Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2010; 16(5): 588-595
Published online Feb 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i5.588
Table 1 Lesion characteristics
Lesion description and evaluationn (%)
Total number of lesions26
Locations
Rectum15 (58)
Left colon4 (15)
Transverse colon1 (4)
Right colon6 (23)
Size (mm)
Mean49
40-5018 (65)
50-602 (8)
> 606 (27)
Paris classification
0-Is9 (34)
0-IIa15 (58)
0-IIb1 (4)
0-IIc1 (4)
Kudo’s classification
III (L+s)2 (8)
IV24 (92)
Anatomopathology
Tubulous8 (31)
Villous11 (42)
Tubulovillous7 (27)
Low-grade dysplasia9 (35)
High-grade dysplasia10 (38)
In situ carcinoma5 (19)
Intramucosal carcinoma (type m2)2 (8)
Submucosal-invading carcinoma0
Table 2 Lesion characteristics and treatment of recurrence
CaseLocationSize (cm)Kudo’sAspectHistological typeRelapse interval time (mo)Number of endoscopic treatmentsFinal treatment
1Rectum10IV0-IsDHG32Argon plasma
2Right colon6IV0-IIbDBG61Argon plasma
3Rectum4IV0-IIa + 0-IIcDBG33Surgery
Table 3 Resection of large sessile polyps via fragmentation: recurrence rates and efficacy
AuthorYrnSessile lesions (%)Size (cm)Piecemeal (%)SurveillanceRelapse (%)Endoscopic efficacy (%)
Bedogni et al[48]19866675≥ 31003-85 mo11-
Walsh et al[49]199265100≥ 31002.8 mo2888
Binmoeller et al[50]1996170733-6100> 6 mo16-
Kanamori et al[4]1996321003-8.5762.4 yr0100
Iishi et al[27]2000561002-57534 mo3983
Higaki et al[29]2003241002-67924 mo22.291.3
Doniec et al[21]2003184763-≥ 1310040 mo3-
Seitz et al[28]200328878> 310036 mo17-
Hurlstone et al[23]200458100> 1.56224 mo1796
Bories et al[51]2006501001-> 555.817.3 mo15-
Katsinelos et al[52]200659100≥ 261> 1 yr3.496.78
Arebi et al[31]20071611002-> 81009.2 mo-95.4