Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2005; 11(43): 6843-6847
Published online Nov 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6843
Table 1 Comparison of histological lesions in treated and untreated groups of animals (mean±SD)
GroupActive ulcers and erosionsP valueReparative lesionsP value
1 (Infliximab 5, n = 6)0.07±0.120.300.38±0.120.0001
2 (Infliximab 10, n = 6)3.77±5.070.420.80±0.140.0001
3 (Infliximab 15, n = 6)25.02±38.901.001.00±0.470.0001
4 (Untreated, n = 12)25.00±38.9115.00±5.48
Table 2 Percentage of bowel area without active inflammation in treated and untreated groups of animals (mean±SD)
GroupPercentage of mucosa without active inflammationP value
1 (Infliximab 5)99.55±0.190.049
2 (Infliximab 10)95.43±5.150.088
3 (Infliximab 15)73.98±39.290.705
4 (Untreated)60.00±37.18
Table 3 Tissue TNF-α levels in treated and untreated groups of animals (mean±SD)
GroupTissue TNF-α (pg/mL)P value
1 (Infliximab 5)0.47±0.44<0.0001
2 (Infliximab 10)1.09±0.86<0.0001
3 (Infliximab 15)0.43±0.31<0.0001
4 (Untreated)18.73±10.53
5 (Healthy animals)0.00+/–0.0
Table 4 Mean value of tissue malondialdehyde in treated and untreated groups of animals (mean±SD)
GroupSerum malondialdehyde (μmol/l)P value
1 (Infliximab 5)1.85±0.200.017
2 (Infliximab 10)1.84±0.370.011
3 (Infliximab 15)2.29±0.560.272
4 (Untreated)2.73±0.46
5 (Healthy animals)1.11+/–0.19