Published online Aug 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i29.3461
Revised: May 16, 2024
Accepted: July 10, 2024
Published online: August 7, 2024
Processing time: 140 Days and 19.6 Hours
Achalasia can significantly impair the quality of life. The clinical presentation typically includes dysphagia to both solids and liquids, chest pain, and regur
Core Tip: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a valuable treatment for achalasia, although the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following this procedure is a major concern among patients and caregivers. In this editorial, we will address the true meaning of acidic reflux after POEM, discuss the factors that need to be taken into account to prevent post-POEM GERD, and outline the treatment options available when it occurs.
- Citation: Itskoviz D, Malnick SDH. Gastroesophageal reflux following peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: Bumps in the road to success. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(29): 3461-3464
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i29/3461.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i29.3461
Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder, with a reported incidence of approximately 1 per 100000 persons per year. The clinical presentation typically includes dysphagia to both solids and liquids, chest pain, and regurgitation. Diagnosis may also be delayed or mistaken as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) owing to atypical presentations or overlapping symptoms.
The etiology of achalasia is still unknown, but the pathophysiology is characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation with concomitant peristalsis dysfunction in the esophageal smooth muscles. The diagnosis involves careful consideration of the clinical scenario, together with the results of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, contrast esophagogram, and high-resolution manometry (HRM). The gold standard for diagnosing achalasia is HRM, as it allows an objective and reproducible measurement of dynamic esophageal pressure over time and space. This technique also enables the subcategorization of patients with achalasia into different subtypes according to the Chicago Classification 4.0.
Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP or endoFLIP) is a high-resolution impedance system that measures esophageal distensibility and has a good correlation with HRM. FLIP is performed during sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy. It has the advantage of aiding diagnosis in patients intolerant of HRM and providing immediate feedback on the effectiveness of treatment.
Treatment goals for achalasia center on the main pathophysiological issue: impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Pharmacological treatment options have proven to be ineffective, except for endoscopic botulinum toxin injections at the lower esophageal sphincter, which have only short-lived effectiveness. The classic treatment for achalasia has been either pneumatic dilatation of the esophagus or Heller myotomy performed surgically, usually with conco
In 2010, Inoue and Kudo[5] published their experience with 43 achalasia patients treated with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Since then, this approach has gained popularity as a treatment modality for achalasia patients. POEM is performed under endoscopic guidance by creating a submucosal tunnel in the esophagus and stomach cardia and selectively dissecting the muscle fibers in that tunnel. While POEM is considered an effective and safe procedure, the development of post-POEM GERD remains a challenge. In surgical myotomy, the anti-reflux mechanism is partially restored by creating a fundoplication, but this is not the case in the classical POEM procedure.
Nabi et al[1] have comprehensively reviewed the clinical significance and approach to post-POEM GERD. The first question addressed is how to define post-POEM GERD. Should we rely on patient-reported symptoms, objectively look for esophagitis and measure esophageal exposure to acid, or perhaps combine all of the above outcomes?
A significant number of post-POEM patients show evidence of esophageal acid exposure, but most remain asymptomatic. Moreover, even in patients with proven esophageal acid exposure, the incidence of severe esophagitis is relatively low[6,7]. Dewitt et al[8] recently described a cohort of 149 patients who underwent POEM and were followed up after at least 6 months with pH-metry. They found that a positive reflux symptom association was as low as 17.1%-20.9% in symptomatic patients. Karyampudi et al[9] compared 50 patients with post-POEM GERD to those with non-achalasia-related GERD and found a positive reflux symptom association in only 6% of post-POEM GERD patients compared to 56% in the control group. It is also important to note that the documentation of an acidic environment in the post-POEM esophagus can be related to acidic fermentation secondary to motility disturbances and food stasis and not to actual acid reflux from the stomach. The incidence of actual acid reflux is significantly less evident when we examine the acid exposure pattern in these patients[10,11].
The second question that arises is regarding the clinical significance of post-POEM GERD besides the patients’ symptoms. Given that POEM is a relatively new procedure, the available data are limited, and yet, it appears that the development of GERD-related complications, such as Barrett’s esophagus and peptic strictures, is infrequent. It is estimated that even these uncommon complications can be avoided with readily available drugs such as proton pump inhibitors and, possibly, potassium-competitive acid blockers[6,12].
Shiwaku et al[13] found a 7.5% incidence of severe reflux esophagitis in a cohort of 2905 patients who underwent POEM. They found an association between the development of severe reflux esophagitis and older age (> 65 years), previous achalasia treatments, an Eckardt score ≥ 7, sigmoid-type achalasia, and long (> 10 cm) myotomy. Another retrospective study involving 183 post-POEM patients reported an incidence of severe GERD in 19.5% of patients[14]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies, including 2342 post-POEM patients with a median follow-up of 48 months, reported only 3 cases of significant reflux-related consequences, such as Barrett’s esophagus and peptic stricture[15].
The third question is whether we can predict which patients are prone to develop post-POEM GERD, and, if so, whether we can offer them any preventive measures. Nabi et al[1] address several risk factors in their review, such as obesity, female sex, and the presence of a hiatal hernia. In addition, they discuss several technical aspects of the procedure that might mitigate the risk of post-POEM GERD, such as limiting the length of the gastric myotomy, preserving the sling fibers during myotomy, and even combining the creation of a gastric fundoplication during the POEM procedure via the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery approach, which appears to be safe and effective in experienced hands, although its generalizability is yet to be determined[16-18].
