Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2007; 13(38): 5096-5100
Published online Oct 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5096
Published online Oct 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5096
Table 1 Main parameters for postoperative pancreatic fistula grading[5]
Grade | A | B | C |
Clinical conditions | Well | Often well | Ill appearing/bad |
Specific treatment1 | No | Yes/No | Yes |
US/CT | Negative | Negative/Positive | Positive |
Persistent drainage (after 3 wk) | No | Usually yes | Yes |
Reoperation | No | No | Yes |
Death related to fistula | No | No | Possibly yes |
Signs of infection | No | Yes | Yes |
Sepsis | No | No | Yes |
Readmission | No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
Table 2 Patients’ demographics, indications for surgery, operative and technical factors
No. of patients (%) | |
Sex | |
Male | 30 (47) |
Female | 34 (53) |
Indications for surgery | |
Pancreatic | |
Cystadenoma | 19 (30) |
Adenocarcinoma | 11 (17) |
Neuroendocrine tumour | 3 (5) |
Cystadenocarcinoma | 3 (5) |
Chronic pancreatitis | 1 (1.5) |
Lymphangioma | 1 (1.5) |
Non-pancreatic | |
Gastric adenocarcinoma | 16 (25) |
Retroperitoneal sarcoma | 4 (6) |
Colonic adenocarcinoma | 2 (3) |
Renal carcinoma | 2 (3) |
Adrenal grand carcinoma | 1 (1.5) |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumour | 1 (1.5) |
Operations | |
DP + splenectomy | 13 (20) |
Spleen preserving DP | 8 (13) |
DP + splenectomy + additional procedure | 43 (67) |
Additional procedures | |
Gastrectomy | 26 (46) |
Colon resection | 12 (21) |
Adrenalectomy | 10 (17) |
Small intestine resection | 5 (9) |
Nephrectomy | 4 (7) |
Closure of pancreatic stump | |
Stapler | 29 (45) |
Suture | 35 (55) |
Table 3 Postoperative results
No. of patients (%) | |
Death | 1 (1.5) |
Reoperation | 2 (3) |
Complications | |
No | 40 (63) |
Yes | 24 (37) |
Pancreatic fistula | 14 (22) |
Grade A | 4 (28.6) |
Grade B | 9 (64.3) |
Grade C | 1 (7.1) |
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage | 2 (3) |
Intra-abdominal abscess | 3 (5) |
Pulmonary | 5 (8) |
Table 4 Incidence of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy according to examined risk factors
Fistula | ||||
Patients(n = 64) | No.(n = 50) | Yes(n = 14) | Pvalue | |
Age (yr) | NS | |||
< 70 | 23 (36) | 17 (34) | 6 (43) | |
> 70 | 41 (64) | 33 (66) | 8 (57) | |
Sex | NS | |||
Male | 30 (47) | 23 (46) | 7 (50) | |
Female | 34 (53) | 27 (53) | 7 (50) | |
Pancreatic stump closure | NS | |||
Stapler | 29 (45) | 22 (44) | 7 (50) | |
Suture | 35 (55) | 28 (56) | 7 (50) | |
Pathology | 0.04 | |||
Pancreatic disease | 38 (59) | 27 (54) | 11 (79) | |
Non-pancreatic malignancy | 26 (41) | 23 (46) | 3 (21) | |
Octreotide therapy | 0.01 | |||
Yes | 34 (53) | 30 (60) | 4 (28) | |
No | 30 (47) | 20 (40) | 10 (72) | |
Texture of pancreatic parenchyma | 0.006 | |||
Soft | 27 (42) | 15 (30) | 12 (86) | |
Fibrotic | 37 (58) | 35 (70) | 2 (14) | |
Concomitant splenectomy | 0.002 | |||
Yes | 56 (87) | 46 (92) | 10 (71) | |
No | 8 (13) | 4 (8) | 4 (29) | |
Procedures | NS | |||
Pancreatic resection only | 21 (33) | 14 (28) | 7 (50) | |
Additional procedures | 43 (67) | 36 (72) | 7 (50) |
- Citation: Ridolfini MP, Alfieri S, Gourgiotis S, Miceli DD, Rotondi F, Quero G, Manghi R, Doglietto GB. Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial? World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(38): 5096-5100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i38/5096.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5096