Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2009; 15(18): 2265-2269
Published online May 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2265
Published online May 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2265
Table 1 Basal characteristics of 17 consecutive patients
Case no. | Gender | Age | Symptoms | Duration (d) | Comorbidity | Type of bezoar | Endoscopic findings | Size of bezoar |
CD group | ||||||||
1 | F | 69 | Indigestion | 21 | None | Phytobezoar | GU | Above 50% |
2 | F | 62 | Epigastric soreness | 21 | DM | Phytobezoar | GU | Above 50% |
3 | F | 49 | Indigestion, epigastric soreness | 14 | DM | Phytobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
4 | F | 51 | Indigestion | 20 | DM | Phytobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
PD group | ||||||||
5 | M | 48 | Epigastric soreness | 8 | None | Phytobezoar | DU scar with stenosis | Below 50% |
6 | F | 57 | Indigestion | 21 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
7 | M | 71 | Indigestion | 90 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
8 | F | 65 | Epigastric soreness | 10 | HTN | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
9 | F | 61 | Indigestion | 14 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
10 | F | 57 | Indigestion | 21 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
11 | F | 67 | Epigastric soreness | 60 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
12 | M | 63 | Epigastric soreness | 21 | HTN | Phytobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
13 | M | 78 | Indigestion | 30 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Above 50% |
14 | F | 75 | Epigastric soreness | 90 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | None | Below 50% |
15 | F | 54 | None | 7 | HTN | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
16 | F | 61 | Nausea and vomiting | 7 | None | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
17 | M | 63 | Epigastric soreness | 30 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
Table 2 Results of cola administration and endoscopic intervention
Case no. | Initial methodof colaadministration | Methods ofendoscopic treatment | Endoscopicprocedure time (min) | No. ofendoscopicsessions (n) | No. of used instruments(n) | Total amount of administered cola (liters) | Hospitalstay (d) |
CD group | |||||||
1 | 3 L drink | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||
2 | 3 L lavage | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 L lavage | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | ||
4 | 3 L lavage | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||
PD group | |||||||
5 | 3 L drink | Mechanical lithotripsy | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
6 | 3 L lavage | Mechanical lithotripsy | 45 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
7 | 3 L drink | Mechanical lithotripsy | 14 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
8 | 3 L lavage | Mechanical lithotripsy | 44 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
9 | 3 L drink | Mechanical lithotripsy | 62 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 |
10 | 3 L lavage | Mechanical lithotripsy | 42 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
11 | 3 L lavage | Mechanical lithotripsy | 50 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
12 | 3 L lavage | Mechanical lithotripsy | 30 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
13 | 3 L lavage | Polypectomy snare | 52 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 |
14 | 3 L drink | Polypectomy snare | 40 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
15 | 3 L drink | Polypectomy snare | 58 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 5 |
16 | 3 L drink | Polypectomy snare | 62 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
17 | 3 L drink | Polypectomy snare | 72 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
Table 3 Comparison of clinical characteristics between complete dissolution and partial dissolution groups
CD group (n = 4) | PD group (n = 13) | Pvalue | |
Age, range (yr) | 51-69 | 48-78 | 0.412 |
Gender (M:F) | 0:4 | 5:8 | 0.208 |
Symptom duration, range (d) | 14-21 | 7-90 | 0.624 |
Median (d) | 20 | 21 | |
Type of bezoar | 0.006 | ||
Phytobezoar | 4 | 2 | |
Diospyrobezoar | 0 | 11 | |
Size of bezoar | 0.559 | ||
Over than 50% of stomach | 2 | 5 | |
Less than 50% of stomach | 2 | 8 | |
Endoscopic findings | 0.241 | ||
GU | 3 | 5 | |
Gastric outlet stenosis | 1 | 8 | |
Method of administration of cola | 0.441 | ||
Lavage | 3 | 6 | |
Oral drink | 1 | 7 |
Table 4 Summary of cases for gastric phytobezoar treated with cola
Author | Type of bezoars | No. of cases | Methods of administration of Coca-cola | Duration of Coca-cola |
Ladas et al[6] | Phytobezoar | 5 | 3 L of Coca-cola lavage | 12 h |
Kato et al[7] | Diospyrobezoars | 1 | 3 L of Coca-cola lavage | 12 h |
Chung et al[8] | Diospyrobezoars | 1 | Injection of 30 mL of Coca-cola and drinking 4 L of Coca-cola | 2 d |
Lin et al[9] | Diospyrobezoars | 1 | Injection and irrigation with 1 can of Coca-cola + oral drink of 1 can | |
Okamoto et al[10] | Diospyrobezoars | 1 | Drinking 500 mL of Coca-cola per day | 7 d |
Sechopoulos et al[11] | Stump of vegetables | 1 | 2 cans of Coca-cola injection | |
Whitson et al[12] | Phytobezoar | 1 | Drinking 5 L of Coca-cola per day | 5 d |
- Citation: Lee BJ, Park JJ, Chun HJ, Kim JH, Yeon JE, Jeen YT, Kim JS, Byun KS, Lee SW, Choi JH, Kim CD, Ryu HS, Bak YT. How good is cola for dissolution of gastric phytobezoars? World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(18): 2265-2269
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i18/2265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2265