The fourth and last question is how easily we can treat patients with post-POEM GERD. It appears that the primary treatment regimen is similar to that for any other GERD patients, involving proton pump inhibitors. This well-known class of drugs seems to work well in post-POEM GERD patients. Other more instrumental methods to treat GERD are also effective and available. A recent review of eight studies including 3568 patients found that treatment using proton pump inhibitors is effective and leads to complete resolution of symptoms in most post-POEM patients dealing with GERD[19].
POEM is an effective treatment for achalasia patients, but GERD remains an important side effect of this procedure. Defining the true incidence and impact of GERD in post-POEM patients can be challenging. However, by identifying specific risk factors in our patients and refining the POEM procedure accordingly, we can make the road to success in treating achalasia a little smoother.
1. | Nabi Z, Inavolu P, Duvvuru NR. Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update. World J Gastroenterol. 2024;30:1096-1107. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
2. | Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1393-1411. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 106] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 194] [Article Influence: 48.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Khashab MA, Vela MF, Thosani N, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Fishman DS, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Kannadath BS, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Qumseya BJ, Sawhney MS, Yang J, Wani S. ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:213-227.e6. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 104] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107] [Article Influence: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Oude Nijhuis RAB, Zaninotto G, Roman S, Boeckxstaens GE, Fockens P, Langendam MW, Plumb AA, Smout A, Targarona EM, Trukhmanov AS, Weusten B, Bredenoord AJ. European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020;8:13-33. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 67] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 93] [Article Influence: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Inoue H, Kudo SE. [Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for 43 consecutive cases of esophageal achalasia]. Nihon Rinsho. 2010;68:1749-1752. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
6. | Modayil RJ, Zhang X, Rothberg B, Kollarus M, Galibov I, Peller H, Taylor S, Brathwaite CE, Halwan B, Grendell JH, Stavropoulos SN. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: 10-year outcomes from a large, single-center U.S. series with high follow-up completion and comprehensive analysis of long-term efficacy, safety, objective GERD, and endoscopic functional luminal assessment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;94:930-942. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48] [Article Influence: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Abu-Nuwar MR, Eriksson S, Zheng P, Jobe B, Ayazi S. Gastroesophageal Reflux after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: An Assessment of Incidence and Predisposing Factor. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;235:S22-S22. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
8. | DeWitt JM, Kessler WR, Wo JM, Stainko S, Perkins A, Dickason D, Al-Haddad MA, Siwiec R. Symptom Association for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease by pH Monitoring After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117:1316-1319. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Karyampudi A, Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Darisetty S, Goud R, Chavan R, Kalapala R, Rao GV, Reddy DN. Gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case-control study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021;9:63-71. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Ramchandani M, Pal P, Singla N, Reddy DN. Post-per-oral endoscopic myotomy heartburn: It's not always reflux: Expert review. Dig Endosc. 2022;34:325-333. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Singh AP, Singla N, Budhwani E, Januszewicz W, Memon SF, Inavolu P, Nabi Z, Jagtap N, Kalapala R, Lakhtakia S, Darisetty S, Reddy DN, Ramchandani M. Defining "true acid reflux" after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;99:166-173.e3. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Kotla R, Tandan M, Goud R, Darisetty S, Rao GV, Reddy DN. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy is unpredictable, but responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy: a large, single-center study. Endoscopy. 2020;52:643-651. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Shiwaku H, Sato H, Shimamura Y, Abe H, Shiota J, Sato C, Ominami M, Sakae H, Hata Y, Fukuda H, Ogawa R, Nakamura J, Tatsuta T, Ikebuchi Y, Yokomichi H, Hasegawa S, Inoue H. Risk factors and long-term course of gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: A large-scale multicenter cohort study in Japan. Endoscopy. 2022;54:839-847. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Rassoul Abu-Nuwar M, Eriksson SE, Sarici IS, Zheng P, Hoppo T, Jobe BA, Ayazi S. GERD after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: Assessment of Incidence and Predisposing Factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2023;236:58-70. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Vespa E, Pellegatta G, Chandrasekar VT, Spadaccini M, Patel H, Maselli R, Galtieri PA, Carlani E, Sharma P, Hassan C, Repici A. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2023;55:167-175. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Gu L, Ouyang Z, Lv L, Liang C, Zhu H, Liu D. Safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy with standard myotomy versus short myotomy for treatment-naïve patients with type II achalasia: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93:1304-1312. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44] [Article Influence: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Kawara F, Watanabe D, Hoshi N, Abe H, Ariyoshi R, Ohara Y, Takao T, Morita Y, Umegaki E, Kodama Y. Novel per-oral endoscopic myotomy method preserving oblique muscle using two penetrating vessels as anatomic landmarks reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;34:2158-2163. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Attaar M, Su B, Wong HJ, Kuchta K, Denham W, Haggerty SP, Linn J, Ujiki MB. Intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) results and development of esophagitis in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2021;35:4555-4562. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Nagi TK, Suarez ZK, Haider MA, Holder SS, Vallejo C, Chaudhari SS. Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy-Induced Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Review of the Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors as a Management Strategy: Review of the Literature. Cureus. 2023;15:e50324. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |