Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2010; 16(34): 4321-4328
Published online Sep 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4321
Published online Sep 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4321
Table 1 Patient data according to age and gender
Parameters | Age groups | |
≤ 40 yr | > 40 yr | |
(n = 931, 68.3%) | (n = 433, 31.7%) | |
Gender | ||
Male (n = 656) | 468 (50.2%) | 188 (43.3%) |
Female (n = 708) | 463 (49.8%) | 245 (56.7%) |
Age (yr) | ||
mean ± SD (36.8 ± 10.3) | 37.77 ± 10.65 | 46.8 ± 12.38 |
Age range (18-75) | 18-40 | 41-75 |
Table 2 Univariate logistic analysis of genotypes involved in hepatitis C virus infection according to age and gender
Variables | Type III sum of squares | υ | Mean square | F value | P value |
Sex | 150.641 | 1 | 150.641 | 2.396 | 0.122 |
Age groups | 0.084 | 1 | 0.084 | 0.001 | 0.971 |
Table 3 Hepatitis C virus genotype subtypes prevalence in age groups
Genotype subtypes | Computation | Age groups | |
≤ 40 yr | > 40 yr | ||
1a | Count | 230 | 92 |
% within age groups | 24.7% | 21.2% | |
3a | Count | 507 | 256 |
% within age groups | 54.5% | 59.1% | |
3b | Count | 32 | 11 |
% within age groups | 3.4% | 2.5% | |
4a | Count | 116 | 54 |
% within age groups | 12.5% | 12.5% | |
4b | Count | 13 | 3 |
% within age groups | 1.4% | 0.7% | |
4&5 | Count | 11 | 5 |
% within age groups | 1.2% | 1.2% | |
Untypable genotype | Count | 22 | 12 |
% within age groups | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Table 4 Univariate logistic analysis of risk factors involved in hepatitis C virus infection according to age, gender and genotypes
Variables | Type III sum of squares | υ | Mean square | F value | P value |
Sex | 0.014 | 1 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.950 |
Age | 131.744 | 1 | 131.744 | 38.219 | 0.000 |
Genotype | 457.878 | 6 | 76.313 | 22.139 | 0.000 |
Table 5 Distribution and multivariate analysis of risk factors in age groups
Risk factors | Computation | Age groups | 95% CI | P value | ||
≤ 40 yr | > 40 yr | Lower | Upper | |||
Blood transfusion | Count | 222 | 88 | 2.077 | 4.467 | 0.039 |
% within age groups | 23.8% | 20.3% | ||||
IVDU | Count | 51 | 0 | 6.414 × 109 | 6.414 × 109 | 0.000 |
% within age groups | 5.5% | 0.0% | ||||
Sexual exposure | Count | 79 | 0 | 9.014 × 109 | 9.014 × 109 | 0.000 |
% within age groups | 8.5% | 0.0% | ||||
Dental surgery | Count | 325 | 133 | 2.068 | 4.209 | 0.610 |
% within age groups | 34.9% | 30.7% | ||||
Road accidents | Count | 77 | 39 | 1.551 | 2.090 | 0.148 |
% within age groups | 8.3% | 9.0% | ||||
Barber shops | Count | 95 | 74 | 1.016 | 2.363 | 0.042 |
% within age groups | 10.2% | 17.1% |
Table 6 Hepatitis C virus genotype prevalence within risk factors in Lahore - March 2007 - September 2009 (n = 1364) n (%)
Groups | Total No. | 1a | 3a | 3b | 4a | 4b | Mix | Untypable |
BT | 310 | 51 (16.5) | 202 (65.2) | 13 (4.2) | 23 (7.4) | 4 (1.3) | 4 (1.3) | 13 (4.2) |
≤ 40 yr | 222 | 39 (17.6) | 131 (59.0) | 10 (4.5) | 22 (9.9) | 3 (1.4) | 4 (1.8) | 13 (5.9) |
> 40 yr | 88 | 12 (13.6) | 71 (80.7) | 3 (3.4) | 1 (1.1) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
IVDU | 51 | 12 (23.5) | 34 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (7.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.0) |
≤ 40 yr | 51 | 12 (23.5) | 34 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (7.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.0) |
> 40 yr | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
SE | 79 | 14 (17.7) | 53 (67.1) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (12.7) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) |
≤ 40 yr | 79 | 14 (17.7) | 53 (67.1) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (12.7) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) |
> 40 yr | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
DS | 458 | 85 (18.6) | 285 (62.2) | 13 (2.8) | 62 (13.5) | 5 (1.1) | 4 (0.9) | 4 (0.9) |
≤ 40 yr | 325 | 69 (21.2) | 173 (53.2) | 13 (4.0) | 58 (17.8) | 5 (1.5) | 3 (0.9) | 4 (1.2) |
> 40 yr | 133 | 16 (12.0) | 112 (84.2) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) |
RA | 116 | 30 (25.9) | 68 (58.6) | 4 (3.4) | 11 (9.5) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) |
≤ 40 yr | 77 | 30 (39.0) | 46 (59.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) |
> 40 yr | 39 | 0 (0.0) | 22 (56.4) | 4 (10.3) | 11 (28.2) | 1 (2.6) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) |
BS | 169 | 45 (26.6) | 88 (52.1) | 7 (4.1) | 19 (11.2) | 1 (0.6) | 5 (3.0) | 4 (2.4) |
≤ 40 yr | 95 | 19 (20.0) | 64 (67.4) | 7 (7.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.2) | 2 (2.1) |
> 40 yr | 74 | 26 (35.1) | 24 (32.4) | 0 (0.0) | 19 (25.7) | 1 (1.4) | 2 (2.7) | 2 (2.7) |
UN | 181 | 85 (47.0) | 33 (18.2) | 6 (3.3) | 41 (22.7) | 4 (2.2) | 2 (1.1) | 10 (5.5) |
≤ 40 yr | 82 | 47 (57.3) | 6 (7.3) | 2 (2.4) | 22 (26.8) | 4 (4.9) | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0.0) |
> 40 yr | 99 | 38 (38.4) | 27 (27.3) | 4 (4.0) | 19 (19.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 10 (10.1) |
Total | 1364 | 322 (23.6) | 763 (55.9) | 43 (3.2) | 170 (12.5) | 16 (1.2) | 16 (1.2) | 34 (2.5) |
- Citation: Ahmad W, Ijaz B, Javed FT, Jahan S, Shahid I, Khan FM, Hassan S. HCV genotype distribution and possible transmission risks in Lahore, Pakistan. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(34): 4321-4328
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i34/4321.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4321