Review Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2015; 21(3): 786-793
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.786
Role of E3 ubiquitin ligases in gastric cancer
Ya-Chao Hou, Jing-Yu Deng, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, City Key Laboratory of Tianjin Cancer Center, and National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
Author contributions: Hou YC and Deng JY contributed equally to this work; Hou YC wrote the paper; and Deng JY designed the research.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Jing-Yu Deng, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, City Key Laboratory of Tianjin Cancer Center, and National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300060, China. dengery@126.com
Telephone: +86-22-23340123 Fax: +86-22-23359904
Received: September 1, 2014
Peer-review started: September 7, 2014
First decision: October 14, 2014
Revised: November 1, 2014
Accepted: December 1, 2014
Article in press: December 1, 2014
Published online: January 21, 2015
Processing time: 136 Days and 22.6 Hours

Abstract

E3 ubiquitin ligases have an important role in carcinogenesis and include a large family of proteins that catalyze the ubiquitination of many protein substrates for targeted degradation by the 26S proteasome. So far, E3 ubiquitin ligases have been reported to have a role in a variety of biological processes including cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Recently, several kinds of E3 ubiquitin ligases were demonstrated to be generally highly expressed in gastric cancer (GC) tissues and to contribute to carcinogenesis. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge and information about the clinical significance of E3 ubiquitin ligases in GC. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, encouraged the evaluation of other components of the ubiquitin proteasome system for pharmaceutical intervention. The clinical value of novel treatment strategies targeting aberrant E3 ubiquitin ligases for GC are discussed in the review.

Key Words: E3 ubiquitin ligases; Gastric cancer; Oncogene; Tumor suppressor gene; Target therapy

Core tip: E3 biquitin ligases are a large family of proteins that catalyze the ubiquitination of many protein substrates for targeted degradation by the 26S proteasome. They play an essential role in a variety of biological processes, including cell cycle regulation, proliferation and apoptosis. They are often found overexpressed in gastric cancer (GC) and their deregulation has been shown to contribute to GC development. The mechanisms of E3 ubiquitin ligases in the regulation of biological functions and their exact roles in carcinogenesis can help to develop specific E3 ubiquitin ligase inhibitors to improve the treatment strategies for GC patients.



INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, as well as one of the leading causes of cancer-related death[1]. More than half of these cases occur in Eastern Asia. It is well known that GC is highly invasive and metastatic, which is the main factor contributing to the high mortality rate of GC patients[2-4]. Although there are many studies of novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, the prognosis of patients with advanced GC remains poor[5]. It is well known that GC is a multifactorial and multistep disease which involves activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes during GC progression[6]. Genetic and epigenetic alterations, occurring in genes and molecules, occur in proliferation, invasion and metastasis of GC and influence its prognosis[7-10]. An understanding of these alterations may be critical for improvements in the diagnosis, treatment or prediction of prognosis of GC.

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a key role in the regulation of many cellular pathways by controlling the abundance, activity and localization of an enormous variety of cellular proteins[11-14]. The UPS targets a variety of proteins, including those that are misfolded, mutated, or otherwise damaged - the cellular version of quality control[15]. The attachment of ubiquitin to target proteins is mediated by three enzymes: E1, E2, E3. E1 involved in the ubiquitination process. E1 is the ubiquitin-activating enzyme recruiting ubiquitin. E2 is the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that transfers the ubiquitin to the targeted protein. E3 is the ubiquitin ligase acting as a scaffold protein that interacts with the E2 enzyme and transfers ubiquitin to the target protein[16,17]. This process is reversible through the action of deubiquitinases (DUBs) that remove ubiquitin chains linked to the target protein[18]. DUBs are also involved in ubiquitin processing and recycling[19]. In this process, E3 ubiquitin ligases perform a critical role through the selective binding of protein substrates. This review will focus on the role of E3 ubiquitin ligases in GC and their potential as a novel anticancer target.

E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASES

More than 600 E3 ubiquitin ligases are expressed in the human genome, allowing for the specificity of the ubiquitination system[20]. E3 enzymes are divided into subclasses based on their biochemical and structural features: HECT (homologous to E6-AP carboxy terminus), RING (a very interesting new gene) fingers, and U-box domains[21]. There are about 30 proteins containing the HECT domain. The RING fingers and U-box quitin ligases contain the new gene (RING) finger domain[22]. There are over 700 proteins containing the RING finger domain, but only a small part functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Unlike RING proteins, most HECT proteins, if not all, are believed to function as E3 ubiquitin ligases. RING and HECT E3 ubiquitin ligases use different catalytic mechanisms to promote the transfer of ubiquitin to targeted substrates. RING E3 ubiquitin ligases can promote the direct transfer of ubiquitin from E2 to the targeted substrate, whereas HECT E3 ubiquitin ligases interact with the cognate E2, followed by the formation of a thiolester linkage with ubiquitin and subsequent transfer of ubiquitin to the targeted substrate[23]. Many E3 ubiquitin ligases could be oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes because frequent deregulation of E3 ubiquitin ligases has been shown in gastric carcinogenesis. The function of E3 ubiquitin ligases in GC are discussed in detail below.

