Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2010; 16(31): 3970-3978
Published online Aug 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3970
Published online Aug 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3970
Table 1 Methodological characteristics of the clinical trials included in this meta-analysis
Trial | Patients (synbiotics/control) | Characteristics of patients (synbiotics/control) | Intervention | Control group | Length of treatment (d) |
Oláh et al[16] (UK, 2002) | 45 (22/23) | Mean Glasgow score (2.5/2.8), mean CRP (206.5/188.7) mg/L | 109L. plantarum 299 + EN + 10 g oat fiber | EN + heat-killed L. plantarum 299 + oat fiber | 7 |
Oláh et al[17] (UK, 2007) | 62 (33/29) | Mean Imrie score (2.9/3.1), mean CRP (216.7/191.2) mg/L | Four LAB: 1010P. pentosaceus, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, L. paracasei and L. plantarum + four bioactive fiber (Synbiotics 2000) + EN | EN + four bioactive fiber | 7 |
Karakan et al[25] (Turkey, 2007) | 30 (15/15) | Mean APACHE II score (9.4/9.6), mean CRP (232/244) mg/L | 24 g multi-fibers including soluble fibers and insoluble fibers + EN | EN | 6-13 |
Qin et al[18] (China, 2008) | 74 (36/38) | Mean APACHE II score (8.8/8.9), mean CRP (125/136) mg/L | 108L. plantarum + EN + PN | PN | 7 |
Besselink et al[19] (Netherlands, 2008) | 296 (152/144) | Mean APACHE II score (8.6/8.4), mean Imrie score (3.3/3.4), mean CRP (268/270) mg/L | Six LAB: 1010L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. salivarius, L.lactis, B. bifidum, and B. lactis (Ecologic 641) + cornstarch + maltodextrins + fiber-riched EN | Cornstarch + maltodextrins + fiber-riched EN | 28 |
Li et al[26] (China, 2007) | 25 (14/11) | APACHE II score 8-20 | Three LAB:7.2 × 107B. longum, L. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus (Golden Bifid) | Water | 7 |
Wu et al[27] (China, 2009) | 27 (14/13) | APACHE II score 8-20 | Three strains: > 6 × 104L. lactis + L. acidophilus and S. lactis | N/A | 7 |
Table 2 Surgical outcomes from randomized studies included in this meta-analysis
Trial | No. of patients | Septic morbidity (%) | MOF (%) | SIRS (%) | Pancreatic infections (%) | Surgical interventions (%) | Hospital stay (d) | Mortality (%) |
Oláh et al[16] | 22/23 | 5 (22.7)/ 20 (87) | 2 (9.1)/ 2 (8.7) | 11 (50)/ 6 (26.1) | 1 (4.5)/ 7 (30.4) | 1 (4.5)/ 7 (30.4) | 13.7/21.4 (median) | 1 (4.5)/2 (8.7) |
Oláh et al[17] | 33/29 | 9 (27.3)/ 15 (51.7) | 5 (15.1)/ 9 (31) | 3 (9)/ 5 (17.2) | 4 (12.1)/ 8 (27.6) | 4 (12.1)/ 7 (24.1) | 14.9/19.7 (median) | 2 (6.1)/6 (20.7) |
Karakan et al[25] | 15/15 | 2 (13.3)/ 2 (13.3) | 1 (6.7)/ 2 (13.3) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10 ± 4/15 ± 6 | 2 (13.3)/4 (26.7) |
Qin et al[18] | 36/38 | 11 (30.6)/ 29 (76.3) | 4 (11.1)/ 7 (18.4) | 6 (16.7)/ 14 (36.8) | N/A | N/A | 20.9/24.2 (median) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
Besselink et al[19] | 152/144 | 46 (30.3)/ 41 (28.47) | 33 (22)/ 15 (10) | N/A | 21 (14)/ 14 (10) | 28 (18)/ 14 (10) | 28.9 ± 41.5/23.5 ± 25.9 | 24 (16)/9 (6) |
Li et al[26] | 14/11 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 42 ± 5/49 ± 6.8 | N/A |
Wu et al[27] | 14/13 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 34 ± 6/40 ± 6 | 5 (35.7)/6 (46.2) |
Table 3 Quality assessment of the included randomized trials
Trial | Generation of random | Allocation concealment | Blinding | Follow-up | Baseline similarity | Jadad score |
Oláh et al[16] | Unclear | Unclear | Double blinded | No | Similar | 4 |
Oláh et al[17] | Unclear | Adequate | Double blinded | No | Similar | 4 |
Karakan et al[25] | Clear | Adequate | Double blinded | No | Similar | 3 |
Qin et al[18] | Clear | Unclear | No blinding | Yes | Similar | 3 |
Besselink et al[19] | Clear | Adequate | Double blinded | Yes | Similar | 5 |
Li et al[26] | Unclear | Unclear | No blinding | No | Similar | 1 |
Wu et al[27] | Unclear | Unclear | No blinding | No | Similar | 1 |
Table 4 Surgical outcomes stratified by severity of pancreatitis in this meta-analysis
No. of studies | Synbiotic | Control | OR (95% CI) | P for effect size | P for heterogeneity | |
Septic morbidity | 3 | 57/200 | 58/188 | 0.89 (0.57, 1.37) | 0.58 | 0.16 |
Pancreatic infections | 2 | 25/185 | 22/173 | 1.06 (0.58, 1.96) | 0.84 | 0.07 |
Surgical intervention | 2 | 32/185 | 21/173 | 1.07 (0.23, 4.92) | 0.94 | 0.04 |
MOF and SIRS | 3 | 43/200 | 36/188 | 0.65 (0.09, 4.44) | 0.66 | 0.0005 |
Mortality | 4 | 33/214 | 25/201 | 0.77 (0.22, 2.72) | 0.69 | 0.02 |
- Citation: Zhang MM, Cheng JQ, Lu YR, Yi ZH, Yang P, Wu XT. Use of pre-, pro- and synbiotics in patients with acute pancreatitis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(31): 3970-3978
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i31/3970.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3970