Basic Research
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2007; 13(11): 1680-1686
Published online Mar 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i11.1680
Table 1 Correlation between expression of HIF-1α mRNA, VEGF and MVD and pathologic parameters in 118 patients with gastric carcinoma
Clinicopathologic indexnHIF-1αmRNA
χ2VEGF
χ2MVDt
-++++++-++++++(/0.72 mm2)
Type of tumor14.523.75
papillary adenocarcinomas19123221302434.35 ± 17.47
Tubular adenocarcinomas3920251219012840.20 ± 14.84
Poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas3716171316210940.24 ± 15.47
Signet-ring cell carcinomas115006222548.63 ± 12.28
Mucinous adenocarcinomas127023222648.98 ± 10.41
Degree of differentiation4.482.651.26
Well or moderately70395917342161840.12 ± 15.52
differentiated adenocarcinomas
Poorly differentiated and48211719184121443.70 ± 14.93
undifferentiated adenocarcinomas
Depth of invasion24.2230.056.23
T1-T247363173524631.98 ± 14.37
T3-T4712431529174242647.93 ± 12.41
Vessel invasion22.0343.069.04
No29243022800125.69 ± 10.11
Yes89363  1634246283146.75 ± 13.01
Lymph node metastasis18.9935.528.77
No35273053011327.07 ± 11.33
Yes83333  1631225272947.69 ± 12.41
Distant metastasis72.0661.7112.91
No63526  234845630.81 ± 12.43
Yes5580  143342232653.91 ± 6.42
Table 2 Relationship between HIF-1α mRNA, VEGF and MVD value and prognosis of gastric carcinoma
GroupsnMean survival time (mo)5-yr survival (%)
HIF-1α mRNA
-60127 ± 10.2582.72
+5837 ± 12.6525.67
VEGF
-52117 ± 11.3275.35
+6645 ± 10.8221.22
MVD (/0.72 mm2)
< 41.576130 ± 10.7283.75
≥ 41.54243 ± 11.7820.42