Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2006; 12(9): 1408-1411
Published online Mar 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i9.1408
Table 2 Comparison of clinical pathological factors and CEA mRNA expression
Positive CEA mRNA1(%)P-value
Gender:
Male48 (24/50)
Female47 (7/15)1.000
Depth of invasion:
pT361 (22/36)0.024
pT1+pT231 (9/29)
Cancer location
Cardia53 (10/19)0.618
Gastric body40 (10/25)
Gastric antrum52 (11/21)
Lymph node metastasis
yes47(21/45)1.000
no50(10/20)
TNM stages
I+ II33(10/30)
III+ IV60(21/35)0.046
Table 3 Comparison of CEA mRNA in gastric cancer patients with or without peritoneal metastasis (mean ± SD)
Peritoneal metastasisCEA mRNAP-value
Yes16006.2 ± 18242.P < 0.001
No40.5 ± 158.9