Colorectal Cancer Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 15, 2003; 9(3): 495-498
Published online Mar 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i3.495
Application of autologous tumor cell vaccine and NDV vaccine in treatment of tumors of digestive traet
Wei Liang, Tie-Mie Sun, Wen-Qing Yao, Li-Li Chen, Yu Jin, Chun-Ling Li, Fan-Juan Meng, Liaoning Provincal Tumor Research Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
Hui Wang, Department of Coloproctology Surgery of Liaoning Tumor Hospital, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by Scientific Foundation of Liaoning Province, No. 895215
Correspondence to: Wen-Qing Yao, Liaoning Provincal Tumor Research Institute, 44 xiaoheYan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China. yaowenq@mail.sy.ln.cn Telephone: +86-24-24324202
Received: August 3, 2002
Revised: August 23, 2002
Accepted: September 12, 2002
Published online: March 15, 2003

Abstract

AIM: To treat patients with stage I-IV malignant tumors of digestive tract using autologous tumor cell vaccine and NDV (Newcastle disease virus) vaccine, and observe the survival period and curative effect.

METHODS: 335 patients with malignant tumors of digestive tract were treated with autologous tumor cell vaccine and NDV vaccine. The autologous tumor cell vaccine received were assigned for long-term survival observation. While these failed to obtain the autologous tumor tissue were given with NDV vaccine for a received short-term observation on curative effect.

RESULTS: The colorectal cancer patients treated with autologous tumor cell vaccine were divided into two groups: the controlled group (subjected to resection alone) (n = 257), the vaccine group (subjected to both resection and immunotherapy) (n = 310). 25 patients treated with NDV immunotherapy were all at stage IV without having resection. In postoperation adjuvant therapy patients, the 5, 6 and 7-year survival rates were 66.51%, 60.52%, 56.50% respectively; whereas in patients with resection alone, only 45.57%, 44.76% and 43.42% respectively. The average survival period was 5.13 years (resection alone group 4.15 years), the median survival period was over 7 years (resection alone group 4.46 years). There were significant differences between the two groups. The patients treated with resection plus vaccine were measured delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions after vaccination, (indurative scope > 5 mm). The magnitude of DTH was related to the prognosis. The 5-year survival rate was 80% for those with indurations greater than 5 mm, compared with 30% for those with indurations less than 5 mm. The 1-year survival rate was 96% for 25 patients treated with NDV immunotherapy. The total effective rate (CR+PR) was 24.00% in NDV immunotherapy; complete remission (CR) in 1 case (4.00%), partial remission (PR) in 5 cases (20.00%), stabilizedin in 16 cases (64.00%), progression (PD) in 1 case (4.00%). After NDV vaccine immunotherapy, the number of NK cell increased and immune function imporved obviously.

CONCLUSION: The autologous tumor cell vaccine and NDV vaccine can prolong the patients’ life. NDV vaccine is notably effective for short-term with promotion of quality of life and can be used whenever necessary with good prospects.




INTRODUCTION

Malignant tumors of digestive tract is common. It is difficult to improve the survival rate only by resection plus radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This study reported 335 patients treated with autologous tumor cell vaccine and NDV vaccine. 310 of 335 patients with colorected cancer of stages I-IV received autologous tumor cell vaccine postoperatively and the controlled group (resection alone) constituted 257 patients. The duration of follow-up was 7 years. There were statistically significant differences in the survival rate, the median survival period and the mean survival period between the two groups and the controlled group. The 1-year survival rate was 96% for 25 late cancer patients treated with NDV vaccine. This study provided a basis for the clinical application of autologous tumor cell vaccine and NDV vaccine[1,2,5,6,24,25,26,30].

