Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2025; 31(10): 103454
Published online Mar 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.103454
Advances in imaging techniques for tumor microenvironment evaluation in hepatocellular carcinoma
Li-Li Wang, Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, China
Fa-Chang Zhang, Han-Xin Xu, Dian-Dian Deng, Bing-Jie Ren, Qi Tan, Ya-Xin Liu, Wen-Hui Zhao, Jia-Le Lu, First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, China
ORCID number: Li-Li Wang (0000-0002-5348-565X); Fa-Chang Zhang (0009-0009-6692-6344).
Co-first authors: Li-Li Wang and Fa-Chang Zhang.
Author contributions: Zhang FC contributed to the article drafting and critically reviewing the academic content of the article; Xu HX, Deng DD, and Ren BJ participated in the literature collection, checking and revising the content of the paper; Tan Q, Liu YX, Zhao WH, and Lu JL contributed to the creation of tables and figures, modifying the paper’s format; Wang LL contributed to the conceptualization and design of the paper, critically reviewing the academic content of the article, financial support. Wang LL and Zhang FC contributed equally to this study and are recognized as co-first authors.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 82360132; and the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, No. ldyyyn2020-14.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Li-Li Wang, MD, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Radiology, The First Hospitals of Lanzhou University, No. 1 Donggangxi Road, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, China. wangll19@lzu.edu.cn
Received: November 21, 2024
Revised: December 31, 2024
Accepted: February 11, 2025
Published online: March 14, 2025
Processing time: 98 Days and 13.4 Hours

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in the development and treatment of liver cancer, which ranks sixth in incidence and third in mortality worldwide, according to the “Global Cancer Statistics 2022”. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common form of liver cancer, is heavily influenced by the TME, which affects tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and the response to various treatments. Despite advancements in surgery, liver transplantation, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, the complexity of the TME often limits treatment efficacy, especially in advanced-stage HCC cases. The TME consists of a dynamic interaction between tumor cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, blood vessels, and signaling molecules, all of which contribute to cancer progression and therapy resistance. Assessing the HCC TME is essential for designing effective, personalized treatments and improving patient outcomes. Recent research highlights the value of imaging technologies as non-invasive tools to evaluate the TME, offering new possibilities for more targeted therapies and better prognosis monitoring in HCC patients.

Key Words: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Tumor microenvironment; Imaging diagnosis; Non-invasive assessment; Molecular imaging

Core Tip: Imaging technologies play a crucial role in the preoperative assessment of the tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma. By evaluating key features such as vascularity, immune infiltration, and stromal components, these techniques provide valuable insights into tumor biology. A comprehensive assessment of the tumor microenvironment allows for the development of personalized treatment strategies, optimizing therapeutic outcomes for liver cancer patients. Advanced imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography, help predict tumor behavior and response to treatment, ultimately contributing to more precise and effective clinical decision-making.



INTRODUCTION

Liver cancer is one of the major cancers worldwide and is the most common tumor in the digestive system, characterized by high invasiveness and high mortality rates. According to the “2022 Global Cancer Statistics”, liver cancer ranks sixth in incidence and third in mortality among all cancers globally, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for 85% of primary liver cancer cases[1]. The prognosis for most HCC patients is poor, primarily because the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and effective treatment options are limited, resulting in only a small number of patients being eligible for curative treatment. This makes the treatment of HCC particularly challenging. The complexity of the HCC tumor microenvironment (TME) limits treatment efficacy for many patients, and long-term outcomes are significantly influenced by the TME. Therefore, assessing the HCC-TME is particularly important. The TME plays a critical role in cancer biology, influencing not only tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis but also the tumor’s response to systemic therapies and local treatments such as thermal ablation and resistance. The TME is a highly dynamic and heterogeneous combination of tumor cells, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, tumor-associated fibroblasts, blood and lymphatic vessels, nerve fibers, signaling molecules, and extracellular matrix, which interact and influence each other, collectively shaping the TME and affecting tumor development, progression, and cellular adaptation[2]. The TME can promote tumor growth, angiogenesis, invasion, and immune evasion by cancer cells, while also performing immune surveillance and immune editing on tumor cells[3]. In recent years, significant contributions have been made to the research and assessment of the TME, particularly in the application of imaging technologies to the TME. Imaging techniques not only assess the tumor itself but also evaluate the TME. This article will review the application of imaging technologies in HCC-TME, providing new ideas and methods for the personalized treatment, efficacy assessment, and prognosis of HCC patients.

