Brief Article Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2013; 19(3): 389-393
Published online Jan 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.389
Preoperative carcinoembryonic antibody is predictive of distant metastasis in pathologically T1 colorectal cancer after radical surgery
Zheng Lou, Rong-Gui Meng, Wei Zhang, En-Da Yu, Chuan-Gang Fu, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200433, China
Author contributions: Lou Z, Meng RG, Zhang W and Yu ED performed the majority of patient treatment; Meng RG and Fu CG coordinated and collected all the clinical data in addition to providing financial support for this work; Lou Z and Meng RG designed the study, wrote and revised the manuscript.
Supported by Changhai Hospital 1255 Project Fund, No. CH125542500
Correspondence to: Dr. Rong-Gui Meng, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, No. 168, Changhai Road, Shanghai 200433, China. rongguimeng@163.com
Telephone: +86-21-31161608 Fax: +86-21-31161608
Received: September 19, 2012
Revised: December 12, 2012
Accepted: December 22, 2012
Published online: January 21, 2013
Processing time: 124 Days and 10.5 Hours

Abstract

AIM: To identify the predictors of distant metastasis in pathologically T1 (pT1) colorectal cancer (CRC) after radical resection.

METHODS: Variables including age, gender, preoperative carcinoembryonic antibody (CEA) level, tumor location, tumor size, lymph node status, and histological grade were recorded. Patients with and without metastasis were compared with regard to age, gender, CEA level and pathologic tumor characteristics using the independent t test or χ2 test, as appropriate. Risk factors were determined by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Metastasis occurred in 6 (3.8%) of the 159 patients during a median follow-up of 67.0 (46.5%) mo. The rates of distant metastasis in patients with pT1 cancer of the colon and rectum were 6.7% and 2.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The rates of distant metastasis between male and female patients with T1 CRC were 6.25% and 1.27%, respectively (P < 0.001). The most frequent site of distant metastasis was the liver. Age (P = 0.522), gender (P = 0.980), tumor location (P = 0.330), tumor size (P = 0.786), histological grade (P = 0.509), and high serum CEA level (P = 0.262) were not prognostic factors for lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that age (P = 0.231), gender (P = 0.137), tumor location (P = 0.386), and tumor size (P = 0.514) were not risk factors for distant metastasis after radical resection for T1 colorectal cancer. Postoperative metastasis was only significantly correlated with high preoperative serum CEA level (P = 0.001). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, high preoperative serum CEA level (P = 0.004; odds ratio 15.341; 95%CI 2.371-99.275) was an independent predictor for postoperative distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION: The preoperative increased serum CEA level is a predictive risk factor for distant metastasis in CRC patients after radical resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be necessary in such patients, even if they have pT1 colorectal cancer.

Key Words: Colorectal cancer; Risk factor; Metastasis; Pathologically T1; Carcinoembryonic antigen



INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Europe and the United States[1-3]. Similarly, it is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths in China and the incidence of CRC is rapidly increasing[4,5].

The standard surgical treatment for CRC is radical resection. Recent advances in diagnostic methods have led to an increase in the detection of T1 CRC[6,7]. Local excision has been substituted for radical resection in some patients with early CRC. However, local excision may result in a higher rate of local recurrence than radical resection in patients with T1 CRC. Local excision leaves metastatic lymph nodes in 8%-15% of pathologically T1 (pT1) CRC patients without definitively retrieving regional lymph nodes[8], resulting in a recurrence rate of 4.1%-39%[9]. However, the recurrence rate has been reported to be 1.3%-2.8% after radical resection of early CRC[6,10]. To minimize recurrence, radical surgery has been performed in China for the treatment of most patients with pT1 CRC.

Previous studies have focused on evaluating the risk factors for lymph node metastasis[10-13], and there is little evidence with regard to the risk factors for postoperative distant metastasis in patients with pT1 CRC. The aim of the present study was to identify the predictive risk factors that may suggest postoperative distant metastasis in patients with pT1 CRC after radical resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-nine patients with pT1 CRC who had undergone radical resection with lymph node dissection between January 2005 and June 2011 were enrolled. All patients were followed up until December 2011. The study was performed after approval by the Ethics Committee at the Second Military Medical University in Shanghai, China. None of these patients had received preoperative radiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with pT1 CRC who were treated by endoscopic mucosal resection or transanal resection were excluded. Other exclusion criteria were recurrent CRC or cancer associated with familial adenomatous polyposis and inflammatory bowel disease.

Preoperative investigations included colonoscopy, chest X-rays, ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) of the liver, and blood tests for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). A 3-mL peripheral blood sample from each patient was obtained. Serum CEA levels were determined using an enzyme immunoassay test kit (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA, United States) with the upper limit of 5 ng/mL being defined as normal according to the kit manufacturer.

