Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2005; 11(12): 1818-1821
Published online Mar 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1818
Published online Mar 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1818
Table 1 Age distribution of MEED, PL and EC detected by cytological screening of 16763 persons.
Histology Grade | Age | Total | |||||
40 yr | 45 yr | 50 yr | 55 yr | 60 yr | 65 yr | ||
Normal (case, %) | 2718 (50.6) | 1518 (43.8) | 1094 (39.1) | 945 (35.6) | 651 (29.5) | 95 (30.7) | 7021 |
MEED | 1574 (29.3) | 1100 (31.7) | 928 (33.1) | 882 (33.2) | 758 (34.9) | 104 (33.1) | 5346 |
PL | 1056 (19.7) | 816 (23.6) | 745 (26.6) | 782 (29.5) | 720 (33.2) | 98 (31.7) | 4217 |
EC | 20 (0.4) | 29 (0.8) | 31 (1.1) | 46 (1.7) | 41 (1.9) | 12 (3.9) | 179 |
Total | 5368 | 3463 | 2798 | 2655 | 2170 | 309 | 16763 |
Table 2 Age distribution by endoscopic pathologic screening of 2013 persons.
Pathology Grade | Age | Total | |||||
40 yr | 45 yr | 50 yr | 55 yr | 60 yr | 65 yr | ||
Normal (case, %) | 746 (94.2) | 388 (84.7) | 239 (74.2) | 165 (73.3) | 83 (55.7) | 33 (49.3) | 1654 |
PL | 43 (5.4) | 57 (12.4) | 67 (20.8) | 39 (17.3) | 47 (31.5) | 17 (25.4) | 270 |
Early cancer | 3 (0.4) | 10 (2.2) | 11 (3.4) | 14 (6.2) | 11 (7.4) | 8 (11.9) | 57 |
Advanced cancer | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.7) | 5 (1.6) | 7 (3.1) | 8 (5.4) | 9 (13.4) | 32 |
Total | 792 | 458 | 322 | 225 | 149 | 67 | 2013 |
Table 3 Ridit value by histology by age distribution in comparison with standard group.
Age (yr) | Cases | Ridit Value | 95%CI |
451 | 3463 | 0.5 | |
40 | 5368 | 0.46 | (0.45-0.47) |
50 | 2798 | 0.53 | (0.51-0.54) |
55 | 2655 | 0.55 | (0.54-0.56) |
60 | 2170 | 0.58 | (0.57-0.59) |
65 | 309 | 0.59 | (0.55-0.62) |
Total | 16763 |
Table 4 Ridit value for endoscopic pathology by age distribution in comparison with standard group.
Age (yr) | Cases | Ridit Value | 95%CI |
451 | 458 | 0.5 | |
40 | 792 | 0.45 | (0.43-0.47) |
50 | 322 | 0.55 | (0.52-0.58) |
55 | 225 | 0.56 | (0.52-0.60) |
60 | 149 | 0.65 | (0.60-0.70) |
65 | 67 | 0.69 | (0.62-0.76) |
Total | 2013 |
Table 5 Average age of each histology grade by cytology screening.
Histology grade | Cases | Mean±SD | t value | P |
MEED | 5346 | 50.3±7.56 | 7.162 | <0.001 |
SEEDI | 3179 | 51.2±7.70 | 3.554 | <0.001 |
SEED II | 866 | 51.6±7.54 | 4.537 | <0.001 |
NEC | 172 | 52.4±7.14 | 5.527 | <0.001 |
EC | 179 | 54.4±7.23 |
Table 6 Average age of each pathology grade by endoscopic screening and tumor registration.
Pathology grade | Cases | Mean±SD | t value | P |
Mild dysplasia | 172 | 51.6±7.90 | 5.250 | <0.001 |
Moderate dysplasia | 157 | 53.5±7.42 | 4.22 | <0.001 |
Severe dysplasia | 53 | 51.4±7.26 | 4.764 | <0.001 |
Early cancer | 50 | 55.6±7.31 | 2.248 | <0.05 |
Advanced cancer1 | 9265 | 61.7±11.23 | 1.086 | >0.05 |
Advanced cancer | 31 | 56.7±6.76 |
- Citation: Chen ZF, Hou J, Ding ZW, Guo CL, Qiao CY, Song GH, Li SS, Zhang JH, He YT. Age scope of high-risk population for esophageal cancer in Ci county. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(12): 1818-1821
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i12/1818.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1818