MOLECULAR IMAGING TECHNIQUES IN THE APPLICATION OF HYPOXIC ENVIRONMENTS IN HCC

Hypoxia and low oxygen levels are significant markers and important features of solid tumors, playing a crucial role in regulating the TME. Assessing hypoxia is essential for effective cancer treatment. Due to the rapid growth of HCC cells, insufficient blood supply occurs, and the proliferation of cancer cells consumes large amounts of oxygen, leading to the formation of a hypoxic TME[4]. The tumor hypoxic microenvironment is closely related to hypoxia-inducible factors, particularly its subtype hypoxia-inducible factors-1α, whose signaling pathways have been explored as potential therapeutic targets for future HCC management[5]. Recent studies have found that low mechanical index (= 0.3) ultrasound combined with microbubble contrast agents can effectively alleviate tumor hypoxia, reduce levels of hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors, and inhibit radioresistance. This combined treatment represents a novel and promising approach to reversing hypoxia in HCC[6]. Fluorescent probes and nanoprobe technologies have been designed to emit detectable light signals in specific biological or chemical environments, allowing for real-time monitoring of hypoxia in the TME. An iridium-based optical probe has been found to simultaneously sense acidity and hypoxia, showing great application potential in hypoxic imaging[7]. Furthermore, researchers have synthesized a hypoxia-responsive probe based on a flavin dye containing azo groups, which detects hypoxia and normoxia conditions in cancer cells through a reaction catalyzed by reductases. Results indicate that, compared to normal conditions, the fluorescence intensity under hypoxic conditions increased approximately tenfold after 15 minutes and 26-fold after 60 minutes[8]. Hypoxia-targeted radiopharmaceuticals using positron emission tomography (PET) have been employed for detecting and treating tumor hypoxia. Nitroimidazole, a bioreducible moiety, becomes reactive under low intracellular oxygen concentrations. The reduction of O2 leads to a failure of the reoxidation of nitro free radical anions, resulting in the formation of reactive substances that covalently bind to cellular proteins or DNA, thereby distinguishing hypoxic tissues from normoxic tissues. This technique has been widely applied for hypoxia detection, and PET imaging can detect tumors as small as 1 millimeter, providing better diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of drug responses[9,10]. Related studies have shown that nitroimidazole not only has unique advantages in hypoxia but also exhibits strong anti-tumor activity. Additionally, nitroimidazole grafts can enhance targeted drug delivery[11]. Moreover, fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole, which binds to intracellular macromolecules in hypoxic environments after reduction, cannot be reoxidized and washed out. In HCC orthotopic mouse models, significantly higher standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole were found compared to non-cancerous liver groups, demonstrating tumor hypoxia, while 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose did not indicate tumor hypoxia[12]. Furthermore, studies have shown that tumor cells metabolize 11C-acetate under hypoxic conditions, with increased uptake of 11C-acetate in HCC orthotopic mouse models. Gene expression analysis indicated that the PET phenotype is associated with upregulation of characteristic hypoxic features, suggesting that 11C-acetate uptake correlates with hypoxic gene expression and poorer prognosis[13]. Radiomic features from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) can predict hypoxia-inducible factors expression, indirectly predicting hypoxia, with an accuracy of 0.795 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.719[14]. This technology holds potential application value in assessing hypoxia in HCC. A study involving 30 HCC patients with cirrhosis found that blood oxygen level-dependent 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could assess changes in blood oxygen levels following transcatheter arterial embolization treatment[15]. Despite significant achievements in animal studies with PET imaging and many tracers showing great application value, high radiation exposure, high examination costs, and limitations in clinical applications for HCC remain major drawbacks. In contrast, MRI, as a non-invasive diagnostic technique, shows unique advantages in availability, repeatability, high sensitivity to varying hypoxia levels, and excellent spatial resolution, providing new insights for assessing local tumor hypoxia (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Hepatocellular carcinoma tumor microenvironment and imaging techniques. HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; PET: Positron emission tomography; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; DCE-MRI: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; IVIM-MRI: Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging; DW-MRI: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; MRS: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; DC: Dendritic cell; TAF: Tumor-associated fibroblast; 18F-FDG PET: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.
ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF HCC GLYCOLYSIS

