Lee JH, Kim JJ, Hahm KB, Lee DH, Kim N, Kim SK, Park JJ, Choi SR, Lee JH, Lee ST, Lee EH, Rhee JC. Efficacy and safety of ecabet sodium on functional dyspepsia: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, multi-center controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(17): 2756-2761 [PMID: 16718764 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2756]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jong Chul Rhee, MD, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, #50 Irwon-Dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea. leejh@smc.samsung.co.kr
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Research
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2006; 12(17): 2756-2761 Published online May 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2756
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the enrolled patients
Group
Ecabet group
Cimetidine group
P
(n= 133)
(n= 139)
Gender (male:female)
47:86
47:92
NS
Age (yr)
45.0 ± 12.9
47.5 ± 12.5
NS
Weight (kg)
59.6 ± 10.0
58.5 ± 9.0
NS
Height (cm)
162.7 ± 8.0
161.8 ± 7.7
NS
Smoking (%)
23 (17.3)
16 (11.5)
NS
Alcohol intake (%)
47 (35.3)
38 (27.3)
NS
Table 2 Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection
Group
Positive (%)
Negative (%)
Undetermined (%)
Ecabet group
44
45
31
(n = 120)
(36.7)
(37.5)
(25.9)
Cimetidine group
40
60
28
(n = 128)
(31.3)
(46.9)
(21.9)
Table 3 Global assessment of symptomatic improvement after 4 wk of medication
Group
Ecabet group
Cimetidine group
(n= 115) (%)
(n = 121) (%)
Improved
89 (77.4)
96 (79.3)
Not improved
26 (22.6)
25 (20.7)
Table 4 Comparison of quality of life scores before and after treatment (mean±SD)
Status
Before treatment
After treatment
Ecabet group(n= 115)
Cimetidine group(n= 121)
P
Ecabet group(n = 115)
Cimetidine group(n = 121)
P
Eating status
15.0 ± 4.6
14.8 ± 4.1
NS
15.6 ± 4.0
15.9 ± 3.5
NS
Liveliness status
10.4 ± 4.1
10.0 ± 4.0
NS
11.6 ± 3.6
11.3 ± 3.5
NS
Psychological status
18.5 ± 5.0
18.6 ± 4.5
NS
20.3 ± 4.4
20.4 ± 4.1
NS
Role-functioning status
20.5 ± 4.2
20.6 ± 4.2
NS
21.4 ± 3.9
21.0 ± 4.3
NS
Table 5 Comparison of global symptomatic improvement by H pylori status
H pylori infection
Gastrex group
Cimetidine group
Improved (%)
Not improved(%)
Improved (%)
Not improved (%)
Negative
28 (84.85)
5 (15.15)
27 (84.38)
5 (15.63)
Positive
28 (75.68)
9 (24.32)
24 (72.73)
9 (27.27)
Table 6 Comparison of global symptomatic improvement by age
Age
Gastrex group
Cimetidine group
Improveed (%)
Not improved (%)
Improved (%)
Not improved (%)
Less than fifty
55 (61.8)
14 (53.85)
61 (63.54)
12 (48.0)
fifty and over
34 (38.2)
12 (46.15)
35 (36.46)
13 (52.0)
Table 7 Comparison of global symptomatic improvement by sex
Sex
Gastrex group
Cimetidine group
Improved (%)
Not improved (%)
Improved (%)
Not improved (%)
Men
27 (71.05)
11 (28.94)
34 (79.07)
9 (20.93)
Women
63 (80.76)
15 (19.23)
62 (79.48)
16 (20.51)
Citation: Lee JH, Kim JJ, Hahm KB, Lee DH, Kim N, Kim SK, Park JJ, Choi SR, Lee JH, Lee ST, Lee EH, Rhee JC. Efficacy and safety of ecabet sodium on functional dyspepsia: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, multi-center controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(17): 2756-2761