Copyright
©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2005; 11(38): 6049-6052
Published online Oct 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049
Published online Oct 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049
Table 1 The comparison of severity, complication, mortality, and the length of stay in CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE II score
CTSI1 | Ranson score | APACHE II score | ||
Severity | Mild | 1.9±0.4 | 2.4±1.2 | 8.6±1.9 |
Severe | 6.1±0.5 | 3.1±0.8 | 10.2±2.1 | |
Complications | Present | 5.9±1.4 | 2.7±0.9 | 9.4±2.4 |
Absent | 2.1±0.61 | 2.5±1.1 | 8.7±1.6 | |
Mortality | Present | 5.3±1.7 | 2.3±0.5 | 7.3±1.3 |
Absent | 1.8±0.61 | 2.5±0.7 | 8.5±0.9 | |
Length of stay | ≥20 days | 5.6±1.6 | 2.6±1.1 | 9.8±0.9 |
<20 days | 2.7±1.11 | 2.9±0.9 | 8.9±1.2 |
Table 2 CTSI and outcome prediction
No. of patients | P | Odd’s ratio | ||
Death | CTSI≥ 5 | <0.05 | <0.05 | 15 |
CTSI <5 | ||||
Prolonged length of stay (20 d) | CTSI ≥5 | <0.05 | <0.05 | 17 |
CTSI <5 | ||||
Complications | CTSI≥ 5 | <0.05 | <0.05 | 8 |
CTSI <5 |
- Citation: Leung TK, Lee CM, Lin SY, Chen HC, Wang HJ, Shen LK, Chen YY. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(38): 6049-6052
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i38/6049.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049