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical data

Those receiving autologous tumor cell vaccine is consisted of 567 patients with colorectal cancer in 1993-1995 with a further follow-up of 7-year. 25 patients with late cancer were given NDV vaccine from June, 2001 to June, 2002: 15 men, 10 women; 41 to 83-year-old, mean age 62.3 years,they were all at stage IV patients and were followed up for 1-year. 310 postoperative patients treated with autologous tumor cell vaccine consisted of 204 men and 106 women range from 19 to 79 years, mean age 55.8 years: 136 patients having Miles operation, 98 colonic operation, including 74 anterior resection and 2 partial resection. The resection alone group (controlled group) consisted of 257 patients: 155 men, 102 women; age ranged 18 to 77 years of age, mean age 55.1 years; among these,120 patients had Miles operation, 78 colonic operation, 59 anterior resection. The DTH reactions were observed in 20 patients treated with immunotherapy after resections. Among these 20 all were stage II, III colorectal cancer among them 10 were male and 10 female age ranged 35 to 65 years, mean age 52.7 years. The follow-up results were shown in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. The TNF stages were shown in Table 4.

Table 1 Follow-up results of survival status for colorectal can-cer patients with resection plus autelogous tumor cell vaccine from 1993 to 2000.
YearnSurvival period
01234567
1993-2000505050443935313129
1994-200013313312510494908575
1995-20001271271261161069893
Total310310301264239223209106
Table 2 Follow-up results of survival status for colorectal can-cer patients with resection alone from 1993 to 2000.
YearnSurvival period
01234567
1993-2000737371605441353433
1994-20009494856856474343
1995-200090908469575047
Total2572572401971671381257733
Table 3 Comparison of yearly survival rates of resected colorectal cancer patients in vaccination group and controll group.
YearnaYearly survival rates (% ± s-x)
012345
Vaccination group31097.05 ± 0.9784.35 ± 2.1076.42 ± 3.2371.12 ± 3.4366.51 ± 3.8460.52 ± 4.57
Controll group25793.16 ± 1.6074.83 ± 2.5162.50 ± 2.0650.58 ± 1.9945.57 ± 1.3244.76 ± 0.81
Table 4 TNF staging in colorectal cancer patients with resec-tion plus vaccine group and resection alone group.
TreatmentnTNF stages
IIIIIIIV
Resection plus vaccine31046(14.8%)121(39%)80(25.8%)63(20.3%)
Resection alone25755(21.4%)94(36.6%)66(25.7%)42(16.3%)
Total567101215146105
Preparation of autologous tumor cell vaccine

Material and reagent Tumor tissue speciacus (φ ≥ 1 cm), elemene for injection (Da Lian Jin Gang Pharmaceutical Factory), mitomycin C, 25% glutaraldehyde (E merk), RPMI 1640 complete culture media.

Method The tumor tissure obtained under sterile conditions was placed in a sterile container and sent to the lab in two hours. Prepare the suspended tumor cell solution by routine methods. Then add mitomycin C and elemene 0.3 mg/mL. placed in 37 °C incubator (0.5 h). heated at 42 °C for 30 min. centrifuged, washed, and fixed in 0.0625% glutaraldehyde (10 min). After washing out the fixation solution, the sterile suspended autologous tumor cell solution ( ≥ 107/mL) was then prepared for use.

Immune procedure First Vaccination: The Patients treated received first vaccination a week after surgical resection, once a week for four weeks.

Intensive immunotherapy: Began at 1 to 2 months intervals after the first vaccination.

Method of injection: The vaccine was injected in three adjacent sites each 3-5 an apact on the arterior arm or deltoid region. one 0.2 mL intradermically and two 0.4 mL hypodamically. DTH test: Prior to the vaccination and two weeks after vaccination, skin test was performed. For the controlls distilled water was used. DTH reaction was concided position when the indenation was at 72 hours > 5 mm (+) , 6-10 mm (++).

Statistical analysis

Using SPSS computer program, analyses were performed by t-test for the mean value between the two groups by life table and logrank test for survival rate, by graphical method and linear inner insert method for the median survival period and by Kaplan-Meier method for the mean survival period.

