Tian J, Chen ZC, Wu B, Meng X. Comparison of quality of life between urban and rural gastric cancer patients and analysis of influencing factors. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(20): 2940-2943 [PMID: 15378769 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i20.2940]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jun Tian, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, Fujian Province, China. tianjun@mail.fjmu.edu.cn
Article-Type of This Article
Gastric Cancer
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 15, 2004; 10(20): 2940-2943 Published online Oct 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i20.2940
Table 1 List of factors that may affect the quality of life of gastric cancer patients
Factor
Definition
Gender
Male 1 Female 2
Age (yr)
Marital status
Single 1 Married 2 Divorced 3 Widowed 4
Education
Primary school 1 Middle school 2 High school 3 University 4
Family income (per capita, Yuan)
Medical insurance
Yes 1 No 0
Clinical stage of tumor
1-4
Survival time (mo)
Surgery
2/3 gastrectomy 1, 4/5 gastrectomy 2, total gastrectomy 3
Number of chemotherapy programs
Time from the latest chemotherapy to the enrollment (mo)
Treatment of traditional Chinese medicine
Yes 1 No 0
Home nursing staff
Spouse 1 Other relatives 2 Housekeepers 3 None 4
Chemotherapy
Yes 1 No 0
Enhanced nutrition
Yes 1 No 0
Rehabilitating exercise
Yes 1 No 0
Table 2 The 21 parameters of the quality of life
Items
1
Sleep
2
Range of activities
3
Eating
4
Ability of using traffic vehicles independently
5
Ability of body movement
6
Ability to live independently
7
Housework
8
Pain
9
Recreational activities
10
Watching TV or listening to radio
11
Interest or hobby
12
Knowledge of cancer
13
Mental status
14
Fear of disease
15
Psychological pain
16
Connection with relatives and friends
17
Social contact
18
Disappointment
19
Confidence of fighting the disease
20
Intellectual activities
21
Attitude towards treatment
Table 3 Distributions of total scores in urban patients and rural patients
Total score
Urban
Rural
n
Percentage (%)
n
Percentage (%)
< 30
3
1.85
4
2.00
30-
3
1.85
6
3.00
40-
8
4.94
16
8.00
50-
17
10.49
54
27.00
60-
43
26.54
69
34.50
70-
59
36.42
41
20.50
80-
27
16.67
10
5.00
90-105
2
1.23
0
0.00
Table 4 Means and standard deviations of total scores in the two samples
Number of the patients
mean
SD
95% confidence interval
Urban
162
68.69
12.98
66.69-70.69
Rural
200
64.11
11.29
62.54-65.67
t = 3.5885
P = 0.0004
Table 5 Results of stepwise regression with urban patients
Variable
Regression coefficient
SEM
t
P
Age (yr)
-0.10620
0.02654
-4.00
0.0001
Family income
1.11909
0.36949
3.03
0.0032
Clinical stage of the tumor
-1.10772
0.52498
-2.11
0.0375
Time from the latest chemotherapy to the enrollment
0.09199
0.03876
2.37
0.0095
Home nursing staff
-2.98233
0.57659
-5.17
< 0.0001
Enhanced nutrition
1.80669
0.88221
2.05
0.0431
Rehabilitating exercise
1.01185
0.39245
2.58
0.0115
Table 6 Results of stepwise regression with rural patients
Variable
Parameter estimated
SEM
t
P
Family income
1.0860
0.45974
2.36
0.0193
Surgery
-14.24462
2.77803
5.12
< 0.0001
Enhanced nutrition
-2.73243
1.37834
1.98
0.0488
Rehabilitating exercise
-2.20909
0.87618
2.52
0.0125
Citation: Tian J, Chen ZC, Wu B, Meng X. Comparison of quality of life between urban and rural gastric cancer patients and analysis of influencing factors. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(20): 2940-2943