Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2006; 12(16): 2549-2555
Published online Apr 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i16.2549
Published online Apr 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i16.2549
VEGF-C expression | ||||
Positive (n = 16) | Negative (n = 18) | P Value | ||
Age | 64.7 ± 11.6 | 64.1 ± 10.8 | 0.870 | |
Gender ( M / F ) | 10 / 6 | 11 / 17 | 0.999 | |
pT classification1 | pT1 | 1 | 4 | 0.56 |
pT2 | 8 | 11 | ||
pT3 | 7 | 3 | ||
Histopathological Grading1 | G1 | 10 | 15 | 0.225 |
G2 | 6 | 2 | ||
G3 | 0 | 1 | ||
Lymphatic vessel invasion | (presence) | 14 (87.5 %) | 13 (72.2 %) | 0.405 |
Venous invasion | (presence) | 10 (62.5 %) | 4 (22.2 %) | 0.035 |
Perineural invasion | (presence) | 14 (87.5 %) | 10 (55.6 %) | 0.063 |
Lymph nodes metastasis | Metastasis (-) | 6 | 13 | 0.042 |
Metastasis (+) | 10 | 5 | ||
(including micrometastasis) |
Variable | 5-yr survival (%) | P Value | |
Age | < 60 vs≥ 60 | 40.0 vs 44.9 | 0.912 |
Gender | male vs female | 42.3 vs 45.5 | 0.872 |
Operative procedure | hepatectomy vs bile duct resection | 42.2 vs 60.0 | 0.430 |
Histopathologic Grading1 | G2, G3 vs G1 | 37.5 vs 46.0 | 0.393 |
Lymphatic vessel invasion | present vs absent | 37.4 vs 75.0 | 0.076 |
Venous invasion | present vs absent | 36.4 vs 49.7 | 0.185 |
Perineural invasion | present vs absent | 36.3 vs 68.6 | 0.064 |
Microscopic resection margin2 | em1 vs em0 | 31.7 vs 83.3 | 0.040 |
VEGF-C expression | positive vs negative | 23.3 vs 70.5 | 0.036 |
Lymph node metastasis (Including micrometastasis) | positive vs negative | 8.5 vs 72.5 | 0.0004 |
Lymph node metastasis (except micrometastasis) | positive vs negative | 0.0 vs 60.2 | 0.0017 |
- Citation: Taniguchi K, Iida T, Hori T, Yagi S, Imai H, Shiraishi T, Uemoto S. Impact of lymph node micrometastasis in hilar bile duct carcinoma patients. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(16): 2549-2555
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i16/2549.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i16.2549