Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2010; 16(44): 5523-5535
Published online Nov 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5523
Published online Nov 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5523
Endotoxin model |
Advantages |
Endotoxins play a significant role in the pathogenesis of sepsis |
Simple model |
Using sublethal doses, providing active resuscitation, using continuous infusion and the use of intraperitoneal injection are four measures reproducing more accurately the human situation |
Lipopolysaccharides is stable (compared to the use of bacteria), therefore the model is more accurate and reproducible compared to the bacterial infection models |
Disadvantages |
Exaggerated release of host cytokines |
Most of the time only Gram-negative sepsis |
Single toxin does not mimic human sepsis |
Therapies shown to be effective in animal models, failed in clinical trials |
Rats are very resistant compared to humans |
Lack of an infectious focus |
Bacterial infection model |
Advantages |
Endotoxins play a significant role in the pathogenesis of sepsis |
Reduction of the dose, increasing the infusion time, giving active resuscitation can prolong survival and render the model more comparable to the human situation |
Disadvantages |
Uncommon clinical occurrence |
High doses of bacteria are needed |
Significant interlaboratory variability |
Survival is short |
Serum cytokine responses are transient and exaggerated |
Peritonitis model: cecal ligation puncture model |
Advantages |
Resemblance to clinical situation |
Peritoneal contamination with a mixed flora |
The cytokine response is comparable to human situation |
Severity can be adjusted by increasing the needle puncture size or the number of punctures, delaying mortality over several days |
Disadvantages |
The model needs a surgical procedure that by itself may induce ileus |
Difficult to control the magnitude of septic challenge |
Variability within the cecal ligation puncture model |
- Citation: De Winter BY, De Man JG. Interplay between inflammation, immune system and neuronal pathways: Effect on gastrointestinal motility. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(44): 5523-5535
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i44/5523.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5523