Gatselis NK, Georgiadou SP, Tassopoulos N, Zachou K, Liaskos C, Hatzakis A, Dalekos GN. Impact of parietal cell autoantibodies and non-organ-specific autoantibodies on the treatment outcome of patients with hepatitis C virus infection: A pilot study. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(4): 482-487 [PMID: 15641130 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i4.482]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Georgios N. Dalekos, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine, Academic Liver Unit and Research Laboratory of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Papakiriazi 22 str, 41222 Larissa, Greece. dalekos@med.uth.gr
Article-Type of This Article
Viral Hepatitis
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Alterations of anti-LKM reactivity in association with the response to therapy in the four anti-HCV positive/anti-LKM-positive patients.
Gender
Genotype
Anti-LKM titre
Response
1st
2nd
3rd
End of treatment
End of follow-up
M
1b
1/320
1/40
0
Responder
Sustained responder
F
1b
1/40
1/160
1/80
Responder
Relapser
F
2a/c
1/40
1/40
1/40
Non-responder
Non-responder
M
4
0
1/160
1/80
Non-responder
Non-responder
Table 4 Impact of ANA detection on sustained biochemical response of the patients.
Biochemical response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
n
Yes
No
P
ANA entry
Pos
31
13 (41.9)
18 (58.1)
0.017
Neg
26
20 (76.9)
6 (23.1)
ANA end of follow up
Pos
41
20 (48.8)
21 (51.2)
0.037
Neg
16
13 (81.3)
3 (18.7)
Table 5 Impact of PCA and ANA on sustained biochemical and virological response of the patients.
Combined sustained response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
n
Yes
No
P
PCA entry
Pos
9
0 (0)
9 (100)
0.022
Neg
48
19 (39.6)
29 (60.4)
ANA end of follow up
Pos
41
10 (24.4)
31 (75.6)
0.048
Neg
16
9 (56.3)
7 (43.7)
Table 6 Impact of PCA on sustained virological response of the patients.
Virological response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
n
Yes
No
P
PCA entry
Pos
9
0 (0)
9 (100)
0.02
Neg
48
20 (41.7)
28 (58.3)
Table 7 Impact of ANA and SMA alterations at the three time-points of investigation on the sustained virological response of the patients.
Virological response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
n
Yes
No
P
Alteration of ANA titres
Increase
20
8 (40)
12 (60)
0.02
Decrease
13
8 (61.5)
5 (38.5)
Constant
24
4 (16.7)
20 (83.3)
Alteration of SMA titres
Increase
14
3 (21.4)
11 (78.6)
0.003
Decrease
18
12 (66.7)
6 (33.3)
Constant
25
5 (20)
20 (80)
Table 8 Impact of ANA and SMA alterations at the three time-points of investigation on the sustained combined biochemical and virological response of the patients.
Combined sustained response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
n
Yes
No
P
Alteration of ANA titers
Increase
20
7 (35)
13 (35)
0.02
Decrease
13
8 (61.5)
5 (38.5)
Constant
24
4 (16.7)
20 (83.3)
Alteration of SMA titers
Increase
14
2 (14.3)
12 (85.7)
0.001
Decrease
18
12 (66.7)
6 (33.3)
Constant
25
5 (20)
20 (80)
Table 9 Impact of SMA alterations at the tree time-points of investigation on the sustained biochemical response of the patients.
Biochemical response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
n
Yes
No
P
Alteration of SMA titers
Increase
14
7 (50)
7 (50)
0.005
Decrease
18
16 (88.8)
2 (11.2)
Constant
25
10 (40)
15 (60)
Citation: Gatselis NK, Georgiadou SP, Tassopoulos N, Zachou K, Liaskos C, Hatzakis A, Dalekos GN. Impact of parietal cell autoantibodies and non-organ-specific autoantibodies on the treatment outcome of patients with hepatitis C virus infection: A pilot study. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(4): 482-487