Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2006; 12(14): 2229-2234
Published online Apr 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i14.2229
Published online Apr 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i14.2229
Table 1 Diagnostic standards for pancreatic cancer
A. Confirmed diagnosis by pathology |
B. A valid confirmation requires at least 2 of the following listed items of imaging tests |
(1) Ultrasound indicates there are low-density area in pancreas, as well as pancreatic duct dilation and common bile duct and gall bladder swelling |
(2) CT indicates local enlargement and mass occupying lesion in pancreas |
(3) ERCP indicates discontinuity of pancreatic duct, having mouse-tail ending, stiff and irregular duct wall, or any pull sign and double-duct sign |
(4) MREP indicates there are stenosis and dilation in pancreatic duct and/or bile duct and space-occupying lesion in pancreas |
(5) EUS indicates there is low-density, occupying lesion in pancreas |
(6) IDUS |
(7) Angiography |
(8) PET |
C. Palpable mass in surgery and at least an item of radiology evidence |
Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for patients and controls
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | |
Patients | (1) The patient voluntarily took part in this research; agreed to take necessary clinical examinations and answer epidemiological questionnaire survey; and give consent to the publication of research data. | (1) The patient did not agree upon the conditions to participate in the study or the patient information was not available at the inclusion time. |
(2) Diagnosed by the pancreatic cancer team from PUMCH. | (2) Not diagnosed by the pancreatic cancer team from PUMCH. | |
(3)Clinical examination and epidemiological investigation were acceptable for the patient’s condition. | (3) The patient’s condition did not allow the clinical examination and epidemiological investigation. | |
(4) Patient was diagnosed for pancreatic cancer between 2002 and 2004. | (4) The patient was not diagnosed for pancreatic cancer for the first time between 2002 and 2004. | |
(5) Patients did not undergo radiotherapy and anticancer therapy before surgery, and did not have other primary tumors. | (5) Patients whose pancreatic tumor was a metastatic carcinoma or who had other tumors. | |
(6) Patients belonged to Han nationality. | (6) Patients were not from Han nationality. | |
Controls | (1) The person voluntarily took part in this research; agreeed to take necessary clinical examinations and answer epidemiological questionnaire survey; and give consent to the publication of research data. | (1) The person did not agree upon the conditions to participate in the study or the person’s information was not available at the inclusion time. |
(2) The person did not have any kind of tumor. | (2) Person had any kind of malignant tumor. | |
(3) The person matched with the patients for gender and age (±5 years). | (3) Person suffered from severe coronary heart disease or stroke. | |
(4) Being the resident of Beijing or its peripheral area for at least 5 years. | (4) Person did not match with the patient group for gender and age (±5 years). | |
(5) Han nationality. | (5) Not from Han nationality. |
Table 3 Demographic characters of patients and controls
Patients | Controls | χ2 | P | |||
n (%) | n (%) | |||||
Age (yr) | ||||||
Male ≤ 50 | 16 | (20.8) | 36 | (31.9) | ||
50-59 | 17 | (22.1) | 27 | (23.9) | 3.6583 | 0.1606 |
≥ 60 | 44 | (57.1) | 50 | (44.3) | ||
Female ≤ 50 | 9 | (21.4 | 28 | (29.5) | ||
50-59 | 8 | (19.1) | 26 | (27.4) | 3.1297 | 0.2091 |
≥ 60 | 25 | (59.5) | 41 | (43.2) | ||
Gender Male | 77 | (64.7) | 113 | (54.3) | ||
Female | 42 | (35.3) | 95 | (45.7) | 3.3496 | 0.0672 |
Marriage status | ||||||
Married | 115 | (96.6) | 183 | (87.9) | ||
Divorced | 0 | (0) | 7 | (3.4) | ||
Widowed | 4 | (3.4) | 16 | (7.7) | 8.093 | 0.082 |
Separated | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.5) | ||
Spinsterhood | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.5) |
Table 4 Benign digestive diseases in patients and controls
Diseases | Patients | Controls | P | ||||||
n | Yes | No | Not stated | n | Yes | No | Not stated | ||
Chronic pancreatitis | 119 | 2.5 | 95.0 | 2.5 | 205 | 0.5 | 99.5 | 0 | 0.012 |
Acute pancreatitis | 119 | 0 | 98.3 | 1.7 | 205 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0.06 |
Cholelithiasis | 119 | 10.01 | 89.1 | 0.8 | 205 | 4.9 | 95.1 | 0 | 0.08 |
Cholecystitis | 118 | 9.3 | 87.3 | 3.4 | 205 | 0.5 | 99.5 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Cholecystectomy | 119 | 3.4 | 95.8 | 0.8 | 205 | 2.9 | 97.1 | 0 | 0.41 |
Table 5 Clinical symptoms of patients and controls
Symptom | Symptom duration (mo)a | Patients | Controls | P | ||||||
n | Yes | No | Not stated | n | Yes | No | Not stated | |||
Anorexia | 2 | 118 | 45.8 | 54.2 | 0 | 203 | 0.5 | 99.5 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Epigastric pain | 3 | 119 | 60.5 | 38.7 | 0.8 | 181 | 2.2 | 97.8 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Backache | 2 | 119 | 32.8 | 66.4 | 0.8 | 205 | 2.0 | 98.1 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Hypogastralgia | 3 | 119 | 16.0 | 82.4 | 1.7 | 205 | 3.4 | 96.6 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Abdominal pain | 2 | 119 | 38.7 | 61.3 | 0 | 205 | 4.9 | 95.1 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Jaundice | 1 | 119 | 42.0 | 58.0 | 0 | 205 | 0.5 | 99.5 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Skin itch | 1 | 119 | 13.5 | 86.6 | 0 | 205 | 8.7 | 91.3 | 0 | 0.0032 |
Weight loss | 3 | 119 | 76.5 | 22.7 | 0.8 | 205 | 2.4 | 97.6 | 0 | <0.0001 |
Table 6 Risk scoring model for pancreatic cancer
Risk factor | Criteria | Points |
Gender | Male | 2 |
Age (yr) | > 60 | 7 |
Alcohol drinking | > 20 drink-yr | 4 |
Smoking | > 17 pack-yr | 5 |
Diabetic mellitus history | 17 | |
High meat consumption | 7 | |
Family history of pancreatic cancer | 15 | |
Chronic pancreatitis | 12 | |
Cholelithiasis history | 8 | |
Cholecystitis history | 1 | |
Anorexia | 25 | |
Epigastric pain | 25 | |
Weight loss | 37 | |
Jaundice | 30 |
- Citation: Lu XH, Wang L, Li H, Qian JM, Deng RX, Zhou L. Establishment of risk model for pancreatic cancer in Chinese Han population. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(14): 2229-2234
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i14/2229.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i14.2229