Clinical Research
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2005; 11(43): 6823-6827
Published online Nov 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6823
Table 1 Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients
CharacteristicsTreatment regimen
CefotaximeAmikacinP
Number of patients1918
Male/female2月17日11月7日NS
Age(yr)154 ± 1758 ± 11NS
Etiologies of cirrhosis (%)2NS
Alcoholism3 (16)2 (11)
Chronic hepatitis B14 (74)11 (61)
Chronic hepatitis C1 (5)4 (22)
Child-Pugh score111.4 ± 1.211.1 ± 1.1NS
Serum creatinine(mg/dL)11.5 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.4NS
Table 2 Flora of ascites and blood
Treatment regimen
Cefotaxime (%)Amikacin (%)P
Ascites
Escherichia coli4 (21)3 (17)NS
Klebsiella pneumoniae01 (6)NS
Citrobacter diversus01 (6)NS
Blood
Escherichia coli2 (11)1 (6)NS
Klebsiella pneumoniae1 (5)2 (11)NS
Streptococcus group B1 (5)0NS
Vibrio amalonaticus1 (5)0NS
Table 3 Results of treatment
Treatment regimen
Cefotaxime (%)Amikacin (%)P
Number of patients1918
Cure215 (78.9)11 (61.1)NS
Normalized PMN count218 (94.7)15 (83.3)NS
Serum creatinine(mg/dL)11.3 ± 0.81.5 ± 1.1NS
Afebril in 72 h218 (94.7)15 (83.3)NS
Pain-free in 72 h219 (100)17 (94.4)NS
Recurrence23(15.8)0NS
Superinfection200NS
Infection-related mortality203 (16.7)0.105
Hospitalization mortality24 (21.1)5 (27.8)NS
Days of hospitalization112 ± 813 ± 9NS
Table 4 Evaluation of nephrotoxicity
Treatment regimen
Cefotaxime(%)Amikacin(%)P
Number of patients1918
Renal impairment (%)22 (10.5)2 (11.1)NS
Urinary β2-microglobulin (mg/L)
Before treatment1402 ± 801220 ± 392NS
3 d after initiation1779 ± 2465612 ± 814NS
2 d after withdrawal1126 ± 119173 ± 44NS
increase > 2 000 mg/L (%)21 (5.3)1 (5.6)NS
Table 5 Amikacin concentration (mean ± SD)
Blood peak level (μg/mL)19.6 – 127.3 (40 ± 32)
Blood trough level (μg/mL)1.3 – 73.7 (12 ± 22)
Ascites peak level (μg/mL)4.3 – 80.1 (20 ± 25)
Ascites trough level(μg/mL)1.2 – 78.9 (15 ± 26)