Changes in tumor metabolism are significant markers of cancer, as cancer cells strongly upregulate glucose uptake and glycolysis to produce biomolecules crucial for their survival, proliferation, and metastasis[16]. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is a glucose analogue that follows the same metabolic pathway as glucose. When the glycolytic rate in cancer cells increases, the uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in tumor tissues also rises, making 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET useful for detecting the upregulation of glycolysis[17]. In clinical and research settings, glycolytic indicators for assessing tumor cell glucose metabolism include the maximum and average standardized uptake values of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, peak standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. These indicators can help evaluate tumor glycolysis, providing key information for diagnosis and treatment. In a study involving 47 HCC patients treated with 90Y transarterial radioembolization, researchers conducted 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans before treatment and measured each patient’s maximum tumor standardized uptake value to average normal liver standardized uptake value ratio, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. The results indicated that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT more accurately assessed tumor glycolysis, with high total lesion glycolysis being an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. The one-year overall survival rate for patients with low total lesion glycolysis was 72.9%, while it was 33.3% for patients with high total lesion glycolysis[18]. Additionally, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT can predict complete response in HCC patients undergoing transarterial radioembolization by measuring total lesion glycolysis[19]. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can also monitor elevated lactate levels in cirrhotic HCC patients, closely related to HCC glycolysis, with lactate levels serving as indicators for assessing glycolysis[20]. Hyperpolarized 13C MRS imaging is an emerging technology that can significantly enhance the MR signals of 13C-enriched molecules, particularly using 13C-rich pyruvate probes, providing metabolic information unattainable by non-invasive techniques and showing potential application value in monitoring downstream glycolysis[21]. In rat HCC models, Bliemsrieder et al[22] proposed 13C MRS imaging techniques for observing glycolytic changes in HCC, offering new possibilities for non-invasive assessment of HCC glycolysis. Additionally, pyruvate can serve as a promising probe molecule to distinguish particularly aggressive tumor phenotypes[22]. In clinical settings, inhibiting HCC glycolysis plays an important role in suppressing HCC development.

IMAGING TECHNIQUES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ANGIOGENESIS IN HCC

HCC is a typical hypervascular tumor, characterized by abnormal angiogenesis. This process is crucial for cancer cells to obtain nutrients and oxygen and serves as the basis for tumor growth, progression, invasion, and metastasis. Recent studies have shown that contrast-enhanced ultrasound can clearly visualize small lesions and surrounding vascular structures. In a prospective study involving 66 HCC patients receiving anti-angiogenic combination therapy, quantitative parameters obtained from contrast-enhanced ultrasound were found to predict the efficacy of the therapy, such as rise time ratio, time to peak ratio, decline time ratio, and peak enhancement ratio, with the rise time ratio being an independent predictive factor[23]. Furthermore, Xia et al[24] conducted a prospective assessment using contrast-enhanced ultrasound on 31 surgically confirmed HCC cases, calculating microvascular density and microvascular area percentage, discovering a strong correlation between microvascular density and HCC, enabling dynamic visualization of tumor microcirculation. Copper is an essential nutrient in mammals and acts as a cofactor in various physiological processes, playing a significant role in angiogenesis by stimulating endothelial cell proliferation in both benign and malignant conditions. The potential of 64Cu PET in diagnosing HCC angiogenesis and targeted therapy is substantial[25]. Additionally, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates unique advantages in assessing HCC microcirculation. In an evaluation of 52 HCC patients, its perfusion parameters (Ktrans, Kep, D*, f) showed significant positive correlations with microvascular density in HCC (r = 0.892, 0.808, 0.589, 0.543; P = 0.000, 0.000, 0.001, 0.003), with Ktrans showing the highest sensitivity, underscoring its importance in assessing HCC angiogenesis[26]. In evaluating anti-angiogenic therapies, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI clearly demonstrated significant reductions in perfusion values. Ki67 and CD34 are histological markers reflecting tumor cell proliferation and microvascular density. In a retrospective study of HCC patients, the T1 relaxation time and signal intensity of Gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI were significantly associated with Ki67 expression and microvascular density, with a 20-minute relaxation time showing high diagnostic value for high Ki67 expression and high microvascular density in HCC tissue[27,28]. MRI fat fraction quantification can also assess HCC proliferation and vascular invasion in a clinical study of 66 patients[29]. Moreover, diffusion-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion modeling also have potential application value in assessing angiogenesis in HCC, particularly in quantifying vascular endothelial growth factor. Studies indicate a significant positive correlation between the fast apparent diffusion coefficient (D*) and vascular endothelial growth factor (P < 0.001), which can be used for non-invasive assessment of angiogenesis in HCC[30]. The trabecular subtype of HCC is an aggressive variant associated with angiogenesis and an immunosuppressive TME. CT radiomics models can accurately predict the prognosis and efficacy of HCC patients with the trabecular subtype. Non-invasive radiomics models based on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI can predict preoperative vascular endothelial growth factor status by calculating the AUC, with training set [AUC = 0.936, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.898-0.974] and testing set (AUC = 0.836, 95%CI: 0.728-0.944), serving as reliable prognostic markers for vascular endothelial growth factor levels in HCC[31,32]. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI radiomics can also evaluate microvascular density in HCC patients, greatly assisting in the assessment of HCC[33]. In addition, the poor prognosis of HCC is related to angiopoietin 2, and the radiomics model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI can be used to evaluate the expression of angiopoietin 2 and indirectly evaluate the angiogenesis of HCC[34].

IMAGING OF EXTRACELLULAR PH IN HCC AND ITS APPLICATION IN MONITORING TUMOR TREATMENT

A decrease in pH is a significant characteristic of the HCC TME. HCC is often associated with severe hypoxia and high glycolytic activity, leading to the accumulation of large amounts of lactate, carbon dioxide, and pyruvate, which in turn causes a drop in pH[35]. MRS is commonly used to analyze metabolites and chemical compositions in living tissues and plays a vital role in pH quantification. Savic et al[36] detected pH values in HCC models following transarterial embolization and radiotherapy using MRS imaging. The results indicated a significant reduction in pH in untreated tissues. Multimodal imaging showed that after transarterial embolization and radiotherapy, tumors immediately exhibited sustained devascularization, with necrosis gradually increasing, suggesting that MRS-based pH measurement can serve as a longitudinal monitoring tool for viable tumors. Moreover, normalizing tumor pH through treatment may act as a biomarker for positive treatment outcomes[36]. Additionally, a 3T MRI scanner is a high-field MRI device that provides higher signal-to-noise ratios, faster scanning speeds, and improved image resolution, making it widely used in clinical diagnostics and research[37]. Coman et al[38] mapped the pH values of liver parenchyma and tumor margins in a rabbit HCC model using 3T MRI and validated the accuracy using pH electrodes in vitro, demonstrating its potential for clinical translational applications in monitoring tumor invasiveness and treatment outcomes.