E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASES AS ONCOGENES IN GASTRIC CANCER

Some E3 ubiquitin ligases, such as MDM2 and MKRN1, have established roles in the cell cycle and apoptosis. Other E3 ubiquitin ligases, such as Cbl/Cbl-b/c-Cbl, Cullin1, and Hakai, may be similarly important in gastric carcinogenesis. These E3 ubiquitin ligases are overexpressed in GC, and their inhibition leads to cells growth arrest or apoptosis. The oncogenic E3 ubiquitin ligases in GC are discussed in detail below.

Murine double minute 2

The murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene encodes an important negative regulating protein which promotes ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of P53 by functioning as an E3 ubiquitin ligase[24,25]. SNP309, a T to G change at the 309th nucleotide in the first intron of the MDM2 gene, has been characterized and shown to increase the affinity of the transcriptional activator Sp1, resulting in higher levels of MDM2 RNA and protein and subsequent attenuation of the p53 pathway. Numerous studies have shown that MDM2 SNP309 is associated with increased risk and poor prognosis of GC[26-31]. Although MDM2 was characterized as a RING finger E3 for the tumor suppressor p53[32], its interaction with Nbs1 inhibited DNA break repair, leading to chromosome instability and subsequent transformation that was independent of p53[25,33]. MDM2 is expressed at higher levels in GC tissues than in non-cancerous gastric mucosa. In addition, MDM2 expression is associated with clinicopathologic features in patients treated only with surgery[34]. Moreover, MDM2 is a potential predictive factor for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin in patients with resectable GC[34].

Cullin1

Cullin1 is a scaffold protein of the ubiquitin E3 ligase Skp1/Cullin1/Rbx1/F-box protein complex, which ubiquitinates a broad range of proteins involved in cell-cycle progression, signal transduction, and transcription. Cullin1 is involved in the progression of several cancers[35-37], including GC. The high expression of Cullin1 was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival and lymph node metastasis of GC[7]. On the other hand, Korzeniewski demonstrated that Cullin1 may act as a tumor suppressor by regulating PLK4 protein levels[38].

Cbl/Cbl-b/c-Cbl

The Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (Cbl) family of ubiquitin ligases were identified as negative regulators of non-receptor tyrosine kinases or activated signaling pathways[39]. Some studies showed Cbl in conjunction with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) system might be associated with gastric carcinogenesis, invasion and metastasis[40,41]. Other authors showed that cCbl, Cblb, and EGFR are highly expressed in GC tissue and their expression levels are related to the invasion and development of GC. Both cCb l and Cblb were positively correlated with EGFR, suggesting that they may interact in the proliferation, infiltration, and metastasis of GC[42]. So Cbl, cCbl, Cblb might be deemed novel molecular markers for aggressive GC. However, another study found that the Cbl-b repressed insulin-like growth factor-1(IGF-1)-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition, likely through targeting the IGF-1 receptor, resulting in degradation and further inhibition of the Akt/ERK-miR-200c-ZEB2 axis in GC cells and a decrease in the risk of developing lymph node metastasis in patients with GC[43]. Some studies demonstrated an important role of Cbl-b in reversing Pgp-mediated GC multi-drug resistance through suppression of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and down-regulation of P-gp expression[44].

Hakai

Hakai was originally identified as an E3 ubiquitin-ligase for the E-cadherin complex[45]. Hakai contains Src homology (SH)2, RING-finger, and proline-rich domains, and it is structurally and functionally related to c-Cbl, a RING-finger type E3 ubiquitin ligase for receptor tyrosine kinases[46,47]. High expression of Hakai induced weakness of cell-cell adhesions and enhanced cell proliferation[48]. Overexpression of Hakai in GC and colon adenocarcinomas was reported to occur in the early stages of carcinogenesis and up-regulated cell proliferation[48,49]. Therefore, Hakai may be a valuable new biomarker or drug target for GC treatment.

Makorin ring finger protein 1

Makorin ring finger protein 1 (MKRN1) was reported to be a transcriptional co-regulator and an E3 ligase for hTERT[50]. MKRN1 simultaneously induced p53 and p21 ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent degradation. This suggested that the presence of MKRN1 in cancer cells may affect p53- and p21-dependent apoptosis and cell growth. MKRN1 remains unique in its ability to negatively regulate the major tumor suppressors including p14ARF and p53[51]. MKRN1 may induce gastric carcinogenesis by regulating the p14ARF-associated pathways, and thus potentially represent an important therapeutic target in GC[52].

E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASES AS TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES INS GASTRIC CANCER

Numerous E3 ubiquitin ligases, including FBXW7 and CHIP, have been shown to be tumor suppressors in GC. Frequent inactivating mutations or downregulated expression of these E3 ubiquitin ligases have been detected in GC. Several discovered E3 ubiquitin ligases, such as CHFR, ZNRF3, and RNF180, may play an important role in regulating gastric carcinogenesis. Besides mutation and gene copy loss, epigenetic alteration (i.e., promoter methylation) also contributed to inactivation of these tumor suppressors. E3 ubiquitin ligases with tumor suppressor activity in GC are discussed in detail below.

