Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2008; 14(32): 5073-5077
Published online Aug 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5073
Published online Aug 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5073
Table 1 Levels of Alb, TSF and pre-Alb at different time points in the two groups (mean ± SD)
Time | Alb (g/L) | TSF (g/L) | Pre-Alb (mg/L) | ||||||
A | B | P | A | B | P | A | B | P | |
1 d before treatment | 40 ± 2.1 | 39 ± 3.2 | 0.11 | 3.51 ± 0.17 | 3.49 ± 0.14 | 0.78 | 340 ± 51 | 341 ± 28 | 0.64 |
1 d after treatment | 39 ± 3.6 | 37 ± 2.5 | 0.06 | 3.27 ± 0.26 | 3.18 ± 0.21 | 0.26 | 327 ± 43 | 308 ± 19 | 0.15 |
15 d after treatment | 37 ± 2.7 | 35 ± 3.5 | 0.05 | 3.20 ± 0.33 | 2.98 ± 0.25 | 0.45 | 321 ± 37 | 271 ± 21 | 0.001 |
30 d after treatment | 38 ± 3.8 | 33 ± 3.2 | 0.001 | 3.28 ± 0.35 | 2.77 ± 0.22 | 0.001 | 325 ± 24 | 236 ± 17 | 0.001 |
Table 2 Nitrogen balance between the two groups at different time points (mean ± SD)
Time | Nitrogen balance (g) | ||
A | B | P | |
1 d before treatment | -10 ± 3.6 | -8 ± 4.1 | 0.17 |
1 d after treatment | -11 ± 2.1 | -9 ± 4.5 | 0.81 |
15 d after treatment | 2 ± 2.9 | 2 ± 3.1 | 0.95 |
30 d after treatment | 6 ± 4.2 | 5 ± 4.8 | 0.51 |
Table 3 Liver function of patients in the two groups at different time points (mean ± SD)
Time | AST (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | T bill (mol/L) | ||||||
A | B | P | A | B | P | A | B | P | |
1 d before treatment | 26 ± 2.2 | 27 ± 1.9 | 0.27 | 27 ± 1.9 | 26 ± 1.6 | 0.85 | 15 ± 1.6 | 14 ± 1.8 | 0.68 |
1 d after treatment | 28 ± 2.4 | 29 ± 2.6 | 0.31 | 29 ± 2.3 | 30 ± 2.4 | 0.24 | 18 ± 2.1 | 19 ± 2.4 | 0.14 |
15 d after treatment | 42 ± 3.5 | 44 ± 3.1 | 0.07 | 52 ± 1.8 | 60 ± 1.5 | 0.001 | 30 ± 1.4 | 32 ± 2.6 | 0.004 |
30 d after treatment | 35 ± 3.3 | 63 ± 3.6 | 0.001 | 36 ± 2.7 | 65 ± 2.3 | 0.001 | 26 ± 3.7 | 48 ± 3.1 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Complications, hospitalized time and cost of the two groups
A (n = 20) | B (n = 20) | P | |
Stoma fistula | 0 | 2 | |
Infection of incisional wound | 0 | 3 | |
Abdominal distension | 2 | 0 | |
Diarrhoea | 1 | 0 | |
Infection of abdominal cavity | 1 | 1 | |
Total incidence rate (%) | 20%(4/20) | 30%(6/20) | 0.53 |
Average stay (d) | 40 ± 2.6 | 50 ± 3.7 | 0.001 |
Average expenditure(10 thousand yuan) | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Wang Q, Liu ZS, Qian Q, Sun Q, Pan DY, He YM. Treatment of upper gastrointestinal fistula and leakage with personal stage nutrition support. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(32): 5073-5077
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i32/5073.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.5073