We established a 5- to 10-year follow-up period which included serum CEA measurements every 3 mo for the first 2 years and every 6 mo for the next 3 years, hepatic imaging (ultrasonography or CT) and chest X-rays every 3 mo, pelvic CT for rectal cancer every 6 mo, and colonoscopy every year.

Continuous variables were presented as means (standard deviation) and dichotomous variables were presented as number and percentage values. Patients with and without metastasis were compared with regard to age, gender, and clinicopathologic characteristics using the independent t test or χ2 test, as appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for distant metastasis. Variables significant at P < 0.10 by univariate analysis were subjected to stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors (P < 0.05) for distant metastasis. All analysis were performed with SPSS version 17 statistical software package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).

RESULTS

Demographic data of the 159 patients with pT1 CRC are shown in Table 1. Distant metastasis occurred in 6 (3.8%) of the 159 patients during a median follow-up of 67.0 (46.5%) mo. The rates of distant metastasis in patients with pT1 cancer of the colon and rectum were 6.7% and 2.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The recurrence rates among male and female patients with pT1 CRC were 6.25% and 1.27%, respectively (P < 0.001). The most frequent site of metastasis was the liver in pT1 CRC. Preoperative serum CEA level was higher in patients with distant metastasis than in patients without distant metastasis (11.35 ng/mL vs 3.25 ng/mL). Comparisons of patients with and without distant metastasis are shown in Table 1. The distant metastasis negative and positive groups were similar with regard to patient demographics and clinicopathologic features.

Table 1 Characteristics of 159 patients n (%).
CharacteristicsWith T1 colorectal cancerWithout metastasis(n = 153)With metastasis(n = 6)P value
Age, yr, mean ± SD60.7 ± 11.760.48 ± 11.8366.33 ± 7.0120.231
Gender0.099
Male80 (50.3)755
Female79 (49.7)781
Primary site0.647
Cecum3 (1.9)30
Ascending colon9 (5.7)81
Transverse colon6 (3.8)60
Descending colon6 (3.8)51
Sigmoid colon21 (13.2)201
Rectosigmoid8 (5.0)80
Rectum104 (65.4)1013
Anus canal2 (1.3)20
Pathology0.919
Well differentiated11 (6.9)110
Moderately differentiated83 (52.2)794
Poorly differentiated2 (1.3)20
Mucinous4 (2.5)40
Localized canceration59 (37.1)572
Lymphnode metastasis0.611
N0146 (91.8)1415
N111 (6.9)101
N22 (1.3)20
CEA, ng/mL, mean ± SD3.60 ± 4.013.29 ± 3.5011.35 ± 7.870.054

Based on univariate analysis of the correlation between lymph node metastasis (LNM) and clinicopathologic features, we found that age (P = 0.522), gender (P = 0.980), tumor location (P = 0.330), tumor size (P = 0.786), histological grade (P = 0.509), and high serum CEA level (P = 0.262) were not predictive factors for LNM (Table 2).

Table 2 Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.
ParameterOdds ratio (95%CI)P value
Lymph node metastasis
Age1.015 (0.970, 1.062)0.522
Gender0.986 (0.329, 2.954)0.980
Location0.518 (0.138, 1.943)0.330
Tumor size0.859 (0.287, 2.574)0.786
Histological grade0.929 (0.748, 1.155)0.509
CEA0.445 (0.115, 1.805)0.262
Distant metastasis
Age1.050 (0.969, 1.138)0.231
Gender0.192 (0.022, 1.685)0.137
Location0.485 (0.095, 2.491)0.386
Tumor size0.563 (0.100, 3.163)0.514
Histological grade1.365 (0.957, 1.945)0.086
LNM2.154 (0.234, 19.850)0.498
CEA (preoperation)18.400 (3.106, 109.006)0.001

Univariate analysis revealed that age (P = 0.231), gender (P = 0.137), tumor location (P = 0.386), and tumor size (P = 0.514) were not risk factors for distant metastasis after radical resection for pT1 CRC (Table 2). The patients with unfavorable histological grade [odds ratio (OR) 1.365] were more likely to have metastasis, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.086). Postoperative metastasis was only significantly correlated with a high serum CEA level (P = 0.001, Table 2). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, high serum CEA level (OR 15.341, 95%CI 2.371-99.275, P = 0.004) was an independent predictor for postoperative distant metastasis.

Details of patients with distant metastasis are shown in Table 3. All distant metastases were found less than 3 years after surgery. Two of the six patients died due to the metastases, and the remaining patients are still alive after hepatic resection.