FBXW7/CDC4

The FBXW7/CDC4 gene, which maps to 4q32, encodes a ubiquitin ligase and has been implicated as a tumor suppressor gene in many tumor types, including GC. FBXW7/CDC4 targets several oncoproteins, including cyclin-E, c-myc, c-jun, Notch 1 and Notch 4, for degradation. and its tumor suppressor function was thought to be exerted through these substrates[53]. Loss of FBXW7/CDC4 was seen in both early-onset GC and advanced GC[54]. FBXW7 inactivation contributed to poor prognosis via genome instability and cell cycle progression. Recent studies suggested that GC patients with inactivation of FBXW7 had aggressive cancer and a poor prognosis[55,56]. Loss of FBXW7 expression could lead to MYC overexpression, and was associated with poor prognosis in GC patients[56]. In the future, FBXW7/CDC4 may be a potential diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target for GC.

Ring finger protein 180

Ring finger protein 180 (RNF180), a novel member of the RING finger protein family and function as an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is well conserved among vertebrates[57]. High expression of RNF180 suppressed cell growth and induced apoptosis, which were mediated by upregulating the antiproliferation regulators MTSS1 and CDKN2A and the proapoptotic mediator TIMP3[58]. Promoter methylation of RNF180 was detected in 76% of primary GC and 55% of intestinal metaplasia, but was not detected in any of the normal gastric tissues, suggesting methylation of this gene was a common and early event in gastric carcinogenesis. Promoter methylation of RNF180 DNA was more frequently detected in the GC tissue samples, which led to low or loss of RNF180 expression in GC patients with poor overall survival[58]. Our study showed that methylation of CpG sites(-116, -80, +97, and +102) in the RNF180 DNA promoter predicted poor prognosis of GC[10].

CHIP

CHIP (carboxy terminus of Hsc70 interacting protein) was reported to be an E3 ubiquitin ligase that could induce ubiquitination and degradation of several tumor-related proteins, and acted as a suppressor of tumor metastasis. CHIP inactivation was significantly correlated with GC progression, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, and tumor differentiation. Therefore, CHIP inactivation was an independent prognostic marker of poor survival in GC patients as well as added significant prognostic value to the well known clinical prognostic factors[8,59]. Moreover, CHIP suppresses GC angiogenesis by inhibiting nuclear factor (NF)-κB activity through ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation of the NF-κBep65 and downregulation of the proangiogenic cytokine interleukin-8[8]. Therefore, CHIP may be as a potential diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target for GC.

CHFR

The CHFR gene encodes a RING finger domain containing E3, as a tumor suppressor gene, which was shown to play an important role in mitosis through targeting key mitotic proteins Aurora A and Plk for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis[60,61]. Loss of CHFR mRNA expression was a consequence of promoter methylation, suggesting that it played a tumor suppressor role in gastric carcinogenesis[62,63]. CHFR promoter methylation status may be of value in predicting malignant behavior or as a molecular diagnostic marker for GC[64-66]. Moreover, CHFR promoter methylation was a sensitive marker for the effect of docetaxel in GC patients[67].

COP1

COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenic 1, also known as RFWD2) is a p53-targeting E3 ubiquitin ligase, containing RING-finger, WD40-repeat domains, and coiled-coil[68-70]. Whether the COP1 gene is an oncogene or a tumor suppressor gene remains controversial. Some studies showed that COP1 acted as a tumor suppressor[71-73]. However, other studies indicated that COP1 acted as an oncogene[74]. One study showed that loss of COP1 expression determined poor prognosis in patients with GC[9]. However, another study showed that COP1 overexpression was associated with poor prognosis in primary GC[75]. Therefore, COP1 may be worth further investigation to determine the fundamental biology of GC.

ZNRF3

ZNRF3, a unique transmembrane E3 ubiquitin ligase, suppresses the β-catenin signaling initiated by endogenous Wnt proteins[76]. ZNRF3 was reported as a negative regulator of the Wnt pathway that inhibited cancer cell growth and promoted cell apoptosis. ZNRF3 inhibited GC cell growth and promoted the cell apoptosis by limiting the Wnt/beta-catenin/TCF signaling pathway[77]. In the future, a novel therapeutic strategy based on ZNRF3 may be of value in patients with GC.

TARGETING E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASES FOR GC THERAPY

The success of bortezomib, a selective proteasome inhibitor, for treating refractory myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, showed that modulation of UPS may represent a novel strategy for GC. However, in a nonrandomized Phase II clinical trial conducted in 16 patients with advanced GC, bortezomib, at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2i.v. twice weekly for 2 wk (days 1, 4, 8 and 11) every 21 d, did not show any clinical activity (no patient responded and only one patient achieved stable disease as the best response)[78]. In addition, 14 out of 16 patients experienced grade 2 or greater toxicity. Similar outcomes were obtained in another clinical trial[79]. These studies showed that proteasome inhibition in GC should include combination therapy with targeted agents focusing on nonoverlapping oncogenic pathways.

