Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2010; 16(41): 5195-5202
Published online Nov 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i41.5195
Published online Nov 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i41.5195
Demographic and clinicopathological parameters | Patients with ESCC |
Sex | |
Male | 165 (72.7) |
Female | 62 (27.3) |
Age (yr) | |
Median | 58 |
Range | 33-77 |
Tumor size (cm) | 4.92 ± 2.046 |
Tumor grade | |
Grade 1 | 57 (25.1) |
Grade 2 | 114 (50.2) |
Grade 3 | 56 (24.7) |
Tumor location | |
Upper | 25 (11.0) |
Middle | 152 (67.0) |
Lower | 50 (22.0) |
Depth of invasion | |
T2 | 88 (38.8) |
T3 | 139 (61.2) |
AJCC staging system (7th ed) | |
IB | 12 (5.3) |
IIA | 83 (36.6) |
IIB | 132 (58.1) |
Parameters of ESCC patients | n | Expression of β-catenin | P-value | |
Low | High | |||
Sex | ||||
Male | 165 | 57 (34.5) | 108 (65.5) | 0.354 |
Female | 62 | 26 (41.9) | 36 (58.1) | |
Age (yr) | ||||
≤ 60 | 138 | 49 (35.5) | 89 (64.5) | 0.778 |
> 60 | 89 | 34 (38.2) | 55 (61.8) | |
Tumor size (cm) | ||||
≤ 5.0 | 155 | 54 (34.8) | 101 (65.2) | 0.461 |
> 5.0 | 72 | 29 (40.3) | 43 (59.7) | |
Tumor grade | ||||
Grade 1 | 57 | 17 (29.8) | 40 (70.2) | |
Grade 2 | 114 | 44 (38.6) | 70 (61.4) | 0.473 |
Grade 3 | 56 | 22 (39.3) | 34 (60.7) | |
Tumor location | ||||
Upper | 25 | 11 (44.0) | 14 (56.0) | |
Middle | 152 | 52 (34.2) | 100 (65.8) | 0.545 |
Lower | 50 | 20 (40.0) | 30 (60.0) | |
Depth of invasion | ||||
T2 | 88 | 34 (38.6) | 54 (61.4) | 0.672 |
T3 | 139 | 49 (35.3) | 90 (64.7) | |
AJCC staging system (7th ed) | ||||
IB | 12 | 3 (25.0) | 9 (75.0) | |
IIA | 83 | 31 (37.3) | 52 (62.7) | 0.694 |
IIB | 132 | 49 (37.1) | 83 (62.9) |
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value | |
Age (yr) | ||||||
≤ 60 vs > 60 | 1.023 | 0.740-1.414 | 0.889 | |||
Gender | ||||||
Male vs female | 0.692 | 0.474-1.009 | 0.056 | |||
Tumor size (cm) | ||||||
≤ 5 vs > 5 | 0.987 | 0.704-1.386 | 0.942 | |||
Grade | ||||||
G1 vs G2 and 3 | 1.498 | 1.060-2.116 | 0.022a | 1.549 | 1.095-2.190 | 0.013a |
Tumor location | ||||||
Upper and middle vs lower | 0.954 | 0.657-1.385 | 0.804 | |||
Depth of invasion | ||||||
T2 vs T3 | 1.461 | 1.045-2.043 | 0.026a | 1.493 | 1.066-2.089 | 0.020a |
AJCC staging system (7th ed) | ||||||
IB and IIA vs IIB | 1.192 | 0.865-1.643 | 0.284 | |||
β-catenin | ||||||
Low vs high | 1.644 | 1.161-2.329 | 0.005b | 1.642 | 1.159-2.327 | 0.005b |
-
Citation: Situ DR, Hu Y, Zhu ZH, Wang J, Long H, Rong TH. Prognostic relevance of
β-catenin expression in T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(41): 5195-5202 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i41/5195.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i41.5195