APPLICATION OF IMAGING TECHNIQUES IN THE IMMUNE MICROENVIRONMENT OF HCC

In recent years, novel therapeutic strategies such as cancer immunosuppressive therapy have significantly extended the lifespan of patients. Although systemic treatment for HCC has undergone a major paradigm shift, treatment for advanced HCC remains insufficient due to the lack of evidence related to treatment resistance and response prediction. Therefore, elucidating the immune environment of HCC is critical to improving core therapeutic strategies and prognosis for HCC patients[39]. Aghighi et al[40] conducted ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI imaging on patients with osteosarcoma and lymphoma. Ferumoxytol, a superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle, is efficiently taken up by tumor-associated macrophages. By using ferumoxytol as a contrast agent, MRI can capture signal changes related to the number of tumor-associated macrophages in tumors, and the T2-weighted imaging signal enhancement in MRI images was significantly correlated with the density of CD68+ and CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages. Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI can be used as a surrogate biomarker for tumor-associated macrophages in malignant tumors. Movahedi et al[41] used macrophage mannose receptors and single-photon emission CT, and Jiang et al[42] tracked tumor-associated macrophages in mouse liver cancer using Cy7-labeled deoxyglucose and near-infrared fluorescence imaging, confirming the possibility of tumor-associated macrophage imaging in HCC. However, its application in HCC patients remains limited. Although studies quantifying tumor-associated macrophages in HCC are currently limited, this field holds great research potential. Studies have shown that forkhead box M1 is a proliferation-specific transcriptional regulator that promotes the migration of various immune cells, including macrophages, T cells, B cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells[43]. Dual-region CT radiomics can predict forkhead box M1 expression and prognosis in HCC. Researchers constructed a radiomics score significantly associated with forkhead box M1 by extracting radiomic features from both tumor and peritumoral regions. This score can serve as an independent predictor of immune cell infiltration in HCC, providing a new perspective on the characterization of the HCC immune microenvironment[44]. Programmed death receptor 1 is a key immune checkpoint molecule, mainly expressed on the surface of activated T cells, B cells, and other immune cells. Programmed death receptor 1 is an important immunosuppressive molecule that enables tumors to acquire immune escape capability. Monitoring programmed death receptor 1 expression can help assess the efficacy of immunotherapy for HCC. Related studies have established prediction models and radiomics-based immune scores using MRI radiomics to effectively quantify programmed death receptor 1 and observe the therapeutic response to anti programmed death receptor 1 immunotherapy. Research indicates that MRI radiomics models may have potential guidance in predicting programmed death receptor 1 efficacy for HCC immunotherapy[45]. Moreover, contrast-enhanced CT radiomics and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI radiomics can quantitatively analyze CD3+ and CD8+ T cells, further providing a basis for the non-invasive quantification and assessment of the HCC immune microenvironment, as well as for monitoring the efficacy of immunotherapy[46,47].

CONCLUSION

Although the imaging techniques discussed hold significant promise in research settings, their clinical adoption remains constrained by technical complexity and infrastructure demands. These techniques often rely on advanced equipment, intricate image processing algorithms, and specialized expertise. For example, implementing high-resolution MRI requires costly hardware and optimized scanning protocols, which pose significant challenges in resource-limited healthcare settings. To address these barriers, future research should focus on simplifying the deployment of these technologies or developing practical alternatives that reduce costs and complexity, thereby promoting broader clinical use. High costs play a pivotal role in determining the economic feasibility of integrating emerging imaging technologies into clinical practice. Comprehensive cost-effectiveness analyses are critical in this context. For early-stage liver cancer patients, imaging-based assessments of the TME may have limited impact on treatment decisions. Conversely, for patients with advanced or recurrent disease, such technologies could significantly influence clinical outcomes. Furthermore, not all HCC patients are suitable candidates for these advanced imaging methods. Studies highlight substantial variations in the demand for and benefits of imaging technologies across patient subgroups. For instance, advanced HCC patients often require imaging focused on tumor metabolic activity and immune microenvironment evaluation, while early-stage patients prioritize angiogenesis and local tissue characteristics. Future research should systematically compare the diagnostic accuracy, predictive power, and clinical feasibility of these technologies to provide more tailored recommendations for specific patient populations. Emerging imaging techniques offer not only enhanced diagnostic precision for HCC but also the potential to transform treatment strategies. By dynamically monitoring the TME, these technologies enable more accurate predictions of patient responses to targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This imaging-guided treatment model could significantly advance personalized care, facilitating the development of tailored treatment plans that adapt to individual tumor dynamics.