By selectively inhibiting an E3 ubiquitin ligase, the proteins that are regulated by this E3 ubiquitin ligase can be stabilized, thereby avoiding any unwanted effects on other cellular proteins. Targeting of the E3 ubiquitin ligase has gained increasing attention, and has led to the development of high-throughput screening assays to identify inhibitors of multiple E3 ubiquitin ligases[80]. Nutlin-3 has potent antitumor activity against human GC cells with wt p53 and has shown promise as a single agent and in combination with conventional anticancer drugs[81]. Small molecule compounds, such as Nutlin-3a, RITA, and MI-219, have been identified as potent MDM2 inhibitors[82-85]. These small molecule compounds disrupted MDM2-mediated p53 degradation and thus led to tumor regression by inducing p53-mediated cell cycle arrest and cell death[82-85]. Therefore, using analogs of MDM2, or using agonists of Mdm2 with other therapeutic modalities may be of use as neoadjuvant therapy for GC within a few years.

Recognition of molecules that could promote the activity of FBXW7 and subsequently enhance the degradation of its oncogenic substrates could also be a very good anticancer treatment strategy. It has been shown that a natural dietary agent genistein inhibited miR-223 expression and subsequently up-regulated FBXW7, leading to cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells[86]. Another study indicated that rapamycin suppressed FBXW7 loss-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like characteristics in colorectal cancer cells[87]. However, there are no inhibitors targeting FBXW7 that is currently being tested in preclinical and clinical trials in GC. In the future, targeting FBXW7 may be useful in patients with GC.

SCF ligases, also known as CRL (Cullin-RING ubiquitin Ligases), are the largest family of ubiquitin ligases, and promote the degradation of about 20% of UPS-regulated proteins[88,89], including cell cycle regulatory proteins, transcription factors, oncoproteins and tumor suppressors among others[90,91]. Post-translational neddylation of CUL, a process triggered by the NEDD8-activating enzyme E1 subunit 1 (NAE1), is required for CRL/SCF activation. Recently, MLN4924 was discovered via a high-throughput screen as a specific NAE1 inhibitor and first-in-class anticancer drug[92,93]. The efficacy and mechanism of action of MLN4924 has been tested in vitro and in mouse models and has shown promising anticancer activity in a wide-range of malignancies[94-99], though these did not include GC. MLN4924 is currently in multiple phase I clinical trials for both solid tumors and hematological malignancies[88]. We believe that MLN4924 may be used in patients with GC in the near future.

CONCLUSION

The E3 ubiquitin ligases play an essential role in a variety of biological processes including cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Although further research is necessary to better understand the biological functions of E3 ubiquitin ligases, it has become clear that some E3 ubiquitin ligases, such as those described in this review, are promising targets for GC therapy. Perhaps the greatest challenge for scientists trying to manipulate the E3 ubiquitin ligases in GC cells will be to delineate the role of targeted proteins as tumor suppressors or oncogenes. The effect of such proteins can be influenced by many factors, some of which are still unknown. There remain other obstacles to overcome before targeting E3 ubiquitin ligases as a viable treatment option. The main obstacle is selectivity, and any new therapies must target only cancer cells and not healthy ones. While targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases in GC therapy is still at an early stage, continued research on the E3 ubiquitin ligases should lead to the discovery of new therapeutic targets that may boost the development of more specific, less toxic, and more efficacious anti-cancer therapeutics.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Marrelli D, Wang WH S- Editor: Ma YJ L- Editor: Cant MR E- Editor: Ma S

