Tarzamni MK, Somi MH, Farhang S, Jalilvand M. Portal hemodynamics as predictors of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(12): 1898-1902 [PMID: 18350629 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.1898]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Sara Farhang, Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Imam Hospital, University Ave, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran. sfarhang@yahoo.com
Article-Type of This Article
Rapid Communication
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2008; 14(12): 1898-1902 Published online Mar 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1898
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 85 cirrhotic patients [as n (%) or mean ± SD]
Gender
Male
43 (50.6)
Female
42 (49.4)
Etiology
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)
40 (47.0)
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)
12 (14.1)
Cryptogenic
14 (16.5)
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)
17 (20.0)
Alcohol
2 (2.4)
Wilson’s disease
1 (1.2)
Size of esophageal varices
None
16 (18.8)
Small (grade I-II)
50 (58.8)
Large (grade III-IV)
19 (22.3)
Size
7.9 (± 3.4)
Gastric varices
11 (12.9)
Portal hypertrophic gastropathy
75 (88.2)
Portal vein diameter (mm)
13.5 (± 2.4)
Splenic axis (cm)
15.7 (± 3.1)
Portal vein flow (cm/s)
14.6 (± 4.8)
Splenic artery resistance
0.7 (± 0.1)
Hepatic artery resistance
0.7 (± 0.1)
Table 2 mean ± SD of the primary and derivative echo-Doppler factors in study population according to presence of esophageal varices in any size
With EV
Without EV
P value
AUC
Portal vein flow velocity (cm/s)
13.25 ± 3.66
20.25 ± 5.05
< 0.0005
0.113
Portal vein diameter (mm)
13.88 ± 2.42
12.00 ± 1.69
0.004
0.242
Hepatic artery resistance index
0.73 ± 0.07
0.66 ± 0.07
0.001
0.210
Splenic artery resistance index
0.73 ± 0.06
0.62 ± 0.08
< 0.0005
0.168
Spleen size (cm)
15.98 ± 3.01
14.76 ± 3.66
0.166
0.431
Liver vascular index
8.31 ± 2.72
17.08 ± 6.28
< 0.0005
0.114
Congestion index
0.11 ± 0.03
0.06 ± 0.03
< 0.0005
0.128
Portal hypertensive index
2.62 ± 0.79
1.33 ± 0.53
< 0.0005
0.072
Table 3 mean ± SD of the primary and derivative echo-Doppler factors according to presence of large esophageal varices
With LEV
Without LEV
P value
AUC
Portal vein flow velocity (cm/s)
12.13 ± 2.59
15.26 ± 5.06
0.001
0.715
Portal vein diameter (mm)
14.54 ± 1.48
13.24 ± 2.55
0.037
0.748
Hepatic artery resistance index
0.80 ± 0.06
0.70 ± 0.06
0.003
0.820
Splenic artery resistance index
0.76 ± 0.11
0.69 ± 0.06
< 0.0005
0.656
Spleen size (cm)
17.62 ± 3.05
15.21 ± 2.99
0.003
0.724
Liver vascular index
6.48 ± 2.78
10.96 ± 5.05
< 0.0005
0.817
Congestion index
0.14 ± 0.04
0.09 ± 0.03
< 0.0005
0.797
Portal hypertensive index
3.18 ± 0.90
2.14 ± 0.77
< 0.0005
0.791
Table 4 Logistic regression model to predict the presence of large esophageal varices in newly diagnosed patients with compensated cirrhosis
P value
Odds ratio
95% CI
Congestive index
0.252
0
-
Portal hypertensive index
0.040
4.83
1.08-21.65
Liver vascular index
0.151
0.72
-
Spleen size
0.002
1.77
1.23-2.55
Citation: Tarzamni MK, Somi MH, Farhang S, Jalilvand M. Portal hemodynamics as predictors of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(12): 1898-1902