Gastric Cancer
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2006; 12(8): 1182-1186
Published online Feb 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1182
Table 1 Clinical features of patients with node-negative and -positive gastric carcinoma
VariablesNode-negative(n = 1524) (%)Node-positive(n = 1324) (%)P value
Age (mean, yr)56.9 ± 11.157.1 ± 11.6NS
GenderNS
Male988 (64.8)889 (67.1)
Female536 (35.2)435 (32.9)
Extent of lymph node dissectionNS
<D2262 (17.2)246 (18.6)
≥D21,262 (82.8)1,078 (81.4)
Operative type< 0.001
Total gastrectomy251 (16.5)383 (28.9)
Subtotal gastrectomy1,226 (80.4)902 (68.1)
Proximal gastrectomy12 (0.8)3 (0.3)
Others35 (2.3)36 (2.7)
Curability< 0.001
Curative1,492 (97.9)1,024 (77.3)
Non-curative32 (2.1)300 (22.7)
Recurrence< 0.001
Locoregional29 (13.2)46 (8.5)
Peritoneum163 (74.1)480 (88.4)
Others28 (12.7)17 (3.1 )
Table 2 Histopathologic features of node-negative and -positive gastric carcinoma
VariablesNode-negative(n = 1524) (%)Node-positive(n = 1324) (%)P value
Tumor size (mean, cm)2.9 ± 2.05.0 ± 2.7< 0.001
LocationNS
Upper123 (8.1)141 (10.7)
Middle443 (29.0)358 (27.0)
Lower946 (62.1)783 (59.1)
Whole12 (0.8)42 (3.2)
Macroscopic appearanceNS
EGC
Elevated161 (20.0)27 (24.1)
Depressed572 (71.2)69 (61.6)
Flat71 (8.8)16 (14.3)
Borrmann type< 0.001
147 (6.5)54 (4.5)
2183 (25.4)218 (18.0)
3441 (61.3)812 (67.0)
449 (6.8)128 (10.5)
Depth of invasion< 0.001
T1804 (52.8)112 (8.5)
T2343 (22.5)170 (12.8)
T3338 (22.1)856 (64.7)
T439 (2.6)186 (14.0)
Hepatic metastasis< 0.001
H (-)1,519 (99.7)1,269 (95.8)
H (+)5 (0.3)55 (4.2)
Peritoneal dissemination< 0.001
P (-)1,509 (99.0)1,179 (89.0)
P (+)15 (1.0)145 (11.0)
Histologic type<0.001
Well-differentiated355 (23.3)165 (12.5)
Moderately differentiated352 (23.1)339 (25.6)
Poorly differentiated536 (35.1)642 (48.5)
Signet ring cell189 (12.4)59 (4.5)
Mucinous53 (3.5)95 (7.1)
Others39 (2.6)24 (1.8)
Stage<0.001
I1,145 (75.1)91 (6.9)
II324 (21.3)124 (9.4)
III30 (2.0)689 (52.0)
IV25 (1.6)420 (31.7)
Table 3 Prognostic significance by univariate analysis of variables for patients with lymph node-negative gastric carcinoma
Variables5-year survival (%)P value
Age (yr)< 0.01
< 6579.1
≥ 6570.7
GenderNS
Male74.4
Female81.3
Tumor size (cm)< 0.001
< 2.088.5
2 - 4.979.2
≥ 553.6
Depth of invasion< 0.001
T1, T288.4
T3, T455.4
Location< 0.001
Upper third49.9
Middle third67.9
Lower third62.3
Histologic typeNS
Differentiated78.4
Undifferentiated75.7
Operative type< 0.001 NS
Total61.5
Subtotal80.9
Extent of lymph node dissection
< D267.6
≥ D277.3
Stage< 0.001
I88.4
II61.5
III17.9
IV22.3
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of significant prognostic factors for survival in lymph node negative gastric carcinoma patients using Cox proportional hazard regression model
VariablesRisk ratio95% CIP value
Age(yr) (< 65 vs ≥65)1.3540.95-1.92NS
Gender (male vs female)0.9230.66-1.28NS
Location (upper vs distal)0.7310.49-1.09NS
Tumor size (mm) (< 50 vs ≥50)1.5131.06-2.21< 0.05
Histologic type (differentiated vs. undifferentiated)0.7490.55-1.02NS
Serosal invasion (negative vs positive)3.4092.42-4.80< 0.001
Extent of lymph node dissection (< D2 vs ≥ D2)1.1880.56-2.50NS
Curability (curative vs non-curative)3.842.11-7.00< 0.001
Esophageal invasion (negative vs positive)1.0070.34-2.97NS