References
1.  Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69-90.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23762]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25335]  [Article Influence: 1948.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (7)]
2.  Steeg PS. Tumor metastasis: mechanistic insights and clinical challenges. Nat Med. 2006;12:895-904.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1484]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1578]  [Article Influence: 87.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Huo ZB, Chen SP, Li H, Wu DC. Defining a subgroup treatable for laparoscopic surgery in poorly differentiated early gastric cancer: the role of lymph node metastasis. Cancer Biol Med. 2012;9:54-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  López-Basave HN, Morales-Vásquez F, Ruiz-Molina JM, Namendys-Silva SA, Vela-Sarmiento I, Ruan JM, Rosciano AE, Calderillo-Ruiz G, Díaz-Romero C, Herrera-Gómez A. Gastric cancer in young people under 30 years of age: worse prognosis, or delay in diagnosis? Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:31-36.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Zheng L, Wang L, Ajani J, Xie K. Molecular basis of gastric cancer development and progression. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:61-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 120]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 135]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Chen CN, Lin JJ, Chen JJ, Lee PH, Yang CY, Kuo ML, Chang KJ, Hsieh FJ. Gene expression profile predicts patient survival of gastric cancer after surgical resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7286-7295.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Bai J, Zhou Y, Chen G, Zeng J, Ding J, Tan Y, Zhou J, Li G. Overexpression of Cullin1 is associated with poor prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Hum Pathol. 2011;42:375-383.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Wang S, Wu X, Zhang J, Chen Y, Xu J, Xia X, He S, Qiang F, Li A, Shu Y. CHIP functions as a novel suppressor of tumour angiogenesis with prognostic significance in human gastric cancer. Gut. 2013;62:496-508.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 93]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Sawada G, Ueo H, Matsumura T, Uchi R, Ishibashi M, Mima K, Kurashige J, Takahashi Y, Akiyoshi S, Sudo T. Loss of COP1 expression determines poor prognosisin patients with gastric cancer. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:1971-1975.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Deng J, Liang H, Ying G, Zhang R, Wang B, Yu J, Fan D, Hao X. Methylation of CpG sites in RNF180 DNA promoter prediction poor survival of gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2014;5:3173-3183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Reinstein E, Ciechanover A. Narrative review: protein degradation and human diseases: the ubiquitin connection. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:676-684.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 164]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 159]  [Article Influence: 8.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Varshavsky A. The ubiquitin system, an immense realm. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:167-176.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 220]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 223]  [Article Influence: 18.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Eldridge AG, O’Brien T. Therapeutic strategies within the ubiquitin proteasome system. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:4-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 84]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Hoeller D, Dikic I. Targeting the ubiquitin system in cancer therapy. Nature. 2009;458:438-444.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 417]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 458]  [Article Influence: 30.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Hershko A. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation and some of its roles in the control of the cell division cycle. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1191-1197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 231]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 239]  [Article Influence: 12.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Komander D. The emerging complexity of protein ubiquitination. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:937-953.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 564]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 606]  [Article Influence: 40.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Dikic I, Wakatsuki S, Walters KJ. Ubiquitin-binding domains - from structures to functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:659-671.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 608]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 653]  [Article Influence: 43.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Komander D, Clague MJ, Urbé S. Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:550-563.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1406]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1554]  [Article Influence: 103.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Nijman SM, Luna-Vargas MP, Velds A, Brummelkamp TR, Dirac AM, Sixma TK, Bernards R. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell. 2005;123:773-786.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1317]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1445]  [Article Influence: 80.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Li W, Bengtson MH, Ulbrich A, Matsuda A, Reddy VA, Orth A, Chanda SK, Batalov S, Joazeiro CA. Genome-wide and functional annotation of human E3 ubiquitin ligases identifies MULAN, a mitochondrial E3 that regulates the organelle’s dynamics and signaling. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1487.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 521]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 576]  [Article Influence: 36.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Ardley HC, Robinson PA. E3 ubiquitin ligases. Essays Biochem. 2005;41:15-30.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 98]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 202]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425-479.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6346]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6512]  [Article Influence: 250.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Berndsen CE, Wolberger C. New insights into ubiquitin E3 ligase mechanism. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:301-307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 400]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 491]  [Article Influence: 49.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Oren M, Damalas A, Gottlieb T, Michael D, Taplick J, Leal JF, Maya R, Moas M, Seger R, Taya Y. Regulation of p53: intricate loops and delicate balances. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;973:374-383.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Bouska A, Lushnikova T, Plaza S, Eischen CM. Mdm2 promotes genetic instability and transformation independent of p53. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:4862-4874.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Yang M, Guo Y, Zhang X, Miao X, Tan W, Sun T, Zhao D, Yu D, Liu J, Lin D. Interaction of P53 Arg72Pro and MDM2 T309G polymorphisms and their associations with risk of gastric cardia cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:1996-2001.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Wang X, Yang J, Ho B, Yang Y, Huang Z, Zhang Z, Zhang G. Interaction of Helicobacter pylori with genetic variants in the MDM2 promoter, is associated with gastric cancer susceptibility in Chinese patients. Helicobacter. 2009;14:114-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Pan X, Li Y, Feng J, Wang X, Hao B, Shi R, Zhang G. A functional polymorphism T309G in MDM2 gene promoter, intensified by Helicobacter pylori lipopolysaccharide, is associated with both an increased susceptibility and poor prognosis of gastric carcinoma in Chinese patients. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Tian X, Tian Y, Ma P, Sui CG, Meng FD, Li Y, Fu LY, Jiang T, Wang Y, Ji FJ. Association between MDM2 SNP309 T& gt; G and risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:1925-1929.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Chen B, Cao L, Hu KW, Zhang JW, Meng XL, Xiong MM. MDM2 SNP309 is an ethnicity-dependent risk factor for digestive tract cancers. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:3431-3438.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Chen W, Wu Q, Ren H. Meta-analysis of associations between MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and gastric cancer risk. Biomed Rep. 2014;2:105-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A, Oren M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature. 1997;387:296-299.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3222]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3329]  [Article Influence: 123.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Piette J, Neel H, Maréchal V. Mdm2: keeping p53 under control. Oncogene. 1997;15:1001-1010.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 197]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 191]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Ye Y, Li X, Yang J, Miao S, Wang S, Chen Y, Xia X, Wu X, Zhang J, Zhou Y. MDM2 is a useful prognostic biomarker for resectable gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:590-598.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Bai J, Yong HM, Chen FF, Mei PJ, Liu H, Li C, Pan ZQ, Wu YP, Zheng JN. Cullin1 is a novel marker of poor prognosis and a potential therapeutic target in human breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2016-2022.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Xu M, Yang X, Zhao J, Zhang J, Zhang S, Huang H, Liu Y, Liu J. High expression of Cullin1 indicates poor prognosis for NSCLC patients. Pathol Res Pract. 2014;210:397-401.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Chen G, Li G. Increased Cul1 expression promotes melanoma cell proliferation through regulating p27 expression. Int J Oncol. 2010;37:1339-1344.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Korzeniewski N, Zheng L, Cuevas R, Parry J, Chatterjee P, Anderton B, Duensing A, Münger K, Duensing S. Cullin 1 functions as a centrosomal suppressor of centriole multiplication by regulating polo-like kinase 4 protein levels. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6668-6675.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 691]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Mohapatra B, Ahmad G, Nadeau S, Zutshi N, An W, Scheffe S, Dong L, Feng D, Goetz B, Arya P. Protein tyrosine kinase regulation by ubiquitination: critical roles of Cbl-family ubiquitin ligases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:122-139.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Ito R, Nakayama H, Yoshida K, Matsumura S, Oda N, Yasui W. Expression of Cbl linking with the epidermal growth factor receptor system is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis of human gastric carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2004;444:324-331.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Lai AZ, Durrant M, Zuo D, Ratcliffe CD, Park M. Met kinase-dependent loss of the E3 ligase Cbl in gastric cancer. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:8048-8059.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Dong Q, Liu YP, Qu XJ, Hou KZ, Li LL. [Expression of c-Cbl, Cbl-b, and epidermal growth factor receptor in gastric carcinoma and their clinical significance]. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29:59-64.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Li H, Xu L, Li C, Zhao L, Ma Y, Zheng H, Li Z, Zhang Y, Wang R, Liu Y. Ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b represses IGF-I-induced epithelial mesenchymal transition via ZEB2 and microRNA-200c regulation in gastric cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Zhang Y, Qu X, Hu X, Yang X, Hou K, Teng Y, Zhang J, Sada K, Liu Y. Reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated multi-drug resistance by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b in human gastric adenocarcinoma cells. J Pathol. 2009;218:248-255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Mukherjee M, Chow SY, Yusoff P, Seetharaman J, Ng C, Sinniah S, Koh XW, Asgar NF, Li D, Yim D. Structure of a novel phosphotyrosine-binding domain in Hakai that targets E-cadherin. EMBO J. 2012;31:1308-1319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Joazeiro CA, Wing SS, Huang H, Leverson JD, Hunter T, Liu YC. The tyrosine kinase negative regulator c-Cbl as a RING-type, E2-dependent ubiquitin-protein ligase. Science. 1999;286:309-312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 832]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 816]  [Article Influence: 32.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Levkowitz G, Waterman H, Ettenberg SA, Katz M, Tsygankov AY, Alroy I, Lavi S, Iwai K, Reiss Y, Ciechanover A. Ubiquitin ligase activity and tyrosine phosphorylation underlie suppression of growth factor signaling by c-Cbl/Sli-1. Mol Cell. 1999;4:1029-1040.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 776]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 775]  [Article Influence: 31.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Figueroa A, Kotani H, Toda Y, Mazan-Mamczarz K, Mueller EC, Otto A, Disch L, Norman M, Ramdasi RM, Keshtgar M. Novel roles of hakai in cell proliferation and oncogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:3533-3542.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Abella V, Valladares M, Rodriguez T, Haz M, Blanco M, Tarrío N, Iglesias P, Aparicio LA, Figueroa A. miR-203 regulates cell proliferation through its influence on Hakai expression. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52568.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Kim JH, Park SM, Kang MR, Oh SY, Lee TH, Muller MT, Chung IK. Ubiquitin ligase MKRN1 modulates telomere length homeostasis through a proteolysis of hTERT. Genes Dev. 2005;19:776-781.