Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 15, 2004; 10(20): 3070-3072
Published online Oct 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i20.3070
Table 1 Comparison of pathological parameters between two groups
GroupsTNM stage
Differentiation grade
Growth pattern
Lymphatic vessel invasion
Venous vessel invasion
IIIIIIVWellModeratelyPoorlyExpensivInfiltrativeNegativePositiveNegativePositive
Intervevtional111261191715221423325
Control162991292425291737468
P > 0.05P > 0.05P > 0.05P > 0.05P > 0.05
Table 2 Comparison of immunohistochemistry results between two groups
GroupsExpression of CD44V6
Expression of E-CD
PCNA LI (%)
-++++++-++++++
Interventional81451011139463.8 ± 17.6
Control1612818171813664.7 ± 18.0
P > 0.05P > 0.05P > 0.05
Table 3 Independent prognostic variables identified by Cox proportional hazard model
VariablesSEWalddfSigRExp(B)
TNM stage0.122016.311310.00010.17531.6304
Interventional chemotherapy0.25014.749110.02850.06811.6981
Growth pattern0.26074.010510.04170.07111.6953