Preparation of NDV vaccine

Primary fluid of NDV La Sota IV weak toxicant stem was vaccinated in chick embryo chorioallantoic cavity. SPF fertilized egg was placed in the 37 °C incubator. On day 10, injecting 0.2 mL NDV diluted with 0.5% LH into the chorioallantoic cavity in sterile conditions, sealed it with wax, and obtained the virus after 72 hours in 37 °C incubator. Before getting the virus, placed the chick embryo overnight at 4 °C refrigerator. Then removed the eggshell in air champer, opened the egg membrance and aspirated the chorioallantoic fluid containing virus by sterile technique. The fluid was centrifuged for 30 minutes at low speed (2800 r/min, 800 g) to get rid of the sediment. The supernatants of NDV was centrifuged 60 minutes at low temperature and high speed (4 °C, 30000 r/ min, 90000 g) and the viruses were precipitated. Resuspended the virus sediment by pH7.2, 0.1 mol/L PBS, assayed the hemagglutinin unit (Hu) of NDV by 0.5% fresh chick erythrocyte suspended solution and then diluted to 1:1280 Hu/mL. The solution was packed into ampoules separately and stored at -20 °C. Unfreeze it before using.

Immune procedure

Injected 1-2 mL in three sites intradermally at deltoid muscle region, once every three days. Three times constituted one course, and the injections also could be given continually.

Immune function assay

Prior to and after the immunotherapy, assayed the NK, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+ by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

By life table method, the 7-year survival rate of the vaccination group was 56.5% and the median survival period was approximately 50%. Hence by graphical method the median survival period was over 7 years, whereas by linear inner insert method, the median survival period of the controll group was 4.46 years. The average survival period of vaccination group was 5.13 ± 0.60 years where that of the controlled group 4.15 ± 0.60 years (Table 5).

Table 5 Comparison of median survival period, mean survival period of resected colorectal cancer patients of vaccina-tion group and controlled group.
Treatment methodnMedian survival period (year)Mean survival period (year)
Resection plus vaccination group310> 7a5.13 ± 0.60b
Resection alone group2574.464.15 ± 0.60

The positive rate of DTH reactions in resection plus vaccine group was over 90% whereas in resection alone group all negative. Most active immunotherapy for patients succeeded (Table 6). The remission rate of late digestive tract carcinoma treated with NDV vaccine (Table 7, Table 8). The charge of immune function pre- and post-NDV vaccine therapy (Table 9).

Table 6 Comparison of fve-year survival rate, survival period of resected colorectal cancer patients in vaccination group with positive and negative DTH reaction.
DTH reactionsn5-year survival casesSurvival ratebaSurvival period (-x ± s)
Positive group10880%4.7 ± 0.67
Negative group10330%3.5 ± 1.80
Table 7 The remission rate of late cancer of digestive tract carcinoma treated with NDV vaccine.
Types of diseasenCR(%)PR(%)SD(%)PD(%)CR+PR(%)
Colorectal cancer1313804
Stomach cancer600500
Liver caner402102
Pancreatic head cancer100110
Gall bladder cancer100100
Total251(4.00%)5(20.00%)16(64.00%)1(4.00%)6(24.00%)
Table 8 Comparison of treatment courses and therapeutic ef-fect of colorectal cancer patients with NDV immunotherapy.
GroupnCRPRSDPDCR+PR
1 Course600510
> 2 Courses713304
Table 9 Immunobgice function prior to and after NDV vaccination therapy.
ItemnBefore therapy(-x ± s)After therapy (-x ± s)P
NK1024.65 ± 7.2136.58 ± 11.87< 0.05
CD3+1067.15 ± 2.4371.12 ± 2.86< 0.01
CD4+1038.23 ± 3.0141.62 ± 2.71< 0.01
CD8+1030.55 ± 1.2129.84 ± 2.43> 0.05
CD4+/CD8+101.23 ± 0.121.41 ± 0.13< 0.05
DISCUSSION