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 132]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 136]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Lee EW, Lee MS, Camus S, Ghim J, Yang MR, Oh W, Ha NC, Lane DP, Song J. Differential regulation of p53 and p21 by MKRN1 E3 ligase controls cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. EMBO J. 2009;28:2100-2113.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 110]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Ko A, Shin JY, Seo J, Lee KD, Lee EW, Lee MS, Lee HW, Choi IJ, Jeong JS, Chun KH. Acceleration of gastric tumorigenesis through MKRN1-mediated posttranslational regulation of p14ARF. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1660-1672.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Wang L, Ye X, Liu Y, Wei W, Wang Z. Aberrant regulation of FBW7 in cancer. Oncotarget. 2014;5:2000-2015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Milne AN, Leguit R, Corver WE, Morsink FH, Polak M, de Leng WW, Carvalho R, Offerhaus GJ. Loss of CDC4/FBXW7 in gastric carcinoma. Cell Oncol. 2010;32:347-359.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Yokobori T, Mimori K, Iwatsuki M, Ishii H, Onoyama I, Fukagawa T, Kuwano H, Nakayama KI, Mori M. p53-Altered FBXW7 expression determines poor prognosis in gastric cancer cases. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3788-3794.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 109]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Calcagno DQ, Freitas VM, Leal MF, de Souza CR, Demachki S, Montenegro R, Assumpção PP, Khayat AS, Smith Mde A, dos Santos AK. MYC, FBXW7 and TP53 copy number variation and expression in gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:141.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Ogawa M, Mizugishi K, Ishiguro A, Koyabu Y, Imai Y, Takahashi R, Mikoshiba K, Aruga J. Rines/RNF180, a novel RING finger gene-encoded product, is a membrane-bound ubiquitin ligase. Genes Cells. 2008;13:397-409.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Cheung KF, Lam CN, Wu K, Ng EK, Chong WW, Cheng AS, To KF, Fan D, Sung JJ, Yu J. Characterization of the gene structure, functional significance, and clinical application of RNF180, a novel gene in gastric cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:947-959.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Gan L, Liu DB, Lu HF, Long GX, Mei Q, Hu GY, Qiu H, Hu GQ. Decreased expression of the carboxyl terminus of heat shock cognate 70 interacting protein in human gastric cancer and its clinical significance. Oncol Rep. 2012;28:1392-1398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Kang D, Chen J, Wong J, Fang G. The checkpoint protein Chfr is a ligase that ubiquitinates Plk1 and inhibits Cdc2 at the G2 to M transition. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:249-259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 145]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 144]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Yu X, Minter-Dykhouse K, Malureanu L, Zhao WM, Zhang D, Merkle CJ, Ward IM, Saya H, Fang G, van Deursen J. Chfr is required for tumor suppression and Aurora A regulation. Nat Genet. 2005;37:401-406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 148]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 153]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Gao YJ, Xin Y, Zhang JJ, Zhou J. Mechanism and pathobiologic implications of CHFR promoter methylation in gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:5000-5007.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Hu SL, Kong XY, Cheng ZD, Sun YB, Shen G, Xu WP, Wu L, Xu XC, Jiang XD, Huang DB. Promoter methylation of p16, Runx3, DAPK and CHFR genes is frequent in gastric carcinoma. Tumori. 2010;96:726-733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Hu SL, Huang DB, Sun YB, Wu L, Xu WP, Yin S, Chen J, Jiang XD, Shen G. Pathobiologic implications of methylation and expression status of Runx3 and CHFR genes in gastric cancer. Med Oncol. 2011;28:447-454.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Honda T, Tamura G, Waki T, Kawata S, Nishizuka S, Motoyama T. Promoter hypermethylation of the Chfr gene in neoplastic and non-neoplastic gastric epithelia. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:2013-2016.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Morioka Y, Hibi K, Sakai M, Koike M, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Ito K, Nakao A. Aberrant methylation of the CHFR gene in digestive tract cancer. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:1791-1795.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Li Y, Yang Y, Lu Y, Herman JG, Brock MV, Zhao P, Guo M. Predictive value of CHFR and MLH1 methylation in human gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;Epub ahead of print.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Bianchi E, Denti S, Catena R, Rossetti G, Polo S, Gasparian S, Putignano S, Rogge L, Pardi R. Characterization of human constitutive photomorphogenesis protein 1, a RING finger ubiquitin ligase that interacts with Jun transcription factors and modulates their transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:19682-19690.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Kato S, Ding J, Pisck E, Jhala US, Du K. COP1 functions as a FoxO1 ubiquitin E3 ligase to regulate FoxO1-mediated gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:35464-35473.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Wang L, He G, Zhang P, Wang X, Jiang M, Yu L. Interplay between MDM2, MDMX, Pirh2 and COP1: the negative regulators of p53. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:229-236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Migliorini D, Bogaerts S, Defever D, Vyas R, Denecker G, Radaelli E, Zwolinska A, Depaepe V, Hochepied T, Skarnes WC. Cop1 constitutively regulates c-Jun protein stability and functions as a tumor suppressor in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1329-1343.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 92]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 101]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Vitari AC, Leong KG, Newton K, Yee C, O’Rourke K, Liu J, Phu L, Vij R, Ferrando R, Couto SS. COP1 is a tumour suppressor that causes degradation of ETS transcription factors. Nature. 2011;474:403-406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 123]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 10.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Shao J, Teng Y, Padia R, Hong S, Noh H, Xie X, Mumm JS, Dong Z, Ding HF, Cowell J. COP1 and GSK3β cooperate to promote c-Jun degradation and inhibit breast cancer cell tumorigenesis. Neoplasia. 2013;15:1075-1085.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
