0.0)16 (5.8)0.119
Table 2 Comparison of clinical features of ICC between the two groups n (%)
Group I (n = 40)Group II (n = 277)P value
Gender (M/F)30/10193/840.491
ALT (> 42 U/L)15 (60.00)89 (32.13)0.499
AST (> 37 U/L)12 (30.00)103 (37.18)0.377
TBIL (> 20 μmol/L)7 (17.50)62 (22.38)0.484
Albumin (g/L)43.82 ± 4.2742.07 ± 5.120.236
GGT (> 64 U/L)19 (47.50)176 (63.54)0.051
ALP (> 119 U/L)15 (11.19)134 (48.38)0.198
AFP (> 400 μg/L)7 (17.50)17 (6.14)0.011
CA19-9 (> 37 U/mL)14 (35.00)153 (55.23)0.017
Table 3 Comparison of pathological features of ICC between the two groups n (%)
Group I (n = 40)Group II (n = 277)P value
Tumor location0.827
Right lobe25 (6.25)160 (57.76)
Left lobe14 (35.00)111 (40.07)
Both lobes1 (2.50)6 (15.00)
Tumor size (cm)6.80 ± 3.926.67 ± 3.380.892
Tumor number0.474
136 (90.00)258 (93.14)
≥ 24 (10.00)19 (6.86)
Histological inflammation15 (37.50)47 (16.97)0.002
Capsule5 (12.50)35 (12.64)0.981
Tumor differentiation0.506
Well0 (0.00)9 (3.25)
Moderate29 (72.50)191 (68.95)
Poor11 (27.50)71 (25.63)
Microvascular invasion10 (25.00)41 (14.80)0.101
Perineural infiltration0 (0.00)4 (1.44)0.444
Portal vein invasion3 (7.50)30 (10.83)0.519
Lymphatic metastasis8 (20.00)46 (16.61)0.594
Microscopic satellite lesion7 (17.50)69 (24.91)0.305
Immunohistochemical examinations
Ck18 positive38 (95.00)269 (97.11)0.475
Ck19 positive40 (100.00)267 (93.39)0.222