Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2006; 12(25): 4082-4085
Published online Jul 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4082
Table 1 Comparison of operative incision of 3 groups
GroupnType I incision
Type II incision
Type III incision
n (%)n (%)n (%)
EK936 (6.45)83 (89.23)4 (4.30)
EC553 (5.45)50 (90.91)2 (3.64)
Control725 (6.94)63 (87.50)4 (5.56)
Table 2 Infection of incisional sites for the experimental animals
GroupnEG’s incision healing
InfectionnCG’s incision healing
Infection
ABCrate (%)ABCrate (%)
10030232523.333028026.60
10227173737.0430261313.33
105301551050.0029223424.14
108301141563.3330192936.67
Table 3 Pathological examination results of experimental animals
GroupnEG
InfectionnCG
Infection
IIIIIIIVrate (%)IIIIIIIVrate (%)
100301449323.3330167436.60
102275510737.04301355713.33
105306761180.00291336755.17
108305581283.33301335956.67