74.  Dornan D, Bheddah S, Newton K, Ince W, Frantz GD, Dowd P, Koeppen H, Dixit VM, French DM. COP1, the negative regulator of p53, is overexpressed in breast and ovarian adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7226-7230.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 103]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Li YF, Wang DD, Zhao BW, Wang W, Huang CY, Chen YM, Zheng Y, Keshari RP, Xia JC, Zhou ZW. High level of COP1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in primary gastric cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8:1168-1177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Hao HX, Xie Y, Zhang Y, Charlat O, Oster E, Avello M, Lei H, Mickanin C, Liu D, Ruffner H. ZNRF3 promotes Wnt receptor turnover in an R-spondin-sensitive manner. Nature. 2012;485:195-200.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 628]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 685]  [Article Influence: 57.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Zhou Y, Lan J, Wang W, Shi Q, Lan Y, Cheng Z, Guan H. ZNRF3 acts as a tumour suppressor by the Wnt signalling pathway in human gastric adenocarcinoma. J Mol Histol. 2013;44:555-563.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Shah MA, Power DG, Kindler HL, Holen KD, Kemeny MM, Ilson DH, Tang L, Capanu M, Wright JJ, Kelsen DP. A multicenter, phase II study of bortezomib (PS-341) in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Invest New Drugs. 2011;29:1475-1481.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Jatoi A, Dakhil SR, Foster NR, Ma C, Rowland KM, Moore DF, Jaslowski AJ, Thomas SP, Hauge MD, Flynn PJ. Bortezomib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin as a first-line regimen for patients with metastatic esophageal, gastric, and gastroesophageal cancer: phase II results from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N044B). J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:516-520.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Goldenberg SJ, Marblestone JG, Mattern MR, Nicholson B. Strategies for the identification of ubiquitin ligase inhibitors. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38:132-136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Endo S, Yamato K, Hirai S, Moriwaki T, Fukuda K, Suzuki H, Abei M, Nakagawa I, Hyodo I. Potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of MDM2 inhibitor nutlin-3 in gastric cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:605-613.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
82.  Haaland I, Opsahl JA, Berven FS, Reikvam H, Fredly HK, Haugse R, Thiede B, McCormack E, Lain S, Bruserud O. Molecular mechanisms of nutlin-3 involve acetylation of p53, histones and heat shock proteins in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:116.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Wang H, Chen G, Wang H, Liu C. RITA inhibits growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma through induction of apoptosis. Oncol Res. 2013;20:437-445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
84.  Tsao CC, Corn PG. MDM-2 antagonists induce p53-dependent cell cycle arrest but not cell death in renal cancer cell lines. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:1315-1325.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Tovar C, Rosinski J, Filipovic Z, Higgins B, Kolinsky K, Hilton H, Zhao X, Vu BT, Qing W, Packman K. Small-molecule MDM2 antagonists reveal aberrant p53 signaling in cancer: implications for therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:1888-1893.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 516]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 542]  [Article Influence: 30.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
86.  Ma J, Cheng L, Liu H, Zhang J, Shi Y, Zeng F, Miele L, Sarkar FH, Xia J, Wang Z. Genistein down-regulates miR-223 expression in pancreatic cancer cells. Curr Drug Targets. 2013;14:1150-1156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 74]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Wang Y, Liu Y, Lu J, Zhang P, Wang Y, Xu Y, Wang Z, Mao JH, Wei G. Rapamycin inhibits FBXW7 loss-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like characteristics in colorectal cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;434:352-356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Soucy TA, Smith PG, Milhollen MA, Berger AJ, Gavin JM, Adhikari S, Brownell JE, Burke KE, Cardin DP, Critchley S. An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer. Nature. 2009;458:732-736.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1319]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1543]  [Article Influence: 102.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
89.  Deshaies RJ. SCF and Cullin/Ring H2-based ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999;15:435-467.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
90.  Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ. Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:9-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
91.  Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:399-434.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1834]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1974]  [Article Influence: 131.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
92.  Blank JL, Liu XJ, Cosmopoulos K, Bouck DC, Garcia K, Bernard H, Tayber O, Hather G, Liu R, Narayanan U. Novel DNA damage checkpoints mediating cell death induced by the NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924. Cancer Res. 2013;73:225-234.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
93.  Nawrocki ST, Griffin P, Kelly KR, Carew JS. MLN4924: a novel first-in-class inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2012;21:1563-1573.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 127]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 150]  [Article Influence: 12.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
94.  McMillin DW, Jacobs HM, Delmore JE, Buon L, Hunter ZR, Monrose V, Yu J, Smith PG, Richardson PG, Anderson KC. Molecular and cellular effects of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibition in myeloma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:942-951.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
95.  Milhollen MA, Traore T, Adams-Duffy J, Thomas MP, Berger AJ, Dang L, Dick LR, Garnsey JJ, Koenig E, Langston SP. MLN4924, a NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, is active in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma models: rationale for treatment of NF-{kappa}B-dependent lymphoma. Blood. 2010;116:1515-1523.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 252]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 264]  [Article Influence: 18.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
96.  Li L, Wang M, Yu G, Chen P, Li H, Wei D, Zhu J, Xie L, Jia H, Shi J. Overactivated neddylation pathway as a therapeutic target in lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju083.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 137]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
97.  Wang X, Li L, Liang Y, Li C, Zhao H, Ye D, Sun M, Jeong LS, Feng Y, Fu S. Targeting the neddylation pathway to suppress the growth of prostate cancer cells: therapeutic implication for the men’s cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:974309.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
98.  Gao Q, Yu GY, Shi JY, Li LH, Zhang WJ, Wang ZC, Yang LX, Duan M, Zhao H, Wang XY. Neddylation pathway is up-regulated in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and serves as a potential therapeutic target. Oncotarget. 2014;5:7820-7832.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
99.  Yang D, Tan M, Wang G, Sun Y. The p21-dependent radiosensitization of human breast cancer cells by MLN4924, an investigational inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34079.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 72]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]