The major treatments of malignant tumors of digestive tract malignant tumor postoperatively are radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, it is very difficult to improve the 5-year survival rate. We treated these patients with autologous tumor cell vaccine and NDV vaccine and made a 7-year follow-up survey of postoperative patients with autologous tumor cell vaccine. The 5, 6, 7-year survival rate are 66.51%, 60.52%. 56.50%, respectively, whereas they were only 45.57%, 44.76% and 43.42% respectively in resection plus radiotherapy or chemotherapy group. The survival rate increased by 20.94%, 15.76%, 13.08%. The increase of amplitude arrived at 46.00%, 35.20% and 30.12% respectively. This indicated autologous tumor cell vaccine could really increase the long-term survival rate of colorectal cancer patients[7,9,10].

The median survival period increased more obviousely: for over 7-year in vaccination group but only 4.46 years in resection alone group, it increased by over 2.5 years. The amplitude of increase was 57%. The mean survival period was 5.13 years in vaccination group yet only 4.15 years in resection alone group, an increase of 1 year in average.

The DTH reaction in postoperative colorectal cancer patients showed positive reaction two weeks after the immunotherapy in over 90%, but negative before therapy. The 5-year survival rate was 80% in the positive response group, and the 30% in negative response group, the difference was significant. It demonstrated that active specific immunotherapy by autologous tumor cell vaccine could yield positive DTH reaction in resected colorectal cancer patients. The 5-year survival rate increased obviously as a result of augmented antitumor immunity after immunotherapy[2,3,7]. We conclude that most of the patients who are treated with active specific immunization lead to a specific antitumor effect. Our vaccine is effective in prevention of tumor progression. The protection achieved can be augmented by serial vaccinations and can be maintained for a long period of time[4-20].

With booming of biotherapy lately, more attention have been paid to NDV vaccine. Many reports from abroad showed some effectiveness of NDV in malignant tumor of digestive tract and malignant melanoma[21-23,27-29] with few adverse effects. After transfection NDV, immune response could be induced with production of cytokines and trigguing of active tumor vaccine reaction. In the 1950s, people tried to treat malignant tumor with virus and discovered that much virus had greater killing effect on tumor cells than on normal cells. For example, NDV-73-T could infect all kinds of human tumor cells, with intracellular replication, elicit cell fusion and multinuclear body, and the tumor cells die eventually. NDV had selective killing effect on tumor cells, but not the normal cells. Despite there were many reports about the antitumor effect of NDV[27-36], yet long-term observation on the use of NDV was scarce, especially about its side effects. The NDV vaccine given to 25 patients in our study were 2-6 courses, some of them 8 courses. The duration of continuous injection was over 3 months, no significant side effects were found. We compared the effectiveness of one course and two course in 13 colorectal cancer patients. See Table 8, the curative effect of the latter was superior to that of the former. A few patients had flu-like symptoms, such as fatigue, lowgrade-fever, soreness of joints. which disappeared in 1-2 days. Now we had treated 80 patients bearing all kinds of late malignant tumor with NDV vaccine. We found that the curative effects on urinary bladder cancer and colorecal cancer were notable. Take for instance, one bladder cancer patient developed a 2.0 × 2.0 cm tumor in the right wall of his bladder, having hematuria and 2.5 × 2.7 cm hypodermic metastatic nodule over his left thigh. After four courses of NDV immunotherapy, the mass in the bladder wall and the metastate nodule over his left thigh regressed, hematuria also ceased. One colon cancer patient had a 3.0 × 3.5 cm cauliflower-like tumor on the left wall of the rectum, about 4 cm away from the anus,having hematochezia. After four courses of NDV vaccine, the mass in the recturn regressed and hematochezia ceased. Another patient with primary liver cancer, measuring 5.5 × 7.2 cm before the NDV therapy, after three courses, the mass decreased somewhat to 5.5 × 5.3 cm and the backache ameliorated. NDV injection can remit patients in a late gastric cancer impending to death with extensive peritoneal and pelvic metastasis, anuria, comatous and mantained his life only by intravenous nutrients and renal dialysis. After 12 days of large doses of NDV vaccination, the patient became conscious and could urinate by himself, with stoppage of dialysis, and could eat a little, the survival period prolonged to 30 days. As from Table 9, we could see that NDV could improve the immune functions by activing the lymphocytes. The preliminary use of NDV showed a new thapeutic approach to the treatment of on late malignant tumors, especially for those who were inable to obtain the autologous tumor tissue. After NDV vaccination, the curative efficancy occures rapidly and long-term observation is undertaking. From this study we can expect that the NDV vaccine has a good prospect

