Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2024; 30(43): 4669-4671
Published online Nov 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i43.4669
Advances in artificial intelligence for predicting complication risks post-laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A significant leap forward
Hong-Niu Wang, Jia-Hao An, Department of Graduate School of Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China
Liang Zong, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzhi People’s Hospital, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China
ORCID number: Hong-Niu Wang (0000-0003-2572-4868); Jia-Hao An (0009-0006-3018-4295); Liang Zong (0000-0003-4139-4571).
Author contributions: Wang HN and An JH drafted the initial manuscript; Zong L reviewed the manuscript; All three authors contributed to the work.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Liang Zong, PhD, Doctor, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzhi People’s Hospital, No. 502 Changxing Middle Road, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China. 250537471@qq.com
Received: August 3, 2024
Revised: September 25, 2024
Accepted: October 18, 2024
Published online: November 21, 2024
Processing time: 89 Days and 0.7 Hours

Abstract

In a recent paper, Hong et al developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven predictive scoring system for potential complications following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. They demonstrated that integrating AI with random forest models significantly improved the preoperative prediction and patient outcome management accuracy. By incorporating data from multiple centers, their model ensures standardization, reliability, and broad applicability, distinguishing it from the prior models. The present study highlights AI's potential in clinical decision support, aiding in the preoperative and postoperative management of gastric cancer patients. Our findings may pave the way for future prospective studies to further enhance AI-supported diagnoses in clinical practice.

Key Words: Artificial intelligence; Gastric cancer; Gastrectomy; Random forest model; Complication

Core Tip: Hong et al developed a predictive scoring system that uses machine learning techniques including LASSO regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks to assess complications following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Their model, which was validated using data from multiple centers, showed high diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, particularly with the random forest method. This innovative artificial intelligence-driven approach enhances surgical safety, reduces complication risks, and offers a valuable tool for both preoperative and postoperative decision-making, particularly for less-experienced gastroenterologists managing gastric cancer cases.



TO THE EDITOR

Hong et al[1] recently developed a predictive scoring system for complications following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer[1]. The model exhibited significant diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, thereby enhancing overall surgical safety and establishing a foundation for the expanded use of laparoscopic gastrectomy in the management of gastric cancer.

At present, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is the primary approach for treating early-stage gastric cancer[2,3]. Increasing evidence confirms the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic treatment for advanced gastric cancer[4-6], but the use of laparoscopic treatment for advanced gastric cancer remains limited. The potential complications of a laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer necessitate close monitoring and management by surgeons. Identifying high-risk patients helps select appropriate surgical methods and interventions, reducing complications and improving patient outcomes.

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) and its application in preoperative prediction for gastric cancer is a hot topic due to the significant predictive advantages provided by AI. It has been shown that AI-driven models, particularly those using random forest systems, improve the diagnostic accuracy. These models have provided predictive performance that is superior to that of humans, especially when dealing with discrete features, limited extracted values, and non-differentiable factors.

In the present study, we propose a model for the treatment of gastric cancer that is comprised of two parts: A laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and a laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). The model was developed using three machine learning techniques: LASSO regression, random forest, and artificial neural networks. To build training and validation datasets we included the cases of 998 and 398 patients, respectively. All three methods showed good predictive performance for both LDG and LTG, with the random forest model demonstrating a slight advantage. The random forest model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8853 (P < 0.0001) in the training set and 0.9025 (P < 0.0001) in the validation set for the LTG group. In the LDG group, the training set model achieved an AUC of 0.9226 (P < 0.0001), and the validation set had an AUC of 0.7869 (P < 0.0001).

Numerous models have been developed to predict complication risks in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery, including a complication scoring system created by Huang et al[7] at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and another developed by Ohkura et al[8] at Kyoto University Hospital. However, AI research in gastric cancer prediction models faces challenges due to the variability in the data's depth, size, form, and origin. Compared to the prior models, Hong et al's model demonstrated superior performance in predicting complication risks for laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery[1].

The strength of our present study lies in its inclusion of patient data from multiple medical centers, ensuring the standardization, reliability, and generalizability of the validation dataset, thus setting the model that we used apart from other models predicting complications in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

We believe this model can guide future research to better enhance AI-supported diagnoses in clinical practice for gastric cancer. It will aid in both preoperative and postoperative decision-making, especially benefiting young and inexperienced gastroenterologists.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to those researchers who provided study data.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade C, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Liu YX; Wang C S-Editor: Li L L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zheng XM

References
1.  Hong QQ, Yan S, Zhao YL, Fan L, Yang L, Zhang WB, Liu H, Lin HX, Zhang J, Ye ZJ, Shen X, Cai LS, Zhang GW, Zhu JM, Ji G, Chen JP, Wang W, Li ZR, Zhu JT, Li GX, You J. Machine learning identifies the risk of complications after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2024;30:79-90.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
2.  Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:699-708.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 222]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 253]  [Article Influence: 36.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Song KY, Ryu SY. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:627-633.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 241]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 263]  [Article Influence: 26.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Wang K, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Hu Y, Liu H, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J, Liu F, Li Z, Zhao G, Yang K, Liu C, Li H, Chen P, Ji J, Li G; Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1983-1992.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 351]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 463]  [Article Influence: 92.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
5.  Huang C, Liu H, Hu Y, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Wang K, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Yu J, Zheng C, Liu F, Li Z, Zhao G, Zhang J, Chen P, Li G; Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group. Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-Year Outcomes From the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2022;157:9-17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 104]  [Article Influence: 34.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1350-1357.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 428]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 491]  [Article Influence: 61.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Huang CM, Tu RH, Lin JX, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M. A scoring system to predict the risk of postoperative complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on a large-scale retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e812.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Ohkura Y, Shinohara H, Shindoh J, Haruta S, Ueno M, Sakai Y, Udagawa H. A New Scoring System Using Preoperative Factors and Contour Mapping for Predicting Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy. Dig Surg. 2016;33:74-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]