Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2007; 13(38): 5079-5089
Published online Oct 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5079
Published online Oct 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5079
Table 1 Comparison of different indexes level in blood [M (QR)]
Sham operation group | Model group | Baicalin treated group | Octreotide treated group | ||
Endotoxin (EU/mL) | 3 h | 0.016 (0.005) | 0.053 (0.029) | 0.027 (0.005) | 0.033 (0.006) |
6 h | 0.016 (0.010) | 0.059 (0.037) | 0.039 (0.019) | 0.031 (0.010) | |
12 h | 0.014 (0.015) | 0.060 (0.022) | 0.034 (0.015) | 0.042 (0.014) | |
BUN (mmol/L) | 3 h | 5.310 (0.940) | 12.050 (4.030) | 10.530 (3.625) | 9.850 (3.020) |
6 h | 5.500 (2.200) | 17.390 (3.850) | 12.220 (4.530) | 13.930 (5.500) | |
12 h | 4.860 (1.590) | 22.270 (11.375) | 13.720 (4.380) | 13.520 (9.810) | |
NO (μmol/L) | 3 h | 7.500 (5.000) | 65.000 (7.50) | 57.500 (22.50) | 52.500 (15.00) |
6 h | 7.500 (5.000) | 62.500 (38.75) | 47.500 (37.50) | 57.500 (15.00) | |
12 h | 74.100 (26.15) | 57.500 (27.50) | 45.000 (12.50) | ||
TNF-α (pg/mL) | 3 h | 3.900 (3.200) | 41.440 (37.72) | 44.930 (45.84) | 39.300 (30.60) |
6 h | 4.000 (1.700) | 92.150 (23.12) | 65.100 (27.51) | 47.600 (16.50) | |
12 h | 5.3000 (3.000) | 65.020 (26.81) | 47.650 (25.52) | 54.500 (41.40) | |
IL-6 (pg/mL) | 3 h | 1.846 (0.346) | 5.437 (1.025) | 3.031 (0.870) | 2.646 (1.373) |
6 h | 1.743 (0.838) | 6.817 (0.810) | 2.882 (1.392) | 3.076 (1.205) | |
12 h | 2.036 (0.818) | 5.356 (0.747) | 2.832 (0.597) | 2.462 (1.353) | |
ET-1 (pg/mL) | 3 h | 15.293 (4.231) | 24.745 (1.011) | 19.635 (6.065) | 16.827 (3.775) |
6 h | 16.275 (3.180) | 25.625 (7.973) | 16.226 (3.174) | 14.855 (5.747) | |
12 h | 14.173 (2.556) | 24.725 (3.759) | 18.625 (5.780) | 15.185 (1.761) |
Table 2 Comparison of serum CREA content (mean ± SD, μmol/L)
Groups | 3 h | 6 h | 12 h |
Sham operation group | 17.867 ± 2.890 | 21.467 ± 3.044 | 19.733 ± 3.150 |
Model group | 38.400 ± 11.344 | 45.154 ± 17.435 | 41.500 ± 12.122 |
Baicalin-treated group | 37.615 ± 9.483 | 39.867 ± 13.648 | 50.733 ± 29.310 |
Octreotide-treated group | 29.200 ± 5.710 | 33.533 ± 10.106 | 33.933 ± 9.145 |
Table 3 Pathological score standard of kidney
Grade | Observation indexes |
I | No cellular proliferation or fibrosis in renal glomerulus; no capillary congestion or microthrombus; swelling and blurry boundary of renal tubular epithelial cell; stegnosis or atresia of lumens; protein cast and renal interstitial edema |
II | Glomerular capillary congestion, scattered necrosis in renal tubular epithelial cell, interstitial edema and inflammatory cell infiltration |
III | II + lamellar necrosis of renal tubular epithelial cell |
Table 4 Comparision of pathological score of kidney in all groups [M (QR)]
Groups | 3 h | 6 h | 12 h |
Sham operation group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Model group | 2.00 (1.00) | 2.00 (1.00) | 2.00 (1.25) |
Baicalin treated group | 1.00 (1.00) | 1.00 (1.00) | 2.00 (1.00) |
Octreotide-treated group | 1.00 (1.00) | 1.00 (1.00) | 1.00 (1.00) |
Table 5 Expression of Bax protein in kidney
Groups | n | Pathologic grade | ||||
- | + | ++ | +++ | |||
Sham operation group | (3 h) | 15 | 15 | |||
(6 h) | 15 | 15 | ||||
(12 h) | 15 | 15 | ||||
Model group | (3 h) | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | |
(6 h) | 13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | ||
(12 h) | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Baicalin treated group | (3 h) | 15 | 11 | 3 | 1 | |
(6 h) | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | ||
(12 h) | 15 | 12 | 3 | |||
Octreotide treated group | (3 h) | 15 | 12 | 3 | ||
(6 h) | 15 | 11 | 2 | 2 | ||
(12 h) | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 |
Table 6 Comparision of Bax protein in kidney [M (QR)] grade score
Groups | 3 h | 6 h | 12 h |
Sham operation group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Model group | 1.00 (2.00) | 0.00 (0.50) | 0.00 (1.25) |
Baicalin-treated group | 0.00 (0.50) | 0.00 (1.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Octreotide-treated group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (1.00) | 0.00 (1.00) |
Table 7 Expression of Bcl-2 protein in kidney
Groups | n | Pathologic grade | ||||
- | + | ++ | +++ | |||
Sham operation group | (3 h) | 15 | 15 | |||
(6 h) | 15 | 15 | ||||
(12 h) | 15 | 15 | ||||
Model group | (3 h) | 15 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
(6 h) | 13 | 4 | 1 | 8 | ||
(12 h) | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | ||
Baicalin-treated group | (3 h) | 15 | 14 | 1 | ||
(6 h) | 15 | 15 | ||||
(12 h) | 15 | 11 | 4 | |||
Octreotide-treated group | (3 h) | 15 | 13 | 2 | ||
(6 h) | 15 | 15 | ||||
(12 h) | 15 | 15 |
Table 8 Comparison of Bcl-2 protein in kidney [M (QR)] grade score
Groups | 3 h | 6 h | 12 h |
Sham operation group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Model group | 0.00 (2.00) | 3.00 (3.00) | 0.00 (1.25) |
Baicalin-treated group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (1.00) |
Octreotide-treated group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Table 9 Apoptotic index of kidney [M (QR)] (%)
Groups | 3 h | 6 h | 12 h |
Sham operation group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Model group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Baicalin-treated group | 0.00 (0.01) | 0.00 (0.02) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Octreotide-treated group | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.04) | 0.00 (0.00) |
Table 10 Comparison of serum PLA2 content (mean ± SD, U/mL)
Groups | 3 h | 6 h | 12 h |
Sham operation group | 14.62 ± 3.02 | 17.49 ± 3.82 | 19.02 ± 5.07 |
Model group | 76.10 ± 16.70 | 101.46 ± 14.67 | 105.33 ± 18.10 |
Baicalin-treated group | 56.25 ± 22.43 | 67.91 ± 20.61 | 66.86 ± 22.10 |
Octreotide-treated group | 74.37 ± 19.94 | 63.13 ± 26.31 | 53.63 ± 12.28 |
- Citation: Zhang XP, Tian H, Lai YH, Chen L, Zhang L, Cheng QH, Yan W, Li Y, Li QY, He Q, Wang F. Protective effects and mechanisms of Baicalin and octreotide on renal injury of rats with severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(38): 5079-5089
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i38/5079.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5079