Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2024; 30(40): 4393-4398
Published online Oct 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i40.4393
Elafibranor: A promising treatment for alcoholic liver disease, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, and cholestatic liver disease
Hang Zhang, Xuan Dong, Lei Zhu, Fu-Shan Tang, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Basic Pharmacology of Guizhou Province and School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, Guizhou Province, China
Hang Zhang, Xuan Dong, Lei Zhu, Fu-Shan Tang, Key Laboratory of Basic Pharmacology of Ministry of Education and Joint International Research Laboratory of Ethnomedicine of Ministry of Education, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, Guizhou Province, China
Hang Zhang, Xuan Dong, Lei Zhu, Fu-Shan Tang, Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy in Zunyi City, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, Guizhou Province, China
ORCID number: Xuan Dong (0009-0004-6503-3716); Fu-Shan Tang (0000-0001-8779-1041).
Author contributions: Zhang H and Dong X contributed to the manuscript outline and composed the initial draft; Zhu L improved the manuscript outline and reviewed the paper; Tang FS originated the concept for this manuscript, provided supervision, reviewed the paper, and finalized the manuscript. All authors have approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors have nothing to disclose.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Fu-Shan Tang, PhD, Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Basic Pharmacology of Guizhou Province and School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, No. 6 Xuefu West Road, Xinpu New District, Zunyi 563006, Guizhou Province, China. fstang@vip.163.com
Received: August 1, 2024
Revised: September 15, 2024
Accepted: September 23, 2024
Published online: October 28, 2024
Processing time: 75 Days and 15.6 Hours

Abstract

Liver diseases pose a significant threat to human health. Although effective therapeutic agents exist for some liver diseases, there remains a critical need for advancements in research to address the gaps in treatment options and improve patient outcomes. This article reviews the assessment of Elafibranor's effects on liver fibrosis and intestinal barrier function in a mouse model of alcoholic liver disease (ALD), as reported by Koizumi et al in the World Journal of Gastroenterology. We summarize the impact and mechanisms of Elafibranor on ALD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, and cholestatic liver disease based on current research. We also explore its potential as a dual agonist of PPARα/δ, which is undergoing Phase III clinical trials for metabolic-associated steatohepatitis. Our goal is to stimulate further investigation into Elafibranor's use for preventing and treating these liver diseases and to provide insights for its clinical application.

Key Words: Elafibranor; Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor; Liver fibrosis; Alcoholic liver disease; Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease; Metabolic-associated steatohepatitis; Cholestatic liver disease; Primary biliary cholangitis; Liver diseases

Core Tip: This article provides a critical evaluation of the study by Koizumi et al on the effects of Elafibranor on liver fibrosis and gut barrier function in a mouse model of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). It reviews recent advancements in the use of Elafibranor for treating ALD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, and cholestatic liver disease, and explores its therapeutic potential. Additionally, it outlines future prospects for Elafibranor’s application. The aim is to promote broader use of Elafibranor in managing these liver conditions and to highlight its potential role in advancing clinical treatments.



TO THE EDITOR

The liver, as the largest solid organ in the human body, plays a critical role in various essential functions, including bile secretion, detoxification, immune responses to pathogens, and numerous physiological and metabolic processes[1]. Despite its importance, the liver is vulnerable to damage from factors such as alcohol consumption, drug abuse, overnutrition, and disruptions in the intestinal microbiota. These factors can lead to a range of liver diseases, including alcoholic liver disease (ALD), metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), cholestatic liver disease (CLD), and autoimmune liver disease. These conditions have the potential to progress to more severe outcomes such as cirrhosis and liver cancer[2-4]. Liver diseases considerably affect patients’ quality of life and lead to around 2 million deaths each year, making up about 4% of all fatalities[5]. Current treatment challenges include concerns over drug safety and efficacy, patient adherence, and the need for targeted therapies[6,7]. Effective treatment options are still limited, highlighting the significant potential in discovering safe and reliable drugs for managing these liver diseases.

