Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2010; 16(43): 5452-5456
Published online Nov 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i43.5452
Published online Nov 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i43.5452
Parameter | Value |
Total No. of patients (n) | 71 |
Males, n (%) | 40 (56.3) |
Age (yr), mean ± SD, (range) | 51.9 ± 12.0 (33-81) |
Indication for colonoscopy, n (%) | |
Follow-up of a previous polypectomy | 11 (15.5) |
Search for faecal occult blood | 21 (29.5) |
Familiar history of colon neoplasms | 39 (54.9) |
Parameter | Endotics system | Standard colonoscopy | P value |
Procedures reaching cecum | 58.0 (81.6) | 67.0 (94.3) | 0.0300 |
Complete procedure, mean ± SD (min) | 45.1 ± 18.5 | 23.7 ± 7.2 | < 0.0001 |
Patients requiring sedation | 0 | 14.0 (19.7) | < 0.0001 |
Reasons | Endotics system | Standard colonoscopy |
Anal stenosis | 1 (1.4) | 0 |
Sigma stenosis | 2 (2.8) | 0 |
Dolicolon | 0 | 1 (1.4) |
System failure | 3 (4.2) | 0 |
Insufficient length of endoscopic device | 1 (1.4) | 0 |
Insufficient cleaning | 6 (8.4) | 3 (4.2) |
-
Citation: Tumino E, Sacco R, Bertini M, Bertoni M, Parisi G, Capria A. Endotics system
vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(43): 5452-5456 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i43/5452.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i43.5452