Jan YY, Yeh CN, Yeh TS, Chen TC. Prognostic analysis of surgical treatment of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: Two decades of experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(12): 1779-1784 [PMID: 15793863 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1779]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yi-Yin Jan, M.D., FACS, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, China. ycn@adm.cgmh.org.tw
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Research
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Univariate analysis of factors influencing the overall survival of the 312 PCC patients.
Factors
Survival time (mo)
P
Median
mean
3-yr (%)
5-yr (%)
Gender
Male (n = 128)
7.79
14.66
11.78
2.27
Female (n = 184)
6.84
18.41
10.88
8.61
0.941
Age (yr)
≤58 (n = 163)
6.21
17.07
11.69
6.86
>58 (n = 149)
8.35
17.15
10.7
6.05
0.471
Symptoms
Positive (n = 303)
6.9
16.58
10.75
6
Negative (n = 9)
20.45
41.67
30.48
30.48
0.024
Physical examination
Positive (n = 222)
6.64
15.7
8.08
4.54
Negative (n = 90)
9.67
20.55
20.46
13.56
0.053
AST (IU/L)
≤34 (n = 121)
7.89
15.69
11.56
5.51
>34 (n = 161)
7.30
18.85
12.02
7.28
0.936
ALT (IU/L)
≤36 (n = 139)
7.33
14.94
9.26
5.15
>36 (n = 107)
8.35
21.38
15.12
9.3
0.326
ALP (IU/L)
≤94 (n = 63)
10.39
16.31
12.12
3.64
>94 (n = 214)
6.64
17.22
10.75
6.46
0.2143
Serum CEA (ng/dL)
>5 (n = 70)
4.57
9.58
1.99
1.99
≤5 (n = 103)
10.39
23.17
17.96
9.95
0.0001
Serum CA 19-9 (ng/dL)
>37 (n = 76)
7.4
11.93
10.27
N.A.
≤37 (n = 29)
13.28
25.49
23.76
15.84
0.008
Associated with biliary stones
With biliary stones (n = 186)
6.94
17.86
11.96
7.18
Without biliary stones (n = 126) 7.40
16.50
9.77
5.86
0.693
Type of operation
Hepatectomy (n = 157)
12.99
25.31
17.88
10.15
Non-hepatectomy (n = 155)
3.65
9.03
4.42
2.76
<0.0001
Table 5 Univariate analysis of factors influencing the overall survival of the 312 PCC patients.
Factors
Survival time (mo)
P
Median
mean
3-yr (%)
5-yr (%)
Mucobilia
Positive (n = 33)
24.07
45.79
40.3
25.65
Negative (n = 279)
6.48
13.05
7.41
3.89
<0.0001
Tumor spreading type
Papillary (n = 57)
22.59
38.19
31.77
20.42
Non-papillary (n = 255)
5.85
12.32
6.35
3.3
<0.0001
TNM staging
I (n = 17)
45.9
50.54
60.00
45
II (n = 58)
24.07
37.74
28.89
17.78
III (n = 88)
8.52
11.45
2.65
N.A
IV (n = 149)
4.18
7.66
6.08
N.A.
<0.0001
Tumor staging
Early stage (I+II) (75)
24.99
41.19
35.29
22.83
Advanced stage (III+IV) (237)
5.03
9.09
3.92
N.A.
<0.0001
Post-operative chemotherapy
With chemotherapy (n = 118)
11.44
24.25
17.74
11.88
Without chemotherapy (n = 194)
4.64
12.35
7.16
3.58
<0.0001
Post-operative radiotherapy
With radiotherapy (n = 63)
11.7
22.12
16.63
6.65
Without radiotherapy (n = 249)
6.25
15.89
9.65
7.17
0.0197
Table 6 Cox’s proportional hazards analysis.
Factors
Relative risk (95% confidence interval)
P
Mucobilia (without mucobilia/mucobilia )
2.185 (1.324–3.605)
0.002
Tumor spreading type (non-papillary/papillary)
1.455 (1.028–2.060)
<0.001
Type of operation (non-hepatectomy/hepatectomy)
1.946 (1.477–2.564)
<0.001
Tumor staging
(II/I)
1.637 (0.786–3.406)
0.188
(III/I)
3.334 (1.615–6.882)
0.001
(IV/I)
4.049 (1.940–8.449)
<0.001
Post-operative chemotherapy (no chemotherapy/chemotherapy)
1.823 (1.413–2.353)
<0.001
Citation: Jan YY, Yeh CN, Yeh TS, Chen TC. Prognostic analysis of surgical treatment of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: Two decades of experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(12): 1779-1784