Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2007; 13(20): 2819-2825
Published online May 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i20.2819
Published online May 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i20.2819
Table 1 Liver biochemical profile in 40 Patients with biliary complications post OLT depending on time of presentation [Median, (range); mean ± SD]
Liver biochemicalparameters | Post OLT / before any biliarycomplication | On the day of presentation | Ist Follow-up (avg-1 mo) afterendoscopic therapy | IInd Follow-up (avg-3 mo) afterendoscopic therapy |
Bilirubin, mg/dL (< 1.3) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 1 |
(0.5-13.7) | (0.4-35.0) | (0.3-29.0) | (0.4-26.2) | |
2.8 ± 0.6 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | |
< 30 d | 3.3 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
1-3 mo | 1.1 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
4-12 mo | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
> 12 mo | 0.8 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
AST, U/L (< 32) | 22.5 | 48.5 | 20.5 | 29.5 |
(6.0-378.0) | (8.0-313.0) | (4.0-179.0) | (12.0-142.0) | |
54.4 ± 14.1 | 75.4 ± 12.2 | 38.8 ± 6.5 | 42.3 ± 5.7 | |
< 30 d | 37 | 64 | 18 | 25 |
1-3 mo | 19 | 40 | 18 | 20 |
4-12 mo | 20 | 46 | 20 | 25 |
> 12 mo | 17 | 40 | 34 | 38 |
ALT, U/L (< 31) | 26.5 | 90.5 | 30 | 24 |
(4.0-126.0) | (4.0-891.0) | (4.0-216.0) | (5.0-142.0) | |
98.8 ± 22.0 | 145.7 ± 33.1 | 46.1 ± 8.0 | 37.2 ± 5.7 | |
< 30 d | 125 | 102 | 23 | 25 |
1-3 mo | 97 | 89 | 32 | 23 |
4-12 mo | 26 | 97 | 24 | 24 |
> 12 mo | 19 | 58 | 37 | 30 |
GGT, U/L (< 38) | 74.5 | 236 | 123 | 117 |
(14.0-182.0) | (19.0-1748.0) | (9.0-1697.0) | (9.0-1294.0) | |
168.5 ± 34.2 | 388.1 ± 70.9 | 282.2 + 63.9 | 233.4 ± 60.4 | |
< 30 d | 152 | 296 | 123 | 54 |
1-3 mo | 82 | 157 | 96 | 38 |
4-12 mo | 45 | 367 | 103 | 63 |
> 12 mo | 39 | 182 | 235 | 266 |
Alkaline phosphatase, U/L (< 104) | 107 | 242 | 141 | 127.5 |
(24.0-671.0) | (32.0-1799.0) | (47.0-1435.0) | (46.0-1267.0) | |
152.7 ± 21.4 | 345.1 ± 59.1 | 270.7 ± 51.3 | 287.3 ± 53.8 | |
< 30 d | 107 | 240 | 144 | 120 |
1-3 mo | 130 | 100 | 138 | 117 |
4-12 mo | 75 | 244 | 125 | 110 |
> 12 mo | 107 | 263 | 286 | 423 |
Table 2 Type and number of complications in patients post OLT (n = 40)
No. of complications | No. of patients | Type of complication |
1 | 20 | 10 biliary leakage (50%), 7 anastomotic strictures(35%), 1 vanishing bile duct syndrome,ITBL, and abscess (5%) each |
2 | 14 | 5 anastomotic strictures and biliary leakage (36%), 5 anastomotic strictures and ITBL (36%), 4 other combinations (28%) |
> 2 | 6 | 2 anastomotic strictures and stones and secondary chonlangitis (33%), 4 other combinations (66%) |
Table 3 Spectrum of biliary tract complications (n = 70) and their treatment post OLT
Classification | No. ofcomplications n (%) | Type of treatment |
Isolated bile leak | 17 (24.3) | Stent +/- Stent exchange PTBD (2 patients) Primary re-operation (3 patients) |
Isolated anastomoticstricture | 28 (40) | Stent +/- Stent exchange Multiple stenting Bougienage, Balloon dilatation PTBD (2 patients) Primary re-operation (1 patients) |
Ischemic type biliarylesion (ITBL) | 6 (8.6) | Stent +/- Stent exchange Bougienage, Balloon dilatation |
Miscellaneous | 19 (27.1) | Stent +/- Stent exchange |
Stones | 7 (10) | Multiple stenting |
Vanishing bile duct | 2 (2.8) | Bougienage, Balloon dilatation |
Syndrome | Stone extraction | |
Ductopenic rejection | 1 (1.4) | |
Absecss | 5 (7.1) | |
Secondary cholangitis | 2 (2.8) | |
Ampullary dyskinesia (SOD) | 2 (2.8) |
Table 4 Type of complications related to time post OLT
Time elapsedbetween OLD &complication | No. ofcomplication | Type of complication (%) | |||
IBL | IAS | ITBL | Misc. | ||
≤ 30 d | 20 | 11 (55.0) | 7 (35.0) | 1 (5.0) | 1 (5.0) |
1-3 mo | 13 | 5 (38.5) | 4 (30.1) | 1 (7.7) | 3 (23.0) |
4-12 mo | 22 | 1 (4.5) | 11 (50.0) | 2 (9.0) | 8 (36.4) |
> 12 mo | 15 | - | 6 (40.0) | 2 (13.3) | 7 (46.7) |
Total | 70 | 17 (24.3) | 28 (40.0) | 6 (8.6) | 19 (27.1) |
- Citation: Shastri YM, Hoepffner NM, Akoglu B, Zapletal C, Bechstein WO, Caspary WF, Faust D. Liver biochemistry profile, significance and endoscopic management of biliary tract complications post orthotopic liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(20): 2819-2825
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i20/2819.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i20.2819