Footnotes

Edited by Wu XN and Zhao M

References
1.  Mimori K, Mori M. [Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancers]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2002;103:468-471.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Indar A, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Durrant LG, Carmichael J, Scholefield JH. Current concepts in immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2002;47:458-474.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  de Kleijn EM, Punt CJ. Biological therapy of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:1016-1022.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Miyagi Y, Imai N, Sasatomi T, Yamada A, Mine T, Katagiri K, Nakagawa M, Muto A, Okouchi S, Isomoto H. Induction of cellular immune responses to tumor cells and peptides in colorectal cancer patients by vaccination with SART3 peptides. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:3950-3962.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Bartnes K. [Tumor antigens presented to T helper lymphocytes--critical components of the cancer vaccine]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001;121:2941-2945.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Zou SC, Qiu HS, Zhang CW, Tao HQ. A clinical and long-term follow-up study of peri-operative sequential triple therapy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2000;6:284-286.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Saeterdal I, Bjørheim J, Lislerud K, Gjertsen MK, Bukholm IK, Olsen OC, Nesland JM, Eriksen JA, Møller M, Lindblom A. Frameshift-mutation-derived peptides as tumor-specific antigens in inherited and spontaneous colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:13255-13260.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 202]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 202]  [Article Influence: 8.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Harris JE, Ryan L, Hoover HC, Stuart RK, Oken MM, Benson AB, Mansour E, Haller DG, Manola J, Hanna MG. Adjuvant active specific immunotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer with an autologous tumor cell vaccine: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E5283. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:148-157.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Zeh HJ, Stavely-O'Carroll K, Choti MA. Vaccines for colorectal cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:307-313.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Habal N, Gupta RK, Bilchik AJ, Yee R, Leopoldo Z, Ye W, Elashoff RM, Morton DL. CancerVax, an allogeneic tumor cell vaccine, induces specific humoral and cellular immune responses in advanced colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:389-401.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Durrant LG, Buckley TJ, Scholefield JH, Robins RA, Fielding K, Monson JR, Guillou P, Calvert H, Carmichael J. Randomized double-blind phase II survival study comparing immunization with the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody 105AD7 against placebo in advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:1443-1446.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Tartaglia J, Bonnet MC, Berinstein N, Barber B, Klein M, Moingeon P. Therapeutic vaccines against melanoma and colorectal cancer. Vaccine. 2001;19:2571-2575.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Safa MM, Foon KA. Adjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma and colorectal cancers. Semin Oncol. 2001;28:68-92.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Foon KA. Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2001;3:116-126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Smith AM, Justin T, Michaeli D, Watson SA. Phase I/II study of G17-DT, an anti-gastrin immunogen, in advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:4719-4724.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Rains N, Cannan RJ, Chen W, Stubbs RS. Development of a dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:347-351.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Woodlock TJ, Sahasrabudhe DM, Marquis DM, Greene D, Pandya KJ, McCune CS. Active specific immunotherapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: phase I study of an allogeneic cell vaccine plus low-dose interleukin-1 alpha. J Immunother. 1999;22:251-259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Suh KW, Piantadosi S, Yazdi HA, Pardoll DM, Brem H, Choti MA. Treatment of liver metastases from colon carcinoma with autologous tumor vaccine expressing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Surg Oncol. 1999;72:218-224.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Yamana H, Itoh K. [Specific immunotherapy with cancer vaccines]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000;27:1477-1488.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Chen W, Rains N, Young D, Stubbs RS. Dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy: potential for treatment of colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:698-705.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Yip D, Strickland AH, Karapetis CS, Hawkins CA, Harper PG. Immunomodulation therapy in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2000;26:169-190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Pecora AL, Rizvi N, Cohen GI, Meropol NJ, Sterman D, Marshall JL, Goldberg S, Gross P, O'Neil JD, Groene WS. Phase I trial of intravenous administration of PV701, an oncolytic virus, in patients with advanced solid cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2251-2266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 265]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 272]  [Article Influence: 12.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Schneider T, Gerhards R, Kirches E, Firsching R. Preliminary results of active specific immunization with modified tumor cell vaccine in glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol. 2001;53:39-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Schirrmacher V. [Anti-tumor vaccination]. Zentralbl Chir. 2000;125 Suppl 1:33-36.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Zorn U, Duensing S, Langkopf F, Anastassiou G, Kirchner H, Hadam M, Knüver-Hopf J, Atzpodien J. Active specific immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma: cellular and humoral immune responses. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 1997;12:157-165.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Sonoda K, Sakaguchi M, Okamura H, Yokogawa K, Tokunaga E, Tokiyoshi S, Kawaguchi Y, Hirai K. Development of an effective polyvalent vaccine against both Marek's and Newcastle diseases based on recombinant Marek's disease virus type 1 in commercial chickens with maternal antibodies. J Virol. 2000;74:3217-3226.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Schirrmacher V, Haas C, Bonifer R, Ahlert T, Gerhards R, Ertel C. Human tumor cell modification by virus infection: an efficient and safe way to produce cancer vaccine with pleiotropic immune stimulatory properties when using Newcastle disease virus. Gene Ther. 1999;6:63-73.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 100]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Csatary LK, Moss RW, Beuth J, Töröcsik B, Szeberenyi J, Bakacs T. Beneficial treatment of patients with advanced cancer using a Newcastle disease virus vaccine (MTH-68/H). Anticancer Res. 1999;19:635-638.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Batliwalla FM, Bateman BA, Serrano D, Murray D, Macphail S, Maino VC, Ansel JC, Gregersen PK, Armstrong CA. A 15-year follow-up of AJCC stage III malignant melanoma patients treated postsurgically with Newcastle disease virus (NDV) oncolysate and determination of alterations in the CD8 T cell repertoire. Mol Med. 1998;4:783-794.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Phuangsab A, Lorence RM, Reichard KW, Peeples ME, Walter RJ. Newcastle disease virus therapy of human tumor xenografts: antitumor effects of local or systemic administration. Cancer Lett. 2001;172:27-36.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 106]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 112]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Schirrmacher V, Griesbach A, Ahlert T. Antitumor effects of Newcastle Disease Virus in vivo: local versus systemic effects. Int J Oncol. 2001;18:945-952.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Zhang JK, Sun JL, Chen HB, Zeng Y, Qu YJ. Influence of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor on anti-hepatoma activities of human dendritic cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2000;6:718-720.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Termeer CC, Schirrmacher V, Bröcker EB, Becker JC. Newcastle disease virus infection induces B7-1/B7-2-independent T-cell costimulatory activity in human melanoma cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2000;7:316-323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Schirrmacher V, Bai L, Umansky V, Yu L, Xing Y, Qian Z. Newcastle disease virus activates macrophages for anti-tumor activity. Int J Oncol. 2000;16:363-373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Haas C, Ertel C, Gerhards R, Schirrmacher V. Introduction of adhesive and costimulatory immune functions into tumor cells by infection with Newcastle Disease Virus. Int J Oncol. 1998;13:1105-1115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  King DJ. A comparison of the onset of protection induced by Newcastle disease virus strain B1 and a fowl poxvirus recombinant Newcastle disease vaccine to a viscerotropic velogenic Newcastle disease virus challenge. Avian Dis. 1999;43:745-755.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]