TME is intricately and closely linked to tumor hypoxia, energy metabolism, pH levels, and the immune environment. In-depth research into TME-related mechanisms can help identify effective therapeutic targets, formulate personalized treatment strategies, and develop new drugs. Therefore, imaging technologies, as non-invasive tools, offer new ideas and methods for studying the TME. By developing TME-related imaging biomarkers through molecular imaging technologies, clinicians can be assisted in diagnosing and monitoring tumors, adjusting personalized treatment plans, and improving patient outcomes, making this a field with broad clinical development prospects and significant importance.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all those who have supported and contributed to this work.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Novelty: Grade A, Grade A, Grade A

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

P-Reviewer: Dong WK; Karagiannakis DS S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zheng XM

References
1.  Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229-263.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 72]  [Cited by in RCA: 1262]  [Article Influence: 1262.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Naser R, Fakhoury I, El-Fouani A, Abi-Habib R, El-Sibai M. Role of the tumor microenvironment in cancer hallmarks and targeted therapy (Review). Int J Oncol. 2023;62:23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Piwocka O, Piotrowski I, Suchorska WM, Kulcenty K. Dynamic interactions in the tumor niche: how the cross-talk between CAFs and the tumor microenvironment impacts resistance to therapy. Front Mol Biosci. 2024;11:1343523.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Sin SQ, Mohan CD, Goh RMW, You M, Nayak SC, Chen L, Sethi G, Rangappa KS, Wang L. Hypoxia signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma: Challenges and therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2023;42:741-764.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Du D, Liu C, Qin M, Zhang X, Xi T, Yuan S, Hao H, Xiong J. Metabolic dysregulation and emerging therapeutical targets for hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:558-580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 285]  [Article Influence: 95.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Zhang Y, Zhang J, Luo T, Cai Z, Yang G, Li H, Wei J, Zhu Q, Li P, Dong X, Liu Z. Sononeoperfusion effect by ultrasound and microbubble promotes nitric oxide release to alleviate hypoxia in a mouse MC38 tumor model. Ultrason Sonochem. 2023;100:106619.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Han Z, Wang Y, Chen Y, Fang H, Yuan H, Shi X, Yang B, Chen Z, He W, Guo Z. A novel luminescent Ir(iii) complex for dual mode imaging: synergistic response to hypoxia and acidity of the tumor microenvironment. Chem Commun (Camb). 2020;56:8055-8058.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Pewklang T, Wet-Osot S, Wangngae S, Ngivprom U, Chansaenpak K, Duangkamol C, Lai RY, Noisa P, Sukwattanasinitt M, Kamkaew A. Flavylium-Based Hypoxia-Responsive Probe for Cancer Cell Imaging. Molecules. 2021;26:4938.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Nguyen AT, Kim HK. Recent Developments in PET and SPECT Radiotracers as Radiopharmaceuticals for Hypoxia Tumors. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1840.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Rashed FB, Diaz-Dussan D, Mashayekhi F, Macdonald D, Nation PN, Yang XH, Sokhi S, Stoica AC, El-Saidi H, Ricardo C, Narain R, Ismail IH, Wiebe LI, Kumar P, Weinfeld M. Cellular mechanism of action of 2-nitroimidazoles as hypoxia-selective therapeutic agents. Redox Biol. 2022;52:102300.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Meng T, Li Y, Tian Y, Ma M, Shi K, Shang X, Yuan H, Hu F. A Hypoxia-Sensitive Drug Delivery System Constructed by Nitroimidazole and its Application in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022;23:167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Tan KV, Yang X, Chan CY, Shi J, Chang HC, Chiu KW, Man K. Non-invasive PET/MR Imaging in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Vis Exp. 2022;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Chiu KWH, Tan KV, Yang X, Zhu X, Shi J, Chiang CL, Chan L, Hui Y, Khong PL, Man K, Wong JWH. Prognostic PET [(11)C]-acetate uptake is associated with hypoxia gene expression in patients with late-stage hepatocellular carcinoma - a bench to bed study. Cancer Imaging. 2024;24:42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Hu Z, Liang H, Zhao H, Hou F, Hao D, Ji Q, Huang C, Xu J, Tian L, Wang H. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics signature for predicting hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Clin Radiol. 2023;78:e543-e551.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Li B, Xu A, Huang Y, Peng L, Xiang K, Li Q, Tang D, You H, Tan F, Wang N. Oxygen-Challenge Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of Early Change of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Chemoembolization: A Feasibility Study. Acad Radiol. 