Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2005; 11(43): 6800-6806
Published online Nov 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6800
Published online Nov 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6800
Table 1 Classical risk factors of cholecystolithiasis in multiple logistic regression
Classical risk factors | Odds ratio (OR) | 95%CI | P |
Age (per yr) | 1.06 | 1.05–1.08 | <0.001 |
Female sex | 2.78 | 1.91–4.07 | <0.001 |
BMI (per kg/m2) | 1.12 | 1.08–1.15 | <0.001 |
Positive family history | 1.89 | 1.30–2.75 | <0.001 |
Table 2 History of pregnancy and the number of prior pregnancies in the multiple logistic regression model (only females)
Factor tested | Odds ratio (OR) | 95%CI | P |
Age (per yr) | 1.06 | 1.04–1.08 | <0.001 |
BMI (per kg/m2) | 1.11 | 1.07–1.15 | <0.001 |
Positive family history | 1.99 | 1.28–3.07 | 0.002 |
Positive history of pregnancy | 0.76 | 0.44–1.31 | 0.321 |
Table 3 Number of pregnancies in the multiple logistic regression model (only females)
Factor tested | Odds ratio (OR) | 95%CI | P |
Age (per yr) | 1.06 | 1.04–1.08 | <0.001 |
BMI (per kg/m2) | 1.11 | 1.07–1.15 | <0.001 |
Positive family history | 2.09 | 1.34–3.25 | <0.001 |
Number of pregnancies | 0.104 | ||
One or two vs none | 0.65 | 0.37–1.15 | |
Three or more vs none | 1.04 | 0.56–1.94 |
Table 4 Relative risk for gall bladder stones in relation to selection of study population
Place/region | Populationselection | n | Sex distributionmale:female |
Chiayi[23] | Random sample | 923 | 1:1.0 |
Rome[32] | Factory | 2 325 | 1:1.1 |
Bergen[40] | Random sample | 1 371 | 1:1.1 |
Ulm[19] | Blood donors | 1 116 | 1:1.1 |
Copenhagen[44] | Random sample | 4 807 | 1:1.4 |
Chiang Mai[38] | Random sample | 6 146 | 1:1.5 |
Schwedt[41] | Factory | 1 616 | 1:1.6 |
Okinawa[17] | Inhabitants of an island | 2 584 | 1:1.7 |
Jiaotong[14] | Random sample | 15 856 | 1:2.0 |
M.I.C.O.L[24] | Random sample | 29 739 | 1:2.0 |
Römerstein[20] | Total survey | 2 498 | 1:2.1 |
Sirmione[21] | Total survey | 1 911 | 1:2.2 |
Cianciano[22] | Total survey | 1 804 | 1:2.3 |
Leutkirch | Random sample | 2 401 | 1:2.3 |
Table 5 Review of published studies addressing the effect of the factor “pregnancy” on the prevalence of gallbladder stones
Factor by which the prevalence of gallstone diseasein women with prior pregnancy is increased | 1.0–1.5 times | 1.6–2.5 times | 2.6–10 times | 11 – 50 times |
Studies showing a quantitative relation between cholecystolithiasis and pregnancy | 1966 Framingham[42] 1988 Sirmione[21] 1985 San Antonio[45] 1985 Maastricht[46] | 1982 Oxford[47] 1982 Kopenhagen[44] | 1979 Stockholm[48] 1982 Rom[32] 1986 Schwedt[41] 1986 Chianciano[22] 1991 Santiago[49] | 1988 Srinagar[15] |
Studies not showing a quantitative relation between cholecystolithiasis and pregnancy | 1956 Birmingham[50] 1970 Pima reservation[51] 1980 Boston[52] 1982 Oberpfuss[53] 1983 Oxford[54] 1984 Adelaide[55] 1989 Soweto[12] 1990 Dublin[43] 1995 Ulm[19] 1996 Römerstein[20] 2002 Leutkirch |
- Citation: Walcher T, Haenle MM, Kron M, Hay B, Mason RA, Schmiesing AFAV, Imhof A, Koenig W, Kern P, Boehm BO, Kratzer W. Pregnancy is not a risk factor for gallstone disease: Results of a randomly selected population sample. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(43): 6800-6806
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i43/6800.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6800