Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2005; 11(11): 1582-1586
Published online Mar 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i11.1582
Published online Mar 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i11.1582
Table 1 Distribution of the total score of the quality of life in the patients.
Total scoreof qualityof life | 2002–2003 | 1999 | ||
Number of patients | % | Number of patients | % | |
<30 | 2 | 0.7 | 4 | 2 |
30- | 1 | 0.35 | 6 | 3 |
40- | 15 | 5.26 | 16 | 8 |
50- | 55 | 19.3 | 54 | 27 |
60- | 112 | 39.3 | 69 | 34.5 |
70- | 71 | 24.91 | 41 | 20.5 |
80- | 23 | 8.07 | 10 | 5 |
90–105 | 6 | 2.11 | 0 | 0 |
Table 2 Partial correlation analysis between nutrition intake and quality of life.
Nutrition | r | P | Nutrition | r | P |
Calorie | 0.22 | 0.0002 | Selenium | 0.24 | <0.0001 |
Protein | 0.25 | <0.0001 | Thiamine | 0.21 | 0.0004 |
Calcium | 0.21 | 0.0004 | Riboflavin | 0.25 | <0.0001 |
Iron | 0.19 | 0.0012 | Niacin | 0.25 | <0.0001 |
Zinc | 0.24 | <0.0001 | Vitamin C | 0.05 | 0.3891 |
Table 3 Means of nutrition intake in three groups of the patients by sex.
Nutrition mean | Total score of quality of life for male | Total score of quality of life for female | ||||||
<60 | 60-80 | >80 | P1 | <60 | 60-80 | >80 | P1 | |
Calorie (kJ) | 6947.93 | 7355.12 | 8301.17 | 0.08 | 6404.58 | 6726.34 | 13912.84 | <0.001 |
Protein (g) | 61.51 | 62.82 | 78.41 | 0.028 | 46.84 | 56.99 | 133.05 | <0.001 |
Calcium (mg) | 526.7 | 497.21 | 653.87 | 0.07 | 418.37 | 467.87 | 973.14 | <0.001 |
Iron (mg) | 21.22 | 20 | 27.98 | 0.034 | 15.01 | 18.6 | 46.67 | 0.002 |
Zinc (mg) | 12.78 | 12.71 | 18.38 | 0.002 | 10.24 | 12.54 | 23.7 | 0.025 |
Selenium (mg) | 24.33 | 24.98 | 30.74 | 0.028 | 20.38 | 23.89 | 40.58 | 0.122 |
Thiamine (mg) | 1.48 | 1.57 | 1.82 | 0.045 | 1.35 | 1.42 | 2.76 | 0.007 |
Riboflavin (mg) | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.88 | 0.015 | 1.06 | 1.36 | 3.02 | 0.001 |
Niacin (mg) | 11.72 | 13.36 | 16.39 | 0.036 | 10.89 | 12.45 | 27.35 | 0.007 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 94.95 | 79.87 | 98.03 | 0.551 | 69.99 | 81.91 | 95.31 | 0.865 |
Table 4 Means of daily nutrition intake in the 285 patients.
Nutrition | Male (n = 231) | Female (n = 54) | ||
Reference value | Mean±SD | Reference value | Mean±SD | |
Calorie (kJ) | 10080 | 7470.08 (2722.52)a | 8820 | 6900.39 (2684.72)a |
Protein (g) | 70 | 65.37 (34.12)a | 65 | 56.79 (30.21)a |
Calcium (mg) | 800 | 528.05 (385.61)a | 800 | 509.73 (498.37)a |
Iron (mg) | 12 | 21.54 (17.44)a | 18 | 18.57 (12.38) |
Zinc (mg) | 15 | 13.70 (9.42)a | 15 | 12.27 (6.81)a |
Selenium (mg) | 50 | 25.90 (12.68)a | 50 | 23.46 (13.30)a |
Thiamine (mg) | 1.2 | 1.60 (0.64)a | 1.1 | 1.45 (0.62)a |
Riboflavin (mg) | 1.2 | 1.49 (0.93)a | 1.1 | 1.34 (0.74)a |
Niacin (mg) | 12 | 13.69 (7.95)a | 11 | 12.54 (7.14) |
Vitamin C (mg) | 60 | 84.86 (107.39)a | 60 | 78.81 (83.93) |
Table 5 Result of stepwise regression at α = 0.05.
Factor | Standard parameter Standard | t | P | |
estimate | error | |||
Age (yr) | -0.119 | 0.012 | -2.12 | 0.035 |
Family income | 0.206 | 0.142 | 5.71 | <0.001 |
Way of operation | -0.151 | 0.366 | -2.75 | 0.007 |
Times of meals a day | 0.241 | 0.164 | 4.12 | <0.001 |
Exercise | 0.139 | 0.376 | 2.38 | 0.018 |
Table 6 Means of daily nutrition intake by way of operation.
Nutrition | Total gastrectomy | Partial gastrectomy(n = 200) | |
Times of meals(d) ≤3 (n = 44) | Times of meals(d) ≥4 (n = 41) | ||
Calorie (kJ) | 5553.66 | 7394.73 | 7759.08 |
Protein (g) | 46.26 | 65.04 | 67.39 |
Calcium (mg) | 406.13 | 536.43 | 548.5 |
Iron (mg) | 15.13 | 22.03 | 22.06 |
Zinc (mg) | 10.11 | 14.11 | 14.03 |
Selenium (mg) | 20.36 | 26.76 | 26.1 |
Thiamine (mg) | 1.17 | 1.63 | 1.72 |
Riboflavin (mg) | 1.09 | 1.43 | 1.55 |
Niacin (mg) | 9.71 | 14.16 | 14.17 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 57.41 | 88.66 | 89.35 |
- Citation: Tian J, Chen JS. Nutritional status and quality of life of the gastric cancer patients in Changle County of China. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(11): 1582-1586
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i11/1582.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i11.1582