2021;28 Suppl 1:S13-S19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  El Sayed SM. Biochemical Origin of the Warburg Effect in Light of 15 Years of Research Experience: A Novel Evidence-Based View (An Expert Opinion Article). Onco Targets Ther. 2023;16:143-155.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Schobert I, Chapiro J, Pucar D, Saperstein L, Savic LJ. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET for Monitoring Response to Embolotherapy (Transarterial Chemoembolization) in Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors. PET Clin. 2019;14:437-445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Hwang SH, Hong HS, Kim D, Kim GM, Lee HW, Lee M, Kim DY, Park MA, Yun M. Total Lesion Glycolysis on 18F-FDG PET/CT Is a Better Prognostic Factor Than Tumor Dose on 90Y PET/CT in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With 90Y Transarterial Radioembolization. Clin Nucl Med. 2022;47:e437-e443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Karahan Şen NP, Alataş Ö, Gülcü A, Özdoğan Ö, Derebek E, Çapa Kaya G. The role of volumetric and textural analysis of pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computerized tomography images in predicting complete response to transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2022;43:807-814.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Moon CM, Shin SS, Heo SH, Jeong YY. Metabolic Alterations Associated with Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Their Correlation with Aging and Enzymatic Activity in Patients with Viral Hepatitis-Induced Liver Cirrhosis: A Preliminary Study. J Clin Med. 2020;9:765.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Jørgensen SH, Bøgh N, Hansen E, Væggemose M, Wiggers H, Laustsen C. Hyperpolarized MRI - An Update and Future Perspectives. Semin Nucl Med. 2022;52:374-381.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Bliemsrieder E, Kaissis G, Grashei M, Topping G, Altomonte J, Hundshammer C, Lohöfer F, Heid I, Keim D, Gebrekidan S, Trajkovic-Arsic M, Winkelkotte AM, Steiger K, Nawroth R, Siveke J, Schwaiger M, Makowski M, Schilling F, Braren R. Hyperpolarized (13)C pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopy for in vivo metabolic phenotyping of rat HCC. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1191.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Zhang Y, Zheng R, Liu M, Zhang X, Sun Y, Shen H, Chen S, Cai H, Guo W, Xie X, Liu B, Huang G. Quantitative Parameters of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Predicting the Response to Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Anti-angiogenesis Therapies for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024;50:352-357.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Xia Y, Jiang YX, Dai Q, Xiao Y, Lv K, Wang L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation of washout time and angiogenesis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;48:265-273.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Capriotti G, Piccardo A, Giovannelli E, Signore A. Targeting Copper in Cancer Imaging and Therapy: A New Theragnostic Agent. J Clin Med. 2022;12:223.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Song Q, Guo Y, Yao X, Rao S, Qian C, Ye D, Zeng M. Comparative study of evaluating the microcirculatory function status of primary small HCC between the CE (DCE-MRI) and Non-CE (IVIM-DWI) MR Perfusion Imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:2575-2583.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Chen Y, Qin X, Long L, Zhang L, Huang Z, Jiang Z, Li C. Diagnostic Value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI for the Expression of Ki67 and Microvascular Density in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51:1755-1763.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Chen J, Chen C, Xia C, Huang Z, Zuo P, Stemmer A, Song B. Quantitative free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid: correlations with Ki67 proliferation status, histological grades, and microvascular density. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43:1393-1403.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  29 Huang M, Zhang F, Li Z, Luo Y, Li J, Wang Z, Ma L, Chen G, Hu X. Fat fraction quantification with MRI estimates tumor proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1367907.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Yang C, Wei XQ, Zheng J, Tao YY, Gong XQ, Li L, Li ZM, Yang L, Mao Q, Zhou MT, Zhang XM. A correlative study between IVIM-DWI parameters and VEGF and MMPs expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13:1887-1898.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Fan T, Li S, Li K, Xu J, Zhao S, Li J, Zhou X, Jiang H. A Potential Prognostic Marker for Recognizing VEGF-Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Magnetic Resonance Radiomics Signature. Front Oncol. 2022;12:857715.