Published online Jun 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i22.107197
Revised: April 11, 2025
Accepted: April 23, 2025
Published online: June 14, 2025
Processing time: 85 Days and 18.5 Hours
The machine learning model developed by Shi et al for predicting colorectal polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection represents a significant advan
Core Tip: This predictive model notably enhanced clinical decision-making for colorectal polyp surveillance, demonstrating high accuracy and ease of clinical implementation through a user-friendly online risk calculator. Although promising, its real-world utility depends on external validation, clinician training, and integration with the existing clinical guidelines.
- Citation: Kagawa Y. Clinical implications of a machine learning model predicting colorectal polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(22): 107197
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i22/107197.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i22.107197
We read with great interest the recent article by Shi et al[1] in the World Journal of Gastroenterology on the development and validation of a machine-learning-based predictive model for colorectal polyp recurrence one year after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). This innovative study addresses a significant clinical challenge, as recurrence rates following EMR remain notably high, ranging from 15% to 50%[2]. The approach proposed by Shi et al[1] significantly improved predictive accuracy, offering valuable advancements in clinical practice.
The primary strength of this model is the integration of multiple clinically relevant variables including patient age, smoking habits, family history, polyp characteristics, and history of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection[1,3]. The inclusion of H. pylori infection as a risk factor is particularly noteworthy and is consistent with previous findings regarding its role in gastrointestinal pathology[3]. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm demonstrates exceptional predictive accuracy, achieving an impressive area under the curve of 0.963 in prospective validation, considerably surpassing conventional predictive methods[1,4]. The model was trained on a dataset comprising 830 patients, with features selected through a supervised process, incorporating clinical relevance and statistical significance.
Clinically, this model can accurately identify high-risk patients, with significant implications. By stratifying recurrence risk, clinicians can tailor follow-up intervals, potentially improving patient outcomes while optimising healthcare resources[4,5]. Nonetheless, it is important to recognise that the model performance may vary across different clinical environments, and external validation in diverse populations is critical to determine its generalisability. Additionally, the interpretability of complex machine-learning models may limit their immediate adoption. Furthermore, the inclusion of an accessible online risk calculator in the model facilitates its immediate clinical application, equipping clinicians with real-time decision support for individualised patient management[1]. However, for successful implementation, clinician training and patient education should be promoted to support the use of these tools in routine practice.
In addition, the integration of this model into existing guidelines, such as those of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, could enhance the personalisation of surveillance strategies.
We strongly advocate the integration of this machine-learning-based predictive model in routine clinical practice. This tool demonstrates the potential of precision medicine, refines surveillance strategies, and directs resources more efficiently to improve colorectal cancer prevention and patient care.
1. | Shi YH, Liu JL, Cheng CC, Li WL, Sun H, Zhou XL, Wei H, Fei SJ. Construction and validation of machine learning-based predictive model for colorectal polyp recurrence one year after endoscopic mucosal resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2025;31:102387. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014;46:388-402. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 200] [Cited by in RCA: 273] [Article Influence: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
3. | Papastergiou V, Karatapanis S, Georgopoulos SD. Helicobacter pylori and colorectal neoplasia: Is there a causal link? World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:649-658. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in CrossRef: 36] [Cited by in RCA: 39] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM, Regula J, Bretthauer M, Chaussade S, Dekker E, Ferlitsch M, Gimeno-Garcia A, Jover R, Kalager M, Pellisé M, Pox C, Ricciardiello L, Rutter M, Helsingen LM, Bleijenberg A, Senore C, van Hooft JE, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Quintero E. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020;52:687-700. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 150] [Cited by in RCA: 300] [Article Influence: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Deo RC. Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation. 2015;132:1920-1930. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1155] [Cited by in RCA: 1903] [Article Influence: 211.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (6)] |