Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2006; 12(25): 4029-4032
Published online Jul 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4029
Table 1 Patient characteristics, polyp characteristics, and biopsy results
Age (Mean ± SD, yr)59.9 ± 10.8
Sex (Male : Female)25:49
Number of polyps
166 (89.2%)
25 (6.8%)
33 (4.0%)
Location of polyps
Antrum50 (58.8%)
Body
Low16 (18.8%)
Mid9 (10.6%)
High5 (5.9%)
Angle3 (3.5%)
Fundus2 (2.4%)
Diameter of polyps (cm)
< 136 (42.4%)
1-1.938 (44.7%)
2-311 (12.9%)
Yamada type
I33 (33.8%)
II24 (28.2%)
III12 (14.1%)
IV16 (18.9%)
Endoscopic biopsy results
Tubular adenoma41 (48.2%)
Hyperplastic polyp26 (30.6%)
Inflammatory polyp13 (15.3%)
Fundic gland polyp2 (2.4%)
Dysplasia2 (2.4%)
Tubulovillous adenoma1 (1.1%)
Table 2 Pathological results of resected specimen
Pathologyn (%)
Tubular adenoma39 (45.9)
Hyperplastic polyp27 (31.8)
Inflammatory polyp8 (9.4)
Hamartomatous polyp3 (3.5)
Fundic gland polyp2 (2.4)
Tubulovillous adenoma2 (2.4)
Adenocarcinoma2 (2.4)
Dysplasia1 (1.1)
Mucosal pseudolipomatosis1 (1.1)
Total85 (100)
Table 3 Histological comparison between results of endoscopic biopsy and resected specimen
Endoscopic biopsyResected specimen
Tubular adenomaHyperplastic polypInflammatory polypHamartomaFundic gland polypTubulovillous adenomaAdenocarcinomaDysplasiaMP1Total
Tubular adenoma35 (85.4%)02 (4.9%)001 (2.4%)2 (4.9%)1 (2.4%)041
Hyperplastic polyp1 (3.8%)22 (84.8%)1 (3.8%)1 (3.8%)00001 (3.8%)26
Inflammatory polyp2 (15.4%)5 (38.5%)4 (30.7%)02 (15.4%)000013
Fundic gland polyp0002 (100%)000002
Dysplasia1 (50%)01 (50%)0000002
Tubulovillous adenoma000001 (100%)0001
Total3927832221185