Brief Reports
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2005; 11(42): 6650-6655
Published online Nov 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i42.6650
Table 1 Characteristics of patients and lesions according to histology of mucosa resected at EMR (mean±SD)
LGDHGDIMCSMC
(no surgery)
Age (yr)60.6±8.861.76±11.856±4.273.6±8.3
BE length (cm)6.6±4.13.6±1.83.7±1.85.8±3.1
Size of lesion (mm)22.5±8.713±10.216±5.717.6±11.9
Metachronous lesion (%)
No5 (100)24 (88.9)2 (100)2 (100)
Yes-1 (3.7)--
No follow-up endoscopy (%)-2 (7.4)--
Total52722
Table 2 Selected studies on EMR in Barrett’s esophagus
AuthorNumber of patiensSize of lesionscm (mean)TechniqueHistologypre-EMRHistologypost-EMRChange in diagnosis (%)ComplicationsFollow-upmonths(mean)Recurrence
Seewald et al 2003 Germany[24]12Median 5EUS Snare5 HGD/ IMC (visible) 7 IMC2 BE 1 LGD 5 HGD75%Bl: 33% Stricture:17%Median: 90
(non-visible)
AC 4
Ahmad et al 200219/1010.5-3EUSAC 6AC 858%Bl: 11%>=240
USA[33]EMR-CHGD 6HGD 4
SnareNOS 7LGD 1
injectionBenign 6
May et al 200280NosEUSHGD 7AC: 11/80NosBl: 6%3424/78
Germany[17]EMR±PDTEC 73Stricture: 4%
Table 3 Selected studies on EMR in Barrett’s esophagus
AuthorNumber of ptsSize of lesionscm (mean)TechniqueHistologypre-EMRHistologypost-EMRChange in diagnosis (%)ComplicationsFollow-upMonths(mean)Recurrence
Buttar et al 2001 USA[34]178EUS VLD-PDTIMC: 7 AC: 10IMC: 7 AC: 1047%Bl: 6% Stricture: 30%13HGD (1)1 AC (1)
Injection
Nijhawan et al 2000 USA[35]257EUS Lift-and-cut VLD2 BE 8 LGD 5 HGD2 BE 3 LGD 5 HGD48%014.60
Injection9 AC13 AC
1 other2 other
Ell et al 2000350.9EUSHGD: 3HGD: 30Bl: 20%1211%
Germany[36]EMR±EC: 32EC: 32
injection