Table 3 Details of distant metastasis patients.
No.Age (yr)GenderLocationCEA (ng/mL)Histological gradeLNMDFSRecurrent sitePrognosis
162MaleAscending colon13.66Moderately differentiated0/38Liver and spleenDiseased
261MaleDescending colon24.00Localized canceration0/1523LiverSurvived
368MaleRectum15.00Moderately differentiated1/110LiverSurvived
463FemaleSigmoid colon7.91Moderately differentiated0/1030Liver and lungDiseased
580MaleRectum5.20Localized canceration0/211LiverSurvived
DISCUSSION

Patients with pT1 CRC have a favorable prognosis, however, some patients develop recurrence including local recurrence and distant metastasis after radical resection[14,15]. Total recurrence rates have been reported to be as low as 0%-4% and as high as 17%-31% in T1 CRC[16]. The rate of distant metastasis in the present study was 3.8% which was consistent with a previous report.

Various factors such as serum CEA level, histological grade, and LNM for distant metastasis in CRC have been identified in previous reports[17-20], but most of these reports included pT2-T4 patients, and there is a paucity of evidence on the risk factors for distant metastasis in pT1 CRC[21-25]. Following univariate analysis of our data, we found that preoperative serum CEA level (OR 18.400, 95%CI 3.106-109.006, P = 0.001) and histological grade (OR 1.365, 95%CI 0.957-1.945, P = 0.086) were risk factors for predicting postoperative distant metastasis in patients with pT1 CRC.

Previous studies have reported that the LNM rate is up to 21% for T1-T2 CRC[21,22]. LNM is considered a risk factor for distant metastasis after radical resection for CRC[22]. It is noteworthy that LNM did not reach statistical significance in our series, with a higher OR in univariate analysis (OR 2.154, 95%CI 0.234-19.850, P = 0.498). Although our results did not show the same conclusion as previous reports, it is difficult to confidently exclude a correlation between LNM and distant metastasis in T1 CRC, because most patients (5/6, 83.3%) had less than 12 lymph nodes investigated (mean 6.2 lymph nodes).

CEA has been proved to be important in the assessment of prognosis of advanced CRC. Koca et al[11] conducted a study on 221 individuals, comprised of 69 (31.2%) patients with clinical stage II and 152 (68.8%) with clinical stage III, to evaluate potential predictors of recurrence and survival. They found that high serum CEA level was one of the risk factors for recurrence. Kim et al[26] also found that elevation of serum CEA was an independent factor for pulmonary metastasis after curative resection in 105 patients with CRC. In multivariate analysis of our data, we found that preoperative serum CEA level was an independent risk factor (OR 15.341, 95%CI 2.371-99.275, P = 0.004) in the prediction of postoperative distant metastasis in patients with pT1 CRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy might be necessary for such patients. Regular surveillance after radical resection in CRC patients should be performed, even if they have pT1 CRC, especially in patients with an increased serum CEA level. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating a predictive role for serum CEA level in distant metastasis after radical resection in patients with pT1 CRC.

Interestingly, in our study, with a median follow-up period of 67.0 mo, the rates of distant metastasis in patients with T1 cancer of the colon and rectum were 6.7% and 2.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The rates of distant metastasis in male and female patients with T1 CRC were 6.25% and 1.27%, respectively (P < 0.001). It is necessary to accumulate evidence in further studies to confirm these differences, because there is a limit to the number of cases seen in a single institution.

On the basis of our study of 159 consecutive patients with pT1 CRC, we propose that the increased preoperative serum CEA level is the independent risk factor for distant metastasis after radical resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy and regular surveillance after radical resection for such patients should be performed.

COMMENTS
Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Previous studies have focused on evaluating the risk factors for lymph node metastasis, and there is little evidence with regard to the risk factors for postoperative distant metastasis in patients with pathologically T1 (pT1) CRC.

Research frontiers

Patients with pT1 CRC have a favorable prognosis, but some patients develop recurrence including local recurrence and distant metastasis after radical resection. In this study, the authors demonstrate that the preoperative carcinoembryonic antibody (CEA) level could be predictive of distant metastasis in pT1 CRC after radical surgery.

Innovations and breakthroughs

The authors described the relationship between preoperative CEA levels and distant metastasis in pT1 CRC after surgery. This is the first study to demonstrate a predictive role for serum CEA level in distant metastasis after radical resection in patients with pT1 CRC.

Applications

Preoperative CEA level could be predictive of distant metastasis in pT1 CRC patients after radical surgery. This study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy might be necessary for such patients.

Terminology

Preoperative serum CEA level is a risk factor in the prediction of postoperative distant metastasis in patients with pT1 CRC.

