Original Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2010; 16(22): 2764-2770
Published online Jun 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i22.2764
Table 1 Clinical profiles and tumor characteristics according to the histological subtypes
Histological subtypeGender
Age at operation (yr)Tumor site
Tumor size (cm)
MaleFemaleUML< 5> 5
DAC (n = 38)281058912171721
SIG (n = 9)3a6a6221636
Non-SIG (n = 48)242465727141434
Table 2 Expression rates of the various mucin phenotypes at the intramucosal layer among patients classified according to the histological subtype
Antigen/histological subtypeHGM (%)MUC5AC (%)MUC6 (%)M-GGMC-1 (%)MUC2 (%)CD10 (%)
DAC (n = 38)97958490ab76c0
SIG (n = 9)100100d5644ad33c0
Non-SIG (n = 48)9698e6552be560
Table 3 Expression rates of the various mucin phenotypes at the intramucosal layer of gastric adenocarcinomas according to the histological subtypes n (%)
Mucin phenotype/histological subtypeGGIIUC
DAC (n = 38)9/38 (24)29/38 (76)ab0/38 (0)0/38 (0)
SIG (n = 9)6/9 (67)3/9 (33)a0/9 (0)0/9 (0)
Non-SIG (n = 48)19/48 (40)27/48 (56)b0/48 (0)2/48 (4)
Table 4 Comparisons between the expression of G and GI phenotypes in clinical profiles, tumor site and tumor size, metastasis rate, and histological findings, according to the histological subtype
Histological subtypeDAC
SIG
Non-SIG
Mucin phenotypeG (n = 9)GI (n = 29)G (n = 6)GI (n = 3)G (n = 19)GI (n = 27)
Male:female6:312:170:6a3:0a9:1010:17
Mean age (yr)57.260.363.255.368.260.9
Tumor site
U272025
M21001918
L5124284
Tumor size (cm)
< 5317309b3b
> 56123310b24b
Metastasis rate (expression rate, %)
Lymph node67458310042c81c
Other site22350331119
Histological findings (expression rate, %)
Vessel invasion6769671008493
Lymph invasion100868310095100