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Yang C, Zhang ZM, Zhao ZP, Wang ZQ, Zheng J, Xiao HJ, Xu H, Liu H, Yang L. Radiomic analysis based on magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of VEGF expression in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024;49:3824-3833.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Liang H, Hu C, Lu J, Zhang T, Jiang J, Ding D, Du S, Duan S. Correlation of radiomic features on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance with microvessel density in hepatocellular carcinoma based on different models. J Int Med Res. 2021;49:300060521997586.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Zheng J, Du PZ, Yang C, Tao YY, Li L, Li ZM, Yang L. DCE-MRI-based radiomics in predicting angiopoietin-2 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48:3343-3352.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Vaupel P, Höckel M, Mayer A. Detection and characterization of tumor hypoxia using pO2 histography. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9:1221-1235.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 498]  [Cited by in RCA: 545]  [Article Influence: 30.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Savic LJ, Schobert IT, Peters D, Walsh JJ, Laage-Gaupp FM, Hamm CA, Tritz N, Doemel LA, Lin M, Sinusas A, Schlachter T, Duncan JS, Hyder F, Coman D, Chapiro J. Molecular Imaging of Extracellular Tumor pH to Reveal Effects of Locoregional Therapy on Liver Cancer Microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:428-438.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Pogarell T, Heiss R, Janka R, Nagel AM, Uder M, Roemer FW. Modern low-field MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2024;53:1751-1760.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Coman D, Peters DC, Walsh JJ, Savic LJ, Huber S, Sinusas AJ, Lin M, Chapiro J, Constable RT, Rothman DL, Duncan JS, Hyder F. Extracellular pH mapping of liver cancer on a clinical 3T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med. 2020;83:1553-1564.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Oura K, Morishita A, Tani J, Masaki T. Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5801.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 239]  [Article Influence: 59.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Aghighi M, Theruvath AJ, Pareek A, Pisani LL, Alford R, Muehe AM, Sethi TK, Holdsworth SJ, Hazard FK, Gratzinger D, Luna-Fineman S, Advani R, Spunt SL, Daldrup-Link HE. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor-Associated Macrophages: Clinical Translation. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:4110-4118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in RCA: 62]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Movahedi K, Schoonooghe S, Laoui D, Houbracken I, Waelput W, Breckpot K, Bouwens L, Lahoutte T, De Baetselier P, Raes G, Devoogdt N, Van Ginderachter JA. Nanobody-based targeting of the macrophage mannose receptor for effective in vivo imaging of tumor-associated macrophages. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4165-4177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 209]  [Cited by in RCA: 226]  [Article Influence: 17.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Jiang C, Cai H, Peng X, Zhang P, Wu X, Tian R. Targeted Imaging of Tumor-Associated Macrophages by Cyanine 7-Labeled Mannose in Xenograft Tumors. Mol Imaging. 2017;16:1536012116689499.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Zheng J, Bu X, Wei X, Ma X, Zhao P. The role of FoxM1 in immune cells. Clin Exp Med. 2023;23:1973-1979.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Chen X, Tang Y, Wu D, Li R, Lin Z, Zhou X, Wang H, Zhai H, Xu J, Shi X, Zhang G. From imaging to clinical outcome: dual-region CT radiomics predicting FOXM1 expression and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1278467.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Wu J, Liu W, Qiu X, Li J, Song K, Shen S, Huo L, Chen L, Xu M, Wang H, Jia N, Chen L. A Noninvasive Approach to Evaluate Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Predict Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Phenomics. 2023;3:549-564.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Varghese B, Cen S, Zahoor H, Siddiqui I, Aron M, Sali A, Rhie S, Lei X, Rivas M, Liu D, Hwang D, Quinn D, Desai M, Vaishampayan U, Gill I, Duddalwar V. Feasibility of using CT radiomic signatures for predicting CD8-T cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression in renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Radiol Open. 2022;9:100440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Chen S, Feng S, Wei J, Liu F, Li B, Li X, Hou Y, Gu D, Tang M, Xiao H, Jia Y, Peng S, Tian J, Kuang M. Pretreatment prediction of immunoscore in hepatocellular cancer: a radiomics-based clinical model based on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI imaging. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:4177-4187.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in RCA: 115]  [Article Influence: 19.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]