Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2010; 16(38): 4858-4864
Published online Oct 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i38.4858
Published online Oct 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i38.4858
Methods | Mutant DNA/total DNA (%) | |||||||
100 | 50 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | |
Dideoxy sequencing | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No |
Pyrosequencing | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
KRAS StripAssay | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Sample No. | Mutation type | ||
Dideoxy sequencing | KRAS StripAssay | Pyrosequencing | |
5 | Wild-type | Wild-type | GGT>GAT |
11 | Wild-type | GGT>TGT | Wild-type |
14 | Wild-type | GGT>GTT | Wild-type |
29 | GGT>GTT | GGT>GTT | Wild-type |
44 | Wild-type | Wild-type | GGT>GAT |
46 | Wild-type | Wild-type | GGT>GAT |
48 | Wild-type | Wild-type | GGT>GAT |
71 | Wild-type | GGT>GCT | Wild-type |
- Citation: Gao J, Li YY, Sun PN, Shen L. Comparative analysis of dideoxy sequencing, the KRAS StripAssay and pyrosequencing for detection of KRAS mutation. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(38): 4858-4864
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i38/4858.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i38.4858