Elafibranor, a dual agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/δ (PPARα/δ) developed by Genfit, was initially intended for managing hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes. Experimental studies suggest that it has potential protective effects on the liver. Currently, Elafibranor is under development for treating MAFLD and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), positioning it as one of the most promising candidates for treating MAFLD[8-10]. This article explores the prospective applications of Elafibranor in the treatment of a various of liver diseases, drawing from the latest research by Koizumi et al[11].

Evaluation of the study

Annually, over 2 billion people worldwide consume alcohol, with more than 75 million affected by ALD, making it a prevalent liver disorder[12]. ALD progresses through stages including hepatocyte steatosis, alcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, and in some cases, cirrhosis[13]. Without intervention, liver fibrosis often progresses to cirrhosis; typically, cirrhosis develops 10 to 20 years after initial fibrosis appears[14]. Cirrhosis is a leading cause of death among individuals with alcohol use disorders[15]. Current therapeutic approaches for ALD predominantly focus on alcohol abstinence. Regrettably, there are no specific pharmacological agents approved to treat ALD-induced liver fibrosis; patients are often managed with symptomatic medications[13]. For individuals with advanced alcoholic cirrhosis or those who do not respond to pharmacological treatment, liver transplantation remains a costly and highly risky option[16,17].

Koizumi et al[11] were pioneers in exploring the protective effects of Elafibranor on the intestinal barrier and hepatic fibrosis induced by ALD. Their research demonstrated that Elafibranor counteracts the reduction in PPARα expression and enhances the expression of PLA2 and COX-2 in hepatic tissue of ALD mice. This indicates that Elafibranor modulates PPARα-mediated lipid metabolism in the liver of ALD models. Further analysis revealed that Elafibranor significantly reduced liver steatosis, necrotic inflammation, and levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, triacylglycerol (TG), and free fatty acids (FAs). Histological examination confirmed these results. Additionally, Elafibranor elevated mRNA levels of markers related to FA oxidation and lipolysis, with no effect on lipid synthesis markers, suggesting that its role is primarily in fat degradation and oxidative metabolism. Elafibranor also influenced antioxidant markers (SOD1 and CAT) and autophagy-related proteins (LC3-II, Atg7, Beclin-1, and p62), thus mitigating hepatocyte apoptosis in the ALD model. Furthermore, Elafibranor effectively inhibited liver fibrosis progression by decreasing α-SMA myofibroblasts, hydroxyproline levels, and matrix metalloproteinase activity, while downregulating fibrosis-associated genes (Acta2, Col1a1, and Tgfb1).

The authors investigated the protective mechanisms of Elafibranor using HepG2 and LX-2 cells and found that Elafibranor primarily activates PPARα. This action reduces hepatocyte apoptosis and lipid accumulation while enhancing autophagy and antioxidant defenses. Elafibranor inhibits hepatic inflammation by blocking macrophage activation through the LPS/TLR4 signaling pathway, thereby preventing NF-κB activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. It also boosts tight junction protein expression, preventing intestinal glucan leakage into the portal vein in ALD mouse models. Additionally, Elafibranor reduces intestinal apoptosis due to autophagy dysfunction and shifts macrophage polarization from M1 to M2 types, improving intestinal permeability. By activating PPARδ, Elafibranor restores intestinal epithelial barrier integrity and tight junction protein expression in ethanol-exposed human intestinal cells, while enhancing autophagy-mediated apoptosis. In summary, Elafibranor mitigates hepatic steatosis, apoptosis, fibrosis, and inflammation in ALD models; promotes lipid metabolism, hepatocyte autophagy, and antioxidant capacity through PPARα activation; and protects the intestinal barrier, enhances autophagy, and reduces inflammation via PPARδ activation.

The study comprehensively investigated autophagy, oxidative stress, liver pathology, and cell death in a mouse model of ALD, providing a robust experimental basis for understanding Elafibranor's therapeutic potential in ALD. The results underscore Elafibranor as a potent inhibitor of fatty liver, inflammation, and fibrosis in these mice, suggesting a promising therapeutic strategy for ALD. Moreover, the study highlights Elafibranor's activation of PPARδ to enhance intestinal barrier function, opening new avenues for exploring the etiology and management of ALD.

