Sung CM, Hsu CM, Hsu JT, Yeh TS, Lin CJ, Chen TC, Su MY, Chiu CT. Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(41): 5252-5256 [PMID: 21049560 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i41.5252]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Cheng-Tang Chiu, MD, Chief, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 5 Fushing Street, Kweishan Shiang, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan, China. ctchiu@adm.cgmh.org.tw
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2010; 16(41): 5252-5256 Published online Nov 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i41.5252
Table 1 Extended indications for endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the treatment guidelines for gastric cancer in Japan
Differentiated type, mucosal cancer, ulcer (-), > 2 cm
Differentiated type, mucosal cancer, ulcer (+), ≤ 3 cm
Undifferentiated type, mucosal cancer, ulcer (-), ≤ 2 cm
Table 2 Clinicopathological features of 556 patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer and univariate analysis of potential risk factors of regional lymph node metastasis
Variables
Positive rate of lymph node metastasis (%)
P value
Age (yr)
0.876
< 65
40/288 (13.9)
≥ 65
36/268 (13.4)
Gender
0.012
Male
35/330 (10.6)
Female
41/226 (18.1)
Size (cm)
< 0.001
< 2
34/352 (9.7)
≥ 2
42/204 (20.6)
Endoscopic appearance
0.993
Elevated
9/65 (13.8)
Depressed
43/307 (14.0)
Flat
16/123 (13.0)
Mixed
8/61 (13.1)
Serum CEA (ng/mL)
0.152
< 5
43/336 (12.8)
≥ 5
7/32 (21.9)
Depth of invasion
< 0.001
T1a
12/293 (4.1)
T1b
64/263 (24.3)
Histology differentiation
0.759
Differentiated
41/309 (13.3)
Undifferentiated
35/247 (14.2)
Vascular invasion
< 0.001
Absence
68/546 (12.5)
Presence
8/10 (80.0)
Lymphatic involvement
< 0.001
Absence
44/517 (8.5)
Presence
32/39 (8.2)
Ulcer
0.449
Absence
22/182 (12.1)
Presence
54/374 (14.4)
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for regional lymph node metastasis
Variables
Odds ratio (95% CI)
P value
Gender (female/male)
1.49 (0.35-1.1)
0.163
Tumor size (≥ 2 cm/< 2 cm)
2.28 (1.20-4.17)
0.008
Vascular invasion (yes/no)
1.86 (0.23-12.65)
0.598
Lymphatic invasion (yes/no)
27.2 (10.3-74.8)
< 0.001
Depth of invasion (T1b/T1a)
4.91 (2.44-9.89)
< 0.001
Table 4 Incidence of lymph node metastasis in our patients fulfilled the criteria used in endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer in Japan
Criteria
Patient number with lymph node metastasis/total patient
Incidence (%)
Non-ulcerated, differentiated, intramucosal tumor without lymphovascular invasion, ≤ 2 cm
0/42
0
Non-ulcerated, differentiated, intramucosal tumor without lymphovascular invasion, any size
0/77
0
Ulcerated, intramucosal tumor, without lymphovascular invasion, ≤ 3 cm
0/78
0
Non-ulcerated, undifferentiated intramucosal tumor without lymphovascular invasion, ≤ 2 cm
3/35
8.6
Citation: Sung CM, Hsu CM, Hsu JT, Yeh TS, Lin CJ, Chen TC, Su MY, Chiu CT. Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(41): 5252-5256