Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2007; 13(22): 3101-3105
Published online Jun 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i22.3101
Table 1 Patients treated with anal plugs or RCI and response to questionaire n (%)
Anal plugsRCITotal
nResponsenResponsenResponse
Adults148 (57)7940 (51)9346 (49)
Children (< 18 yr)167 (44)9248 (52)10855 (51)
Total3015 (50)17188 (51)201101 (50)
Table 2 Demographics and actual use of retrograde colonic irrigation in adult patients n (%)
Fecal incontinenceConstipationP
Total2812
Age (yr)4246
Female /male23/59/3
Urological problems15 (54)6 (50)
Gynaecological problems3 (11)3 (25)
Neurological disease11 (39)3 (25)
- Spinal bifida42
- Multiple sclerosis21
- Spinal injury30
Anal atresia20
Impact complaints social life16 (64)8 (67)
Actual using RCI20 (71)5 (42)0.09
Therapy satisfaction all patients23 (82)6 (50)0.056
Therapy satisfaction among actual users19 (95)3 (60)0.7
Table 3 Demographics and use of retrograde colonic irrigation in children n (%)
Fecal incontinenceConstipation
Total2622
Age (yr)1113
Female /male14/1212/10
Urological problems22 (85)17 (77)
Any surgery25 (96)19 (86)
Neurological disease11 (96)3 (25)
- Spina bifida1910
- Hirsschprungs disease13
- Anorectal malformation43
- Idiopathic constipation05
- Miscellaneous disorders21
Impact complaints social life15 (58)14 (64)
Actual using RCI23 (88)20 (91)
Therapy satisfaction all patients24 (92)21 (88)
Therapy satisfaction among actual users23 (100)20 (100)