Nevertheless, several challenges remain. Although mouse models are frequently utilized to study ALD, they do not fully replicate human ALD, necessitating additional validation to confirm the applicability of these findings to human conditions. Furthermore, further research is required to establish the safety and efficacy of Elafibranor in clinical settings, despite its pronounced preventive effects observed in ALD mouse models. While this study has highlighted Elafibranor's influence on intestinal barrier function, a more detailed investigation is needed to elucidate its underlying molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways. Additionally, since the current study utilized a pretreatment approach in the ALD model, future research should assess whether Elafibranor retains its therapeutic efficacy when administered following the onset of ALD.

Although Elafibranor has shown favorable safety profiles in phase I and phase II studies and is currently undergoing phase III clinical trials for metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) treatment, existing data does not yet support its efficacy in treating liver fibrosis caused by MAFLD[9]. Excessive ethanol consumption can lead to ALD through both direct effects on the liver and indirect effects mediated via the gut. Alcohol abuse exacerbates hepatic fat accumulation, inflammation, and oxidative stress, while also disrupting intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota composition[18]. Further investigation is required to elucidate the specific mechanisms by which Elafibranor may influence liver fibrosis in the contexts of ALD and MAFLD, given their distinct etiologies[13]. Despite these challenges, Elafibranor shows promise for the treatment of liver fibrosis, as evidenced by its amelioration of fibrotic outcomes in an ALD model in this study.

Research progress of Elafibranor in liver diseases

Elafibranor in ALD: Li et al's study investigated the effects of Elafibranor on autophagy dysfunction in a mouse model of ALD[19]. They found that prolonged ethanol consumption led to reduced levels of PPARα and PPARδ, as well as decreased autophagy in the liver, intestine, and adipose tissue of mice. This reduction contributed to intestinal barrier disruption and the development of alcoholic steatohepatitis. However, long-term administration of Elafibranor significantly attenuated hepatic damage and intestinal barrier disruption, while restoring PPARα and PPARδ levels. This restoration was associated with improvements in autophagy dysfunction, apoptosis, inflammation, and lipid homeostasis.

These results suggest that Elafibranor regulates immune function, hepatic lipid metabolism, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant pathways, and autophagy and apoptosis mechanisms to mitigate ALD. Despite these promising findings, research on Elafibranor's efficacy in ALD is still limited, indicating a need for further studies to address existing gaps in the field.

Elafibranor in MAFLD: Recent research has led to the reclassification of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to MAFLD, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is now termed MASH to better align with the current understanding of these conditions[4,20]. In severe cases, MAFLD can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even liver cancer, characterized by excessive fat accumulation in the liver, impaired liver function, and metabolic abnormalities[7,21]. Tølbøl et al[22] investigated the effects of Elafibranor in a choline-deficient L-amino acid-defined diet-induced MASH rat model. They found that Elafibranor intervention increased the expression of peroxisomal enzymes (ACOX1 and EHHADH) and significantly reduced the steatohepatitis score. While Elafibranor did not alleviate liver fibrosis histopathologically, it did decrease the expression of hydroxyproline and the fibrotrophic-related gene Col1a1.

In their study on late-stage MAFLD fibrosis in a mouse model, Perakakis et al[23] found that Elafibranor improved body weight, insulin sensitivity, and glucose homeostasis. It reduced levels of TG, diacylglycerol, and monoacylglycerol, promoted FA β-oxidation, and increased the phosphatidylcholine/phosphatidylethanolamine ratio, thereby enhancing lipid metabolism. Furthermore, Elafibranor stimulated methionine and glutathione metabolism, decreased linoleic acid ester-related metabolites (such as hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid and dihydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid), increased eicosapentaenoic acid levels, and reduced arachidonic acid metabolites (including prostaglandin 2α and 6-keto-prostaglandin 1α). These effects contributed to the regulation of oxidative stress and inflammation.

