Jun DW, Lee OY, Lim HC, Kwon SJ, Lee HL, Yoon BC, Choi HS, Hahm JS, Lee MH, Lee DH. Role of computed tomographic colonoscopy of postoperative surveillance in patient with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(11): 1646-1651 [PMID: 17461465 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i11.1646]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Oh Young Lee, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 17, Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-792, Korea. leeoy@hanyang.ac.kr
Article-Type of This Article
Gastric Cancer
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2007; 13(11): 1646-1651 Published online Mar 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i11.1646
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the subjects
Characteristics
Colon polyp survey groupn = 188 (%)
CT colonoscopy groupn = 47 (%)
Male
117 (62.2)
29 (61.7)
Female
71 (37.8)
18 (38.3)
Age (yr)
Mean
60.1
53.8
Range
38-80
29-80
TMN Stage
Ia
82 (43.6)
23 (48.9)
Ib
41 (21.8)
9 (19.1)
II
29 (15.4)
5 (10.6)
IIIa
16 (8.5)
5 (10.6)
IIIb
11 (5.9)
4 (8.5)
IV
9 (4.8)
1 (2.1)
Operation
Mucosectomy
1 (0.5)
0 (0.0)
Subtotal gastrectomy
152 (80.9)
34 (72.3)
Total gastrectomy
35 (18.6)
13 (27.7)
Interval from operation
Mean (mo)
40.8
23.2
Table 2 Colon polyp number and prevalence in colon polyp survey group and CT colonoscopy group
Characteristics
Colon polyp survey groupn = 188 (%)
CT colonoscopy groupn = 47 (%)
Number of total colon polyps
109
20
1
35
10
2
13
5
3
5
0
4
2
0
5
3
0
> 5
1
0
Prevalence of colon polyp
59 (31.4%)
15/47 (31.9%)
Success rate of cecal intubation
91.50%
83.70%
Table 3 Characteristics of colorectal lesions confirmed by colonoscopy in CT colonoscopy group
Total (n = 20)
Adenoma
Hyperplasia
Size
1-5 mm
15
11
4
6-9 mm
2
1
1
≥ 10 mm
3
3
0
Location
Rectum
6 (30%)
5
1
Sigmoid colon
7 (35%)
6
1
Descending colon
1 (5%)
1
0
Transverse colon and splenic flexure
3 (15%)
3
0
Ascending colon and hepatic flexure
2 (10%)
0
2
Cecum
1 (5%)
0
1
Table 4 Ability of virtual colonosocpy to identify patients with colorectal polyps or masses according to lesion in CT colonoscopy group
TP (n)
TN (n)
FP (n)
FN (n)
Sensitivity
Specificity
PPV
NPV
≥ 1 mm
8
24
9
6
57.10%
72.70%
47.10%
80.00%
≥ 6 mm
4
39
3
1
80.00%
92.90%
57.10%
97.50%
Table 5 Results of virtual colonoscopy comparing with colonos-copy according to polyp size in CT colonoscopy group
Size
No. of polyp
True positive
False negative
Sensitivity (%)
≥ 10 mm
2
2
0
100
6-9 mm
5
4
1
80
1-5 mm
18
6
7
46.2
All
25
12
8
60
Table 6 Frequency of age, stage, and histology type according to colon polyp.
Polyp
P
Yes n (%)
No n (%)
Age
< 39
0 (0.0)
1 (100.0)
0.006
40-49
3 (14.3)
18 (85.7)
50–59
17 (25.8)
49 (74.2)
60–69
26 (36.6)
45 (63.4)
> 70
13 (44.8)
16 (55.2)
Histology
Papillary
1 (50.0)
1 (50.0)
0.073
Tubular; Well differentiation
4 (25.0)
12 (75.0)
Moderate differentiation
26 (42.6)
35 (57.4)
Poorly differentiation
14 (29.2)
34 (70.8)
Signet ring
10 (19.2)
42 (80.8)
Mucinous
1 (16.7)
5 (83.3)
Mixed
1 (50.0)
1(50.0)
Miscellaneous
0 (0.0)
1 (100.0)
Stage
I
35 (28.5)
88 (71.5)
0.546
II
18 (62.1)
11 (37.9)
III
15 (55.6)
12 (44.4)
IV
8 (88.9)
1 (11.1)
Citation: Jun DW, Lee OY, Lim HC, Kwon SJ, Lee HL, Yoon BC, Choi HS, Hahm JS, Lee MH, Lee DH. Role of computed tomographic colonoscopy of postoperative surveillance in patient with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(11): 1646-1651