Peer review

The authors present an interesting study on risk factors for the occurrence of distant metastasis in early pT1 colorectal carcinomas. The manuscript is well structured and the cited literature is comprehensive and up-to-date. This is a clinically very interesting topic. Their results are very valuable.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers Linnebacher M, Tsuchida A S- Editor Huang XZ L- Editor A E- Editor Li JY

References
1.  Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999;49:8-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2345]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2198]  [Article Influence: 87.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Weinberg DS, Schoen RE. Colorectal cancer screening: America’s next top model? Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:673-674.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Patel SS, Floyd A, Doorly MG, Ortega AE, Ault GT, Kaiser AM, Senagore AJ. Current controversies in the management of colon cancer. Curr Probl Surg. 2012;49:398-460.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Zhao P, Dai M, Chen W, Li N. Cancer trends in China. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:281-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 225]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 251]  [Article Influence: 17.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Wang JH, King TM, Chang MC, Hsu CW. Oxaliplatin-induced severe anaphylactic reactions in metastatic colorectal cancer: case series analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5427-5433.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Iida S, Hasegawa H, Okabayashi K, Moritani K, Mukai M, Kitagawa Y. Risk factors for postoperative recurrence in patients with pathologically T1 colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36:424-430.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Ramos-Esquivel A. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1064-1065; author reply 1065-1066.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Okabe S, Shia J, Nash G, Wong WD, Guillem JG, Weiser MR, Temple L, Sugihara K, Paty PB. Lymph node metastasis in T1 adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:1032-1039; discussion 1039-1040.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 129]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Dias AR, Nahas CS, Marques CF, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications, results and controversies. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13:105-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Gao JY, Song BR, Peng JJ, Lu YM. Correlation between mitochondrial TRAP-1 expression and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5965-5971.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Koca D, Binicier C, Oztop I, Yavuzsen T, Ellidokuz H, Yilmaz U. Prognostic factors affecting recurrence and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. J BUON. 2012;17:291-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Suh JH, Han KS, Kim BC, Hong CW, Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, Choi HS. Predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2012;44:590-595.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Chang HC, Huang SC, Chen JS, Tang R, Changchien CR, Chiang JM, Yeh CY, Hsieh PS, Tsai WS, Hung HY. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in pT1 and pT2 rectal cancer: a single-institute experience in 943 patients and literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2477-2484.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 60]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Mroczkowski P, Schmidt U, Sahm M, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Kube R. Prognostic factors assessed for 15,096 patients with colon cancer in stages I and II. World J Surg. 2012;36:1693-1698.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Stipa F, Giaccaglia V, Burza A. Management and outcome of local recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:262-269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Sugihara K, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, Kameoka S, Saito Y, Takahashi K, Hase K. Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study. Surgery. 2007;141:67-75.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 196]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 198]  [Article Influence: 11.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Shin R, Jeong SY, Yoo HY, Park KJ, Heo SC, Kang GH, Kim WH, Park JG. Depth of mesorectal extension has prognostic significance in patients with T3 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1220-1228.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Lee SD, Kim TH, Kim DY, Baek JY, Kim SY, Chang HJ, Park SC, Park JW, Oh JH, Jung KH. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:478-483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Storli KE, Søndenaa K, Bukholm IR, Nesvik I, Bru T, Furnes B, Hjelmeland B, Iversen KB, Eide GE. Overall survival after resection for colon cancer in a national cohort study was adversely affected by TNM stage, lymph node ratio, gender, and old age. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1299-1307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Klaver YL, Lemmens VE, Nienhuijs SW, Luyer MD, de Hingh IH. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: Incidence, prognosis and treatment options. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5489-5494.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 7.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Nano M, Ferronato M, Solej M, D’Amico S. T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery? Tumori. 2006;92:469-473.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Mehrkhani F, Nasiri S, Donboli K, Meysamie A, Hedayat A. Prognostic factors in survival of colorectal cancer patients after surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:157-161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Kato T, Mori T, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Saito Y, Watanabe M, Morita T, Hida J. Is total mesorectal excision always necessary for T1-T2 lower rectal cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:973-980.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Lymphovascular or perineural invasion may predict lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 and T2 colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1074-1080.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 74]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, Kameoka S, Saito Y, Takahashi K, Hase K, Oya M. Characteristics of recurrence after curative resection for T1 colorectal cancer: Japanese multicenter study. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:203-211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Kim CH, Huh JW, Kim HJ, Lim SW, Song SY, Kim HR, Na KJ, Kim YJ. Factors influencing oncological outcomes in patients who develop pulmonary metastases after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:459-464.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]