Hakeem et al's study on Elafibranor's effects on MASH and colitis found that it inhibits the breakdown of the intestinal barrier and prevents macrophages from polarizing to the M1 type[24]. By disrupting the expression of intestinal compact junction proteins, Elafibranor reduces interferon-γ and inducible nitric oxide synthase production by M1 macrophages, which exacerbates inflammation. Additionally, Elafibranor enhances IL10/STAT3 signaling to promote M2-type macrophage polarization, aiding in anti-inflammatory responses and barrier repair. It also prevents TLR4/NF-κB activation in the liver, mitigating further liver damage following intestinal barrier collapse.

In their study on MASH models, Boeckmans et al[25] found that Elafibranor improves autophagy dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress, alleviating MASH characteristics in vitro. Elafibranor also enhances lipid metabolism by downregulating liver X receptors and genes involved in very long-chain FA and fat synthesis, promoting FA β-oxidation. Moreover, Elafibranor prevents immune cell aggregation in vivo by upregulating inflammatory chemokines mediated by NF-κB, including CCL2, CCL7, CCL8, CXCL5, CXCL8, IL-1a, and IL-11.

In addition, Zhang et al[26] demonstrated that Elafibranor reduces steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in the liver of MASH mice. They proposed a regulatory mechanism where PPARδ activation decreases the E3 ubiquitin ligase ankyrin repeat and suppressor of cytokine signaling box-containing 2 protein (ASB2), leading to increased expression of S100 calcium-binding protein A4 (S100A4), which may promote fibrosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Collectively, these findings suggest that Elafibranor may ameliorate MAFLD through multiple mechanisms, including its anti-inflammatory effects, modulation of pro-fibrotic gene expression, enhancement of lipid and glucose metabolism, reduction of oxidative stress, regulation of immune responses, and correction of autophagy dysfunction.

Elafibranor in CLD: PBC is a chronic liver disease that, if untreated, can progress to cirrhosis, liver fibrosis, and cholestasis[27]. Elafibranor has demonstrated anti-cholestatic and anti-inflammatory properties in phase II trials involving PBC patients[28]. Significant reductions in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels, markers of PBC, and secondary inflammation indicators (IgM, γ-glutamyl transferase, 5'-nucleotidase, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) were observed. Importantly, Elafibranor did not worsen the pruritus commonly associated with PBC and was generally well tolerated. Recent phase III clinical trials further confirmed that Elafibranor rapidly and sustainably reduces ALP levels and improves dyslipidemia, including triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol[10].

Indeed, patients on Elafibranor therapy experienced a reduction in moderate-to-severe itching symptoms compared to those receiving other PBC therapies. This highlights Elafibranor's significant role in addressing PBC through its anti-inflammatory, anti-cholestatic, and lipid-metabolizing properties.

Future outlook

PPARα is predominantly expressed in the human liver, while PPARδ is found throughout all human tissues[29]. These receptors play crucial roles in metabolic processes such as inflammation, glucose balance, and lipid metabolism. Research indicates that Elafibranor can enhance high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, reduce lipids and triglycerides, and activate PPARα, thereby promoting β-oxidative metabolism of FAs. Elafibranor also exhibits anti-inflammatory effects by reducing inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharides and cytokines[30]. Additionally, Elafibranor improves blood lipid profiles, increases HDL cholesterol levels, enhances insulin sensitivity, stimulates FA metabolism, and regulates hepatic and peripheral tissue metabolism through activation of PPARδ[8]. Importantly, Elafibranor does not induce the adverse effects associated with PPARγ receptor activation nor does it directly activate PPARγ receptors[31]. However, variations exist in the effects of PPARα and PPARδ activation across different tissues. Some studies suggest that PPARα activity impacts gut-related functions[32], while others indicate that PPARδ activation may influence liver-related functions[26], possibly due to variations in disease models used. Further research is necessary to fully elucidate these underlying mechanisms.

The gut-liver axis is vital for maintaining intestinal barrier integrity, liver function, and systemic inflammation[33]. Restoring this axis to its normal state is essential for improving intestinal and liver diseases. Normal function of the gut-liver axis depends on the integrity of the intestinal barrier, liver function, and the balance of intestinal flora. Disruption of any of these factors due to liver diseases can impair the normal function of the gut-liver axis[34]. Various liver diseases, including hepatic encephalopathy and chronic liver diseases, can arise from disruptions to the intestinal barrier[35,36]. The integrity of the intestinal barrier is heavily influenced by the gut microbiota. Disturbances in the structure and metabolism of intestinal flora can lead to degradation of the intestinal barrier and provoke an abnormal immune response[37]. With the rapid advancement of microbial 16S rRNA sequencing[38], exploring Elafibranor in the context of intestinal flora and intestinal homeostasis may shed light on its potential in managing liver diseases. Preliminary studies suggest that Elafibranor might positively impact liver diseases by modulating gut-related processes. Future research could further elucidate Elafibranor’s protective mechanisms in the gut, potentially revealing new therapeutic avenues for managing ALD, MAFLD, and CLD.

Elafibranor's potential for treating ALD, MAFLD, and CLD arises from its multi-target mechanism of action, which addresses various pathways involved in liver pathology. Its therapeutic efficacy may be further enhanced when used in combination with other therapeutic agents. Roth et al[39] found that combining Elafibranor with obeticholic acid in a mouse model of MASH improved therapeutic outcomes, suggesting that their complementary molecular mechanisms could synergistically target MASH. Similarly, Perakakis et al[23] highlighted the distinct but complementary anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic mechanisms of Elafibranor and liraglutide in MASH. Tølbøl et al[40] further explored the therapeutic effects of Elafibranor, obeticholic acid, and liraglutide in diet-induced obese mouse models of MASH, noting the unique anti-MASH properties of each. In the context of PBC, Lin et al[41] conducted a network meta-analysis which showed that PPAR agonists, including Elafibranor, improved biochemical outcomes such as ALP levels, especially when combined with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). This suggests a potential benefit of combining Elafibranor with UDCA. Future research is necessary to fully assess the safety and efficacy of combining Elafibranor with other medications for liver diseases, as current studies mainly focus on treatment effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Most of the existing data on Elafibranor come from preclinical studies and animal models, with a significant gap in human clinical trials. These studies indicate that Elafibranor demonstrates considerable potential in preventing and treating ALD, MAFLD, and CLD through various mechanisms, highlighting its significant therapeutic promise for these liver diseases. Elafibranor's multi-target action necessitates further validation of its safety in human trials. While the potential for reduced side effects exists, comprehensive evaluation through extensive clinical trials is required to fully assess its safety profile and the impact of potential combination therapies.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade C

P-Reviewer: Ng NBH S-Editor: Qu XL L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Chen YX

References
1.  He S, Yi Y, Hou D, Fu X, Zhang J, Ru X, Xie J, Wang J. Identification of hepatoprotective traditional Chinese medicines based on the structure-activity relationship, molecular network, and machine learning techniques. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:969979.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Li L, Dong Y, Liu X, Wang M. Mangiferin for the Management of Liver Diseases: A Review. Foods. 2023;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Wang Y, Liu K. Therapeutic potential of oleanolic acid in liver diseases. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024;397:4537-4554.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Li Z, Ouyang H, Zhu J. Traditional Chinese medicines and natural products targeting immune cells in the treatment of metabolic-related fatty liver disease. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1195146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Devarbhavi H, Asrani SK, Arab JP, Nartey YA, Pose E, Kamath PS. Global burden of liver disease: 2023 update. J Hepatol. 2023;79:516-537.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 434]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
6.  Kimbell B, Boyd K, Kendall M, Iredale J, Murray SA. Managing uncertainty in advanced liver disease: a qualitative, multiperspective, serial interview study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 92]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Wu JH, OuYang LQ, Ou YT, Deng GM. [Research progress on mechanism of Zhizi (Gardeniae Fructus) in treating liver diseases]. Hunan Zhongyiyao Daxue Xuebao. 2024;44:1346-1350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Xie F, Song B, Zhou XB. [A new drug for treatment of NASH-Elafibranor]. Linchuang Yaowu Zhiliao Zazhi. 2018;16:1-4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Westerouen Van Meeteren MJ, Drenth JPH, Tjwa ETTL. Elafibranor: a potential drug for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2020;29:117-123.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kowdley KV, Bowlus CL, Levy C, Akarca US, Alvares-da-Silva MR, Andreone P, Arrese M, Corpechot C, Francque SM, Heneghan MA, Invernizzi P, Jones D, Kruger FC, Lawitz E, Mayo MJ, Shiffman ML, Swain MG, Valera JM, Vargas V, Vierling JM, Villamil A, Addy C, Dietrich J, Germain JM, Mazain S, Rafailovic D, Taddé B, Miller B, Shu J, Zein CO, Schattenberg JM; ELATIVE Study Investigators’ Group;  ELATIVE Study Investigators' Group. Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor in Primary Biliary Cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:795-805.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 37.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Koizumi A, Kaji K, Nishimura N, Asada S, Matsuda T, Tanaka M, Yorioka N, Tsuji Y, Kitagawa K, Sato S, Namisaki T, Akahane T, Yoshiji H. Effects of elafibranor on liver fibrosis and gut barrier function in a mouse model of alcohol-associated liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2024;30:3428-3446.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
12.  Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70:151-171.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1382]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2006]  [Article Influence: 401.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Seitz HK, Neuman MG. The History of Alcoholic Liver Disease: From an Unrecognized Disease to One of the Most Frequent Diseases in Hepatology. J Clin Med. 2021;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Cubero FJ, Urtasun R, Nieto N. Alcohol and liver fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2009;29:211-221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Bajaj JS. Alcohol, liver disease and the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:235-246.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 256]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 413]  [Article Influence: 82.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Singal AK, Bataller R, Ahn J, Kamath PS, Shah VH. ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcoholic Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:175-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 446]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 509]  [Article Influence: 84.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Yanny B, Boutros S, Saleh F, Saab S. Liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis: update. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2020;36:157-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Wang ZL, Tao L, Yang M, Wang YL, Wang R, Tian Y. [Research Progress on the Intervention of Food-borne Polyphenols in Alcoholic Liver Disease]. Zhongguo Shipin Xuebao. 2024;24:479-491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Li TH, Yang YY, Huang CC, Liu CW, Tsai HC, Lin MW, Tsai CY, Huang SF, Wang YW, Lee TY, Huang YH, Hou MC, Lin HC. Elafibranor interrupts adipose dysfunction-mediated gut and liver injury in mice with alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019;133:531-544.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J; International Consensus Panel. MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1999-2014.e1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1188]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1901]  [Article Influence: 475.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
21.  Chen G, Fan L, Yang T, Xu T, Wang Z, Wang Y, Kong L, Sun X, Chen K, Xie Q, Zhao H. Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced liver fibrosis in US adults: Evidence from NHANES 2017-2020. Heliyon. 2024;10:e25660.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Tølbøl KS, Stierstorfer B, Rippmann JF, Veidal SS, Rigbolt KTG, Schönberger T, Gillum MP, Hansen HH, Vrang N, Jelsing J, Feigh M, Broermann A. Disease Progression and Pharmacological Intervention in a Nutrient-Deficient Rat Model of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:1238-1256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Perakakis N, Stefanakis K, Feigh M, Veidal SS, Mantzoros CS. Elafibranor and liraglutide improve differentially liver health and metabolism in a mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2021;41:1853-1866.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Hakeem AN, Kamal MM, Tawfiq RA, Abdelrahman BA, Hammam OA, Elmazar MM, El-Khatib AS, Attia YM. Elafibranor modulates ileal macrophage polarization to restore intestinal integrity in NASH: Potential crosstalk between ileal IL-10/STAT3 and hepatic TLR4/NF-κB axes. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;157:114050.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Boeckmans J, Buyl K, Natale A, Vandenbempt V, Branson S, De Boe V, Rogiers V, De Kock J, Rodrigues RM, Vanhaecke T. Elafibranor restricts lipogenic and inflammatory responses in a human skin stem cell-derived model of NASH. Pharmacol Res. 2019;144:377-389.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Zhang M, Barroso E, Ruart M, Peña L, Peyman M, Aguilar-Recarte D, Montori-Grau M, Rada P, Cugat C, Montironi C, Zarei M, Jurado-Aguilar J, Camins A, Balsinde J, Valverde ÁM, Wahli W, Palomer X, Vázquez-Carrera M. Elafibranor upregulates the EMT-inducer S100A4 via PPARβ/δ. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;167:115623.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2017;67:145-172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 950]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 801]  [Article Influence: 114.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Schattenberg JM, Pares A, Kowdley KV, Heneghan MA, Caldwell S, Pratt D, Bonder A, Hirschfield GM, Levy C, Vierling J, Jones D, Tailleux A, Staels B, Megnien S, Hanf R, Magrez D, Birman P, Luketic V. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of elafibranor in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and incomplete response to UDCA. J Hepatol. 2021;74:1344-1354.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77]  [Article Influence: 25.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Botta M, Audano M, Sahebkar A, Sirtori CR, Mitro N, Ruscica M. PPAR Agonists and Metabolic Syndrome: An Established Role? Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 160]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 171]  [Article Influence: 28.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Pawlak M, Lefebvre P, Staels B. Molecular mechanism of PPARα action and its impact on lipid metabolism, inflammation and fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2015;62:720-733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 793]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1019]  [Article Influence: 113.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Boeckmans J, Natale A, Rombaut M, Buyl K, Rogiers V, De Kock J, Vanhaecke T, M Rodrigues R. Anti-NASH Drug Development Hitches a Lift on PPAR Agonism. Cells. 2019;9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 18.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Basso PJ, Sales-Campos H, Nardini V, Duarte-Silva M, Alves VBF, Bonfá G, Rodrigues CC, Ghirotto B, Chica JEL, Nomizo A, Cardoso CRB. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Mediates the Beneficial Effects of Atorvastatin in Experimental Colitis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:618365.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Albillos A, de Gottardi A, Rescigno M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: Pathophysiological basis for therapy. J Hepatol. 2020;72:558-577.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 542]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1041]  [Article Influence: 260.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
34.  Chen YS, Zhang Q, Liu YN. [Role of gut microbiome in alcohol-associated liver disease based on molecular mechanisms and biomarkers]. Zhongguo Weishengtaixue Zazhi. 2024;36:608-611.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Liu YH, Shen TT, Zhang Q, Yuan FY. Relationship between intestinal barrier function and liver disease. Ganzang. 2019;24:583-585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Li R, Li XS, Gui CS, Ren ML, Wang JY. Research progress of the relationship between intestinal barrier function and disease occurrence. Zhongguo Dangdai Yiyao. 2018;23:37-41.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Ji YK, Ni RF, Liang YL, Chen GS, Huang ZQ, Liu G. Effect of Mankuining Formula on NLRP3/Caspase-1/GSDMD Pyroptosis Pathway and Gut Microbiota in DSS-induced Ulcerative Colitis Mice. Zhongguo Shiyan Fangjixue Zazhi. 2023;29:68-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Wang S, Wu J, Ran D, Ou G, Chen Y, Xu H, Deng L, Chen X. Study of the Relationship between Mucosal Immunity and Commensal Microbiota: A Bibliometric Analysis. Nutrients. 2023;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Roth JD, Veidal SS, Fensholdt LKD, Rigbolt KTG, Papazyan R, Nielsen JC, Feigh M, Vrang N, Young M, Jelsing J, Adorini L, Hansen HH. Combined obeticholic acid and elafibranor treatment promotes additive liver histological improvements in a diet-induced ob/ob mouse model of biopsy-confirmed NASH. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9046.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Tølbøl KS, Kristiansen MN, Hansen HH, Veidal SS, Rigbolt KT, Gillum MP, Jelsing J, Vrang N, Feigh M. Metabolic and hepatic effects of liraglutide, obeticholic acid and elafibranor in diet-induced obese mouse models of biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:179-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 105]  [Article Influence: 17.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Lin W, Wang JX, Liu YJ. Optimal drug regimens for improving ALP biochemical levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